VT H 772

died on adjournment

An act relating to residential rental agreements, eviction procedures, and the creation of the positive rental payment credit reporting pilot program

Vermont · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did VT H 772 pass?

No. VT H 772 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-05-27): 3rd reading refused on roll call, requested by Senator Ram Hinsdale, Failed -- Needed 16 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 15, Nays = 16

What is VT H 772 about?

VT H 772 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “An act relating to residential rental agreements, eviction procedures, and the creation of the positive rental payment credit reporting pilot program”.

Who sponsors VT H 772?

Marc Mihaly is the primary sponsor of VT H 772.

Introduced: 2026-01-23
Latest action: 2026-05-27 — 3rd reading refused on roll call, requested by Senator Ram Hinsