WY HB 160
deadDigital Taxonomy Act.
Wyoming · 2026 · lower
Quick answers
Did WY HB 160 pass?
No. WY HB 160 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-03-03). Latest recorded action (2026-03-03): H:Died in Committee Returned Bill Pursuant to HR 5-4
What is WY HB 160 about?
AN ACT relating to distributed ledger digital assets and sealed tokens; establishing the classification of digital assets as specified; creating a sealed scope hierarchy and multi-aspect analytical framework for digital assets; establishing jurisdictional nexus and lex situs requirements for keyholders and digital assets; providing for the characterization of digital assets; providing definitions; providing legislative findings; specifying applicability; and providing for an effective date.
Who sponsors WY HB 160?
Singh is the primary sponsor of WY HB 160.
Description
AN ACT relating to distributed ledger digital assets and sealed tokens; establishing the classification of digital assets as specified; creating a sealed scope hierarchy and multi-aspect analytical framework for digital assets; establishing jurisdictional nexus and lex situs requirements for keyholders and digital assets; providing for the characterization of digital assets; providing definitions; providing legislative findings; specifying applicability; and providing for an effective date.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-14
- Latest action
- 2026-03-03 — H:Died in Committee Returned Bill Pursuant to HR 5-4
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Singhprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-03-03
H:Died in Committee Returned Bill Pursuant to HR 5-4
committee-failure
2026-02-21
H No report prior to CoW Cutoff
2026-02-14
H Introduced and Referred to H09 - Minerals 50-11-1-0-0
introduction,referral-committee
2026-02-11
H Received for Introduction
filing
2026-02-11
Bill Number Assigned
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf
Votes
H Introduced and Referred to H09 - Minerals 50-11-1-0-0
2026-02-14 · pass · 50-11
Member-level votes (65)
- Allemand: yes
- Andrew: yes
- Angelos: yes
- Banks: yes
- Bear: yes
- Brady: yes
- Bratten: yes
- Brown: yes
- G: yes
- L: yes
- Campbell: yes
- E: yes
- K: yes
- Clouston: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Erickson: yes
- Filer: yes
- Fornstrom: yes
- Geringer: yes
- Guggenmos: yes
- Haroldson: yes
- Hoeft: yes
- Heiner: yes
- Jarvis: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Knapp: yes
- Larsen: yes
- Larson: yes
- JT: yes
- Lawley: yes
- Lien: yes
- Locke: yes
- McCann: yes
- Ottman: yes
- Pendergraft: yes
- Posey: yes
- Riggins: yes
- Schmid: yes
- Rodriguez-Williams: yes
- Singh: yes
- Smith: yes
- Styvar: yes
- Washut: yes
- Strock: yes
- Tarver: yes
- Wasserburger: yes
- Webb: yes
- Webber: yes
- Wharff: yes
- Williams: yes
- Winter: yes
- Yin: yes
- Neiman: yes
- Byron: no
- Chestek: no
- Davis: no
- Harshman: no
- Lucas: no
- Nicholas: no
- Provenza: no
- Sherwood: no
- Storer: no
- Thayer: no
- Wylie: no
- Kelly: excused
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:38:54.484336Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=WY&identifier=HB 160. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.