VT S 69
enactedAn act relating to an age-appropriate design code
Vermont · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Quick answers
Did VT S 69 pass?
Yes. VT S 69 has been enacted into law as of 2025-06-13. Latest recorded action (2025-06-13): Senate Message: Signed by Governor June 12, 2025
What is VT S 69 about?
VT S 69 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “An act relating to an age-appropriate design code”.
Who sponsors VT S 69?
Rebecca White, Richard Westman, David Weeks and 12 others are the primary sponsors of VT S 69.
- Introduced
- 2025-02-13
- Latest action
- 2025-06-13 — Senate Message: Signed by Governor June 12, 2025
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Rebecca Whiteprimary
- Richard Westmanprimary
- David Weeksprimary
- Anne Watsonprimary
- Robert Plunkettprimary
- Andrew Perchlikprimary
- Joseph Majorprimary
- Virginia Lyonsprimary
- Nader Hashimprimary
- Ann Cummingsprimary
- Brian Collamoreprimary
- Alison Clarksonprimary
- Patrick Brennanprimary
- Seth Bongartzprimary
- Wendy Harrisonprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-02-13
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Institutions
introduction
2025-02-28
Entered on Notice Calendar
2025-02-28
Second Reading
reading-2
2025-02-28
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Institutions
committee-passage
2025-03-11
Second Reading
reading-2
2025-03-11
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Institutions
committee-passage
2025-03-12
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
reading-2
2025-03-12
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Institutions
committee-passage
2025-03-12
Read 2nd time, reported favorably with recommendation of amendment by Senator Harrison for Committee on Institutions
committee-passage-favorable,reading-2
2025-03-12
Roll Call, Requested by Sen. Ram Hinsdale
2025-03-12
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Institutions agreed to on roll call, requested by Senator Ram Hinsdale, Passed -- Needed 15 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 25, Nays = 5
2025-03-12
Senator Beck explained vote
2025-03-12
Senator Douglass explained vote
2025-03-12
Senator Hart explained vote
2025-03-12
3rd reading ordered
2025-03-13
New Business/Third Reading
reading-3
2025-03-13
Read 3rd time & passed
reading-3
2025-03-18
Read first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce and Economic Development
introduction
2025-05-22
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
2025-05-23
Action Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
2025-05-23
Read second time
reading-2
2025-05-23
Rep. Micklus of Milton reported for the Committee on Commerce and Economic Development
2025-05-23
Rep. Harvey of Castleton demanded yeas and nays
2025-05-23
Report of Committee on Commerce and Economic Development agreed to
2025-05-23
Which was agreed to on a Roll Call Passed -- Needed 71 of 142 to Pass -- Yeas = 133, Nays = 9
2025-05-23
Third Reading ordered
reading-3
2025-05-27
Action Calendar: Third Reading
reading-3
2025-05-27
Read third time and passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment
amendment-introduction,reading-3
2025-05-27
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
2025-05-27
House message: House passed bill in concurrence with proposal(s) of amendment
2025-05-28
Entered on Notice Calendar
2025-05-28
House proposal of amendment
amendment-introduction
2025-05-29
New Business/House Proposal of Amendment
amendment-introduction
2025-05-29
House proposal of amendment; text
amendment-introduction
2025-05-29
House proposal of amendment concurred in with further proposal of amendment as moved by Senator(s) Harrison and Plunkett
amendment-introduction
2025-05-29
Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Baruth
passage
2025-05-29
Senate Message: House proposal of amendment concurred in with further proposal of amendment thereto
amendment-introduction
2025-05-29
Rules suspended and taken up for immediate consideration, pending entry on Notice Calendar, as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
2025-05-29
Senate proposal of amendment to House proposal of amendment concurred in
amendment-introduction
2025-05-29
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
2025-05-29
