Bill Commons
Back to policy developments

Policy research briefing

Collection edition: 2026-10-31T03:24:41Z. Status and source-check dates appear per record. Reopening this URL shows the current collection; this link is not an archived snapshot.

Bounded, source-labelled corpus of selected United States state and federal actions, international instruments, and original-author compute-governance research. It is not a complete jurisdictional tracker, legal advice, or a statement that any proposal is binding. Historical policy-event dates are distinct from retrieval health supplied by an operator refresh snapshot.

  1. Executive Order 14365: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence

Executive Order 14365: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence

Executive order directing agency state-law evaluation, litigation/funding actions, and a legislative recommendation; its listed preemption recommendation excludes AI compute and data-center infrastructure except generally applicable permitting reforms.

Automated source check: observed.

Issuer
Executive Office of the President
Jurisdiction / parties
United States federal
Instrument
executive order
Status
issued · as of 2025-12-11
Published
2025-12-11
Last source check
2026-10-31T07:30:18.124533+00:00

What the instrument says

No inference about later revocation, amendment, or implementation.

  • Attorney General

    Establish an AI Litigation Task Force.

    Date / deadline: 2026-01-10

    EO 14365 §3

  • Secretary of Commerce

    Publish the specified evaluation of State AI laws.

    Date / deadline: 2026-03-11

    EO 14365 §4

  • Officials named in §8

    Prepare a legislative recommendation that does not propose preemption of otherwise lawful State laws concerning AI compute/data-center infrastructure except generally applicable permitting reforms.

    EO 14365 §8

What would need to be proven?

The following mappings are analysis. Candidate evidence is not proof that a vendor satisfies an obligation, and hardware attestation alone does not establish legal compliance.

Claim to examine
A directed federal deliverable was issued.
Candidate evidence
Dated notices, memoranda, proceedings, and recommendations.
Possible approach
Trace the artifact to the cited order section.
Assumptions
  • The order remained applicable on the claimed observation date.
Limits and open questions
  • Issuance does not enact a federal AI statute or establish later status.

Original sources

  • EO 14365

    §§3-8

    Published: 2025-12-11 · Retrieved: 2026-10-31T07:30:18.124533+00:00

    Manual source audit: 2026-10-31T03:24:41Z

    Retrieval method: automated fetch

    • Sections 3 and 4 set the cited 30-day and 90-day federal deliverables.
    • Section 8's listed recommendation excludes otherwise lawful State laws concerning AI compute and data-center infrastructure, subject to generally applicable permitting reforms.

    Audit limit: The dated issuance text does not establish later revocation, amendment, or implementation.

Observation history

This is Bill Commons’ retained observation history, not a complete history of the instrument. A changed source body requires review before its policy meaning is updated.

  1. 2026-10-31T03:24:41Z · registry record created

    Curated registry entry created; this is not a source retrieval.

  2. 2026-10-31T07:30:18.124533+00:00 · source check

    Source fetch outcome; body changes require human review and do not assert a policy change.