Bill Commons

WI SB 289

dead

Relating to: requirements for proposed administrative rules that impose any costs.

Wisconsin · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did WI SB 289 pass?

No. WI SB 289 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-05-13): Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

What is WI SB 289 about?

WI SB 289 is a bill in the 2025-2026 Regular Session titled “Relating to: requirements for proposed administrative rules that impose any costs.”.

Who sponsors WI SB 289?

Tomczyk, Stafsholt, Quinn and 6 others are the primary sponsors of WI SB 289.

Introduced
2025-05-30
Latest action
2026-05-13 — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Sponsors

  • Tomczykprimary
  • Stafsholtprimary
  • Quinnprimary
  • Nassprimary
  • Kapengaprimary
  • Huttonprimary
  • Feyenprimary
  • Cabral-Guevaraprimary
  • Bradleyprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-05-13

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

    failure

  2. 2026-05-12

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  3. 2026-03-20

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-20-2026

    executive-veto

  4. 2026-03-18

    Presented to the Governor on 3-18-2026

    executive-receipt

  5. 2026-02-20

    Report correctly enrolled

    enrolled

  6. 2026-02-20

    LRB correction

  7. 2026-02-13

    Received from Assembly concurred in

    receipt

  8. 2026-02-12

    Ordered immediately messaged

  9. 2026-02-12

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 53, Noes 45

    passage,reading-3

  10. 2026-02-12

    Rules suspended

  11. 2026-02-12

    Ordered to a third reading

    reading-3

  12. 2026-02-12

    Read a second time

    reading-2

  13. 2026-02-12

    Rules suspended to withdraw from Senate message and take up

  14. 2026-02-12

    Read

  15. 2026-02-12

    Received from Senate

    receipt

  16. 2026-02-11

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. 2026-02-11

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 18, Noes 15

    passage,reading-3

  18. 2026-02-11

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  19. 2026-02-11

    Ordered to a third reading

    reading-3

  20. 2026-02-11

    Read a second time

    reading-2

  21. 2026-02-09

    Placed on calendar 2-11-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  22. 2025-11-07

    Available for scheduling

  23. 2025-11-07

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2

    committee-passage-favorable

  24. 2025-11-07

    Executive action taken

  25. 2025-10-09

    Public hearing held

  26. 2025-05-30

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs

    reading-1,referral-committee

  27. 2025-05-30

    Introduced by Senators Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Feyen, Hutton, Kapenga, Nass, Quinn, Stafsholt and Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives Gustafson, Nedweski, Armstrong, Behnke, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Dittrich, Donovan, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, B. Jacobson, Kaufert, Knodl, Kreibich, Krug, Maxey, Melotik, Murphy, Mursau, Neylon, O'Connor, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Tittl, Tranel, Tusler, Wichgers and Wittke

    introduction

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Report passage recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2

    2025-11-07 · pass · 3-2

  • PASSAGE

    2026-02-11 · pass · 18-15

    Member-level votes (33)
    • BRADLEY: yes
    • JAGLER: yes
    • QUINN: yes
    • CABRAL-GUEVARA: yes
    • JAMES: yes
    • STAFSHOLT: yes
    • FELZKOWSKI: yes
    • KAPENGA: yes
    • TESTIN: yes
    • FEYEN: yes
    • LEMAHIEU: yes
    • TOMCZYK: yes
    • HUTTON: yes
    • MARKLEIN: yes
    • WANGGAARD: yes
    • JACQUE: yes
    • NASS: yes
    • WIMBERGER: yes
    • CARPENTER: no
    • JOHNSON: no
    • ROYS: no
    • DASSLER-ALFHEI: no
    • KEYESKI: no
    • SMITH: no
    • DRAKE: no
    • LARSON: no
    • SPREITZER: no
    • HABUSH SINYKIN: no
    • PFAFF: no
    • WALL: no
    • HESSELBEIN: no
    • RATCLIFF: no
    • WIRCH: no
  • CONCURRENCE

    2026-02-12 · pass · 53-45

    Member-level votes (98)
    • ALLEN: yes
    • ANDERSON: no
    • ANDRACA: no
    • ARMSTRONG: yes
    • ARNEY: no
    • AUGUST: yes
    • BARE: no
    • BEHNKE: yes
    • BILLINGS: no
    • BORN: yes
    • BRILL: yes
    • BROOKS: yes
    • BROWN: no
    • CALLAHAN: yes
    • CLANCY: no
    • CRUZ: no
    • DALLMAN: yes
    • DESANTO: no
    • DESMIDT: no
    • DITTRICH: yes
    • DONOVAN: yes
    • DOYLE: no
    • DUCHOW: yes
    • EMERSON: no
    • FITZGERALD: no
    • FRANKLIN: yes
    • GOEBEN: yes
    • GOODWIN: no
    • GREEN: yes
    • GUNDRUM: yes
    • GUSTAFSON: yes
    • HAYWOOD: no
    • HONG: no
    • HURD: yes
    • HYSELL: no
    • JACOBSON, B: yes
    • JACOBSON, J: no
    • JOERS: no
    • JOHNSON: no
    • KAUFERT: yes
    • KIRSCH: no
    • KITCHENS: yes
    • KNODL: yes
    • KREIBICH: yes
    • KRUG: yes
    • KURTZ: yes
    • MADISON: no
    • MAXEY: yes
    • MAYADEV: no
    • MCCARVILLE: no
    • MCGUIRE: no
    • MELOTIK: yes
    • MIRESSE: no
    • MOORE OMOKUNDE: no
    • MOSES: yes
    • MURPHY: yes
    • MURSAU: yes
    • NEDWESKI: yes
    • NEUBAUER: no
    • NEYLON: yes
    • NOVAK: yes
    • O'CONNOR: yes
    • ORTIZ-VELEZ: no
    • PALMERI: no
    • PENTERMAN: yes
    • PETERSEN: yes
    • PHELPS: no
    • PIWOWARCZYK: yes
    • PRADO: no
    • PRONSCHINSKE: yes
    • RIVERA-WAGNER: no
    • RODRIGUEZ: yes
    • ROE: no
    • SHEEHAN: no
    • SINICKI: no
    • SNODGRASS: no
    • SNYDER: yes
    • SORTWELL: yes
    • SPAUDE: no
    • SPIROS: yes
    • STEFFEN: yes
    • STROUD: no
    • STUBBS: no
    • SUBECK: no
    • SUMMERFIELD: yes
    • SWEARINGEN: yes
    • TAYLOR: no
    • TENORIO: no
    • TITTL: yes
    • TRANEL: yes
    • TUCKER: yes
    • TUSLER: yes
    • UDELL: no
    • VANDERMEER: yes
    • VINING: no
    • WICHGERS: yes
    • WITTKE: yes
    • SPEAKER: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:37:42.962855Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=WI&identifier=SB 289. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.