House message: House concurred in Senate proposal of amendment to House proposal of amendment
amendment-introduction
2025-05-29
As passed by Senate and House
passage
2025-06-06
Delivered to Governor on June 6, 2025
executive-receipt
2025-06-13
Signed by Governor on June 12, 2025
executive-signature
2025-06-13
Senate Message: Signed by Governor June 12, 2025
executive-signature
Versions
- Act SummaryOpens in a new windowCompare
- As EnactedOpens in a new windowCompare
- As Passed by Both House and Senate (UnofficialOpens in a new window)Compare
- As Passed by Both House and Senate (OfficialOpens in a new window)Compare
- House Proposal of Amendment (UnofficialOpens in a new window)Compare
- House Proposal of Amendment (OfficialOpens in a new window)Compare
- As Passed By the Senate (UnofficialOpens in a new window)Compare
- As Passed By the Senate (OfficialOpens in a new window)Compare
- As IntroducedOpens in a new windowCompare
- (document, no version)Compare
Documents
Votes
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Institutions agreed to on roll call, requested by Senator Ram Hinsdale, Passed -- Needed 15 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 25, Nays = 5
2025-03-12 · pass · 25-5
Member-level votes (30)
- Baruth: yes
- Bongartz: yes
- Brennan: yes
- Brock: yes
- Chittenden: yes
- Clarkson: yes
- Collamore: yes
- Cummings: yes
- Gulick: yes
- Hardy: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Hashim: yes
- Heffernan: yes
- Lyons: yes
- Major: yes
- Mattos: yes
- Perchlik: yes
- Plunkett: yes
- Ram Hinsdale: yes
- Vyhovsky: yes
- Watson: yes
- Weeks: yes
- Westman: yes
- White: yes
- Williams: yes
- Beck: no
- Douglass: no
- Hart: no
- Ingalls: no
- Norris: no
Which was agreed to on a Roll Call Passed -- Needed 71 of 142 to Pass -- Yeas = 133, Nays = 9
2025-05-23 · pass · 133-9
Member-level votes (147)
- Arsenault: yes
- Austin: yes
- Bailey: yes
- Bartholomew: yes
- Bartley: yes
- Berbeco: yes
- Birong: yes
- Bishop: yes
- Black: yes
- Bluemle: yes
- Bos-Lun: yes
- Bosch: yes
- Boutin: yes
- Boyden: yes
- Brady: yes
- Branagan: yes
- Brown: yes
- Burditt: yes
- Burke: yes
- Burkhardt: yes
- Burrows: yes
- Burtt: yes
- Carris Duncan: yes
- Casey: yes
- Chapin: yes
- Charlton: yes
- Christie: yes
- Cina: yes
- Coffin: yes
- Cole: yes
- Conlon: yes
- Cooper: yes
- Corcoran: yes
- Cordes: yes
- Critchlow: yes
- Demar: yes
- Dickinson: yes
- Dodge: yes
- Dolan: yes
- Dolgin: yes
- Duke: yes
- Durfee: yes
- Eastes: yes
- Emmons: yes
- Feltus: yes
- Galfetti: yes
- Garofano: yes
- Goldman: yes
- Goodnow: yes
- Goslant: yes
- Graning: yes
- Greer: yes
- Gregoire: yes
- Hango: yes
- Harple: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Headrick: yes
- Higley: yes
- Holcombe: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Houghton: yes
- Howard: yes
- Howland: yes
- James: yes
- Kascenska: yes
- Keyser: yes
- Kimbell: yes
- Kleppner: yes
- Kornheiser: yes
- Krasnow: yes
- Labor: yes
- Lalley: yes
- LaLonde: yes
- LaMont: yes
- Laroche: yes
- Lipsky: yes
- Logan: yes
- Long: yes
- Luneau: yes
- Maguire: yes
- Malay: yes
- Marcotte: yes
- Masland: yes
- McCann: yes
- McFaun: yes
- McGill: yes
- Micklus: yes
- Mihaly: yes
- Minier: yes
- Morgan, L.: yes
- Morgan, M.: yes
- Morris: yes
- Morrissey: yes
- Morrow: yes
- Mrowicki: yes
- Nelson: yes
- North: yes
- Noyes: yes
- Nugent: yes
- O'Brien: yes
- Ode: yes
- Olson: yes
- Page: yes
- Pezzo: yes
- Pouech: yes
- Powers: yes
- Priestley: yes
- Pritchard: yes
- Quimby: yes
- Rachelson: yes
- Satcowitz: yes
- Scheu: yes
- Sheldon: yes
- Sibilia: yes
- Southworth: yes
- Squirrell: yes
- Steady: yes
- Stevens: yes
- Stone: yes
- Surprenant: yes
- Sweeney: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Tomlinson: yes
- Toof: yes
- Torre: yes
- Waszazak: yes
- Waters Evans: yes
- Wells: yes
- White: yes
- Wood: yes
- Yacovone: yes
- Canfield: no
- Harvey: no
- McCoy: no
- Nielsen: no
- Oliver: no
- Parsons: no
- Pinsonault: no
- Tagliavia: no
- Walker: no
- Campbell: not voting
- Dobrovich: not voting
- Donahue: not voting
- Hunter: not voting
- Krowinski: not voting
- Nigro: not voting
- Winter: not voting
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:36:51.365595Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=VT&identifier=S 69. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.