WY HB 66
deadJudicial deference-agencies.
Wyoming · 2026 · lower
Quick answers
Did WY HB 66 pass?
No. WY HB 66 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-23). Latest recorded action (2026-02-23): H COW:H Did not consider for COW
What is WY HB 66 about?
AN ACT relating to administrative procedure; amending the judicial review process of agency actions; amending standards of review of administrative actions; specifying applicability; and providing for an effective date.
Who sponsors WY HB 66?
Singh is the primary sponsor of WY HB 66, joined by 3 cosponsors.
Description
AN ACT relating to administrative procedure; amending the judicial review process of agency actions; amending standards of review of administrative actions; specifying applicability; and providing for an effective date.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-11
- Latest action
- 2026-02-23 — H COW:H Did not consider for COW
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Singhprimary
- Laursen, Dcosponsor
- Bankscosponsor
- Andrewcosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-02-23
H COW:H Did not consider for COW
committee-failure
2026-02-14
H Placed on General File
2026-02-14
H01 - Judiciary:Recommend Do Pass 7-1-1-0-0
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-11
H Introduced and Referred to H01 - Judiciary 51-10-1-0-0
introduction,referral-committee
2026-02-05
H Received for Introduction
filing
2026-01-29
Bill Number Assigned
reading-1
Versions
Documents
Votes
H Introduced and Referred to H01 - Judiciary 51-10-1-0-0
2026-02-11 · pass · 51-10
Member-level votes (65)
- Allemand: yes
- Andrew: yes
- Angelos: yes
- Banks: yes
- Bear: yes
- Bratten: yes
- Brady: yes
- Brown: yes
- G: yes
- L: yes
- Campbell: yes
- K: yes
- Clouston: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Filer: yes
- Fornstrom: yes
- Geringer: yes
- Haroldson: yes
- Guggenmos: yes
- Hoeft: yes
- Heiner: yes
- Jarvis: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Knapp: yes
- Lawley: yes
- Larsen: yes
- Larson: yes
- JT: yes
- Lien: yes
- Locke: yes
- McCann: yes
- Lucas: yes
- Pendergraft: yes
- Ottman: yes
- Posey: yes
- Riggins: yes
- Rodriguez-Williams: yes
- Schmid: yes
- Singh: yes
- Smith: yes
- Strock: yes
- Styvar: yes
- Tarver: yes
- Thayer: yes
- Washut: yes
- Wasserburger: yes
- Webb: yes
- Webber: yes
- Wharff: yes
- Williams: yes
- Wylie: yes
- Winter: yes
- Yin: yes
- Neiman: yes
- Byron: no
- E: no
- Chestek: no
- Davis: no
- Erickson: no
- Harshman: no
- Nicholas: no
- Provenza: no
- Sherwood: no
- Storer: no
- Kelly: excused
H01 - Judiciary:Recommend Do Pass 7-1-1-0-0
2026-02-14 · pass · 7-1
Member-level votes (9)
- BRADY: yes
- BRATTEN: yes
- FILER: yes
- LIEN: yes
- SINGH: yes
- WEBB: yes
- WASHUT: yes
- CHESTEK: no
- KELLY: excused
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:38:54.484336Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=WY&identifier=HB 66. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.