Bill Commons

WI SB 289

dead

Relating to: requirements for proposed administrative rules that impose any costs.

Wisconsin · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Quick answers

Did WI SB 289 pass?

No. WI SB 289 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-05-13). Latest recorded action (2026-05-13): Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

What is WI SB 289 about?

WI SB 289 is a bill in the 2025-2026 Regular Session titled “Relating to: requirements for proposed administrative rules that impose any costs.”.

Who sponsors WI SB 289?

Tomczyk, Stafsholt, Quinn and 6 others are the primary sponsors of WI SB 289.

Introduced
2025-05-30
Latest action
2026-05-13 — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Sponsors

  • Tomczykprimary
  • Stafsholtprimary
  • Quinnprimary
  • Nassprimary
  • Kapengaprimary
  • Huttonprimary
  • Feyenprimary
  • Cabral-Guevaraprimary
  • Bradleyprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-05-30

    Introduced by Senators Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Feyen, Hutton, Kapenga, Nass, Quinn, Stafsholt and Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives Gustafson, Nedweski, Armstrong, Behnke, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Dittrich, Donovan, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, B. Jacobson, Kaufert, Knodl, Kreibich, Krug, Maxey, Melotik, Murphy, Mursau, Neylon, O'Connor, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Tittl, Tranel, Tusler, Wichgers and Wittke

    introduction

  2. 2025-05-30

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs

    reading-1,referral-committee

  3. 2025-10-09

    Public hearing held

  4. 2025-11-07

    Executive action taken

  5. 2025-11-07

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2

    committee-passage-favorable

  6. 2025-11-07

    Available for scheduling

  7. 2026-02-09

    Placed on calendar 2-11-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  8. 2026-02-11

    Read a second time

    reading-2

  9. 2026-02-11

    Ordered to a third reading

    reading-3

  10. 2026-02-11

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  11. 2026-02-11

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 18, Noes 15

    passage,reading-3

  12. 2026-02-11

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. 2026-02-12

    Received from Senate

    receipt

  14. 2026-02-12

    Read

  15. 2026-02-12

    Rules suspended to withdraw from Senate message and take up

  16. 2026-02-12

    Read a second time

    reading-2

  17. 2026-02-12

    Ordered to a third reading

    reading-3

  18. 2026-02-12

    Rules suspended

  19. 2026-02-12

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 53, Noes 45

    passage,reading-3

  20. 2026-02-12

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. 2026-02-13

    Received from Assembly concurred in

    receipt

  22. 2026-02-20

    LRB correction

  23. 2026-02-20

    Report correctly enrolled

    enrolled

  24. 2026-03-18

    Presented to the Governor on 3-18-2026

    executive-receipt

  25. 2026-03-20

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-20-2026

    executive-veto

  26. 2026-05-12

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  27. 2026-05-13

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

    failure

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Report passage recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2

    2025-11-07 · pass · 3-2

  • PASSAGE

    2026-02-11 · pass · 18-15

    Member-level votes (33)
    • BRADLEY: yes
    • JAGLER: yes
    • QUINN: yes
    • CABRAL-GUEVARA: yes
    • JAMES: yes
    • STAFSHOLT: yes
    • FELZKOWSKI: yes
    • KAPENGA: yes
    • TESTIN: yes
    • FEYEN: yes
    • LEMAHIEU: yes
    • TOMCZYK: yes
    • HUTTON: yes
    • MARKLEIN: yes
    • WANGGAARD: yes
    • JACQUE: yes
    • NASS: yes
    • WIMBERGER: yes
    • CARPENTER: no
    • JOHNSON: no
    • ROYS: no
    • DASSLER-ALFHEI: no
    • KEYESKI: no
    • SMITH: no
    • DRAKE: no
    • LARSON: no
    • SPREITZER: no
    • HABUSH SINYKIN: no
    • PFAFF: no
    • WALL: no
    • HESSELBEIN: no
    • RATCLIFF: no
    • WIRCH: no
  • CONCURRENCE

    2026-02-12 · pass · 53-45

    Member-level votes (98)
    • ALLEN: yes
    • ANDERSON: no
    • ANDRACA: no
    • ARMSTRONG: yes
    • ARNEY: no
    • AUGUST: yes
    • BARE: no
    • BEHNKE: yes
    • BILLINGS: no
    • BORN: yes
    • BRILL: yes
    • BROOKS: yes
    • BROWN: no
    • CALLAHAN: yes
    • CLANCY: no
    • CRUZ: no
    • DALLMAN: yes
    • DESANTO: no
    • DESMIDT: no
    • DITTRICH: yes
    • DONOVAN: yes
    • DOYLE: no
    • DUCHOW: yes
    • EMERSON: no
    • FITZGERALD: no
    • FRANKLIN: yes
    • GOEBEN: yes
    • GOODWIN: no
    • GREEN: yes
    • GUNDRUM: yes
    • GUSTAFSON: yes
    • HAYWOOD: no
    • HONG: no
    • HURD: yes
    • HYSELL: no
    • JACOBSON, B: yes
    • JACOBSON, J: no
    • JOERS: no
    • JOHNSON: no
    • KAUFERT: yes
    • KIRSCH: no
    • KITCHENS: yes
    • KNODL: yes
    • KREIBICH: yes
    • KRUG: yes
    • KURTZ: yes
    • MADISON: no
    • MAXEY: yes
    • MAYADEV: no
    • MCCARVILLE: no
    • MCGUIRE: no
    • MELOTIK: yes
    • MIRESSE: no
    • MOORE OMOKUNDE: no
    • MOSES: yes
    • MURPHY: yes
    • MURSAU: yes
    • NEDWESKI: yes
    • NEUBAUER: no
    • NEYLON: yes
    • NOVAK: yes
    • O'CONNOR: yes
    • ORTIZ-VELEZ: no
    • PALMERI: no
    • PENTERMAN: yes
    • PETERSEN: yes
    • PHELPS: no
    • PIWOWARCZYK: yes
    • PRADO: no
    • PRONSCHINSKE: yes
    • RIVERA-WAGNER: no
    • RODRIGUEZ: yes
    • ROE: no
    • SHEEHAN: no
    • SINICKI: no
    • SNODGRASS: no
    • SNYDER: yes
    • SORTWELL: yes
    • SPAUDE: no
    • SPIROS: yes
    • STEFFEN: yes
    • STROUD: no
    • STUBBS: no
    • SUBECK: no
    • SUMMERFIELD: yes
    • SWEARINGEN: yes
    • TAYLOR: no
    • TENORIO: no
    • TITTL: yes
    • TRANEL: yes
    • TUCKER: yes
    • TUSLER: yes
    • UDELL: no
    • VANDERMEER: yes
    • VINING: no
    • WICHGERS: yes
    • WITTKE: yes
    • SPEAKER: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:37:42.962855Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=WI&identifier=SB 289. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.