WY HB 91
deadBan on government social scoring with AI.
Wyoming · 2026 · lower
Quick answers
Did WY HB 91 pass?
No. WY HB 91 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-23). Latest recorded action (2026-02-23): H COW:H Did not consider for COW
What is WY HB 91 about?
AN ACT relating to administration of the government; prohibiting government entities from using artificial intelligence to calculate and assign social scores; prohibiting government entities from using artificial intelligence to identify persons using biometric data or gathering of images; providing exceptions; providing definitions; and providing for an effective date.
Who sponsors WY HB 91?
Yin is the primary sponsor of WY HB 91, joined by 2 cosponsors.
Description
AN ACT relating to administration of the government; prohibiting government entities from using artificial intelligence to calculate and assign social scores; prohibiting government entities from using artificial intelligence to identify persons using biometric data or gathering of images; providing exceptions; providing definitions; and providing for an effective date.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-11
- Latest action
- 2026-02-23 — H COW:H Did not consider for COW
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Yinprimary
- Rothfusscosponsor
- Provenzacosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-02-23
H COW:H Did not consider for COW
committee-failure
2026-02-19
H Placed on General File
2026-02-19
H01 - Judiciary:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 7-1-1-0-0
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-11
H Introduced and Referred to H01 - Judiciary 44-17-1-0-0
introduction,referral-committee
2026-02-05
H Received for Introduction
filing
2026-02-04
Bill Number Assigned
reading-1
Versions
Documents
Votes
H Introduced and Referred to H01 - Judiciary 44-17-1-0-0
2026-02-11 · pass · 44-17
Member-level votes (65)
- Andrew: yes
- Banks: yes
- Bear: yes
- Brown: yes
- L: yes
- Byron: yes
- Campbell: yes
- E: yes
- Chestek: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Davis: yes
- Erickson: yes
- Filer: yes
- Fornstrom: yes
- Geringer: yes
- Haroldson: yes
- Harshman: yes
- Heiner: yes
- Jarvis: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Knapp: yes
- Larsen: yes
- Lawley: yes
- Larson: yes
- JT: yes
- Lucas: yes
- Locke: yes
- McCann: yes
- Nicholas: yes
- Pendergraft: yes
- Provenza: yes
- Posey: yes
- Riggins: yes
- Singh: yes
- Schmid: yes
- Sherwood: yes
- Storer: yes
- Styvar: yes
- Tarver: yes
- Washut: yes
- Thayer: yes
- Webb: yes
- Wharff: yes
- Williams: yes
- Wylie: yes
- Neiman: yes
- Yin: yes
- Allemand: no
- Angelos: no
- Brady: no
- Bratten: no
- G: no
- K: no
- Clouston: no
- Guggenmos: no
- Hoeft: no
- Lien: no
- Ottman: no
- Rodriguez-Williams: no
- Smith: no
- Strock: no
- Wasserburger: no
- Webber: no
- Winter: no
- Kelly: excused
H01 - Judiciary:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 7-1-1-0-0
2026-02-19 · pass · 7-1
Member-level votes (9)
- BRADY: yes
- BRATTEN: yes
- CHESTEK: yes
- FILER: yes
- LIEN: yes
- SINGH: yes
- WASHUT: yes
- WEBB: no
- KELLY: excused
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:38:54.484336Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=WY&identifier=HB 91. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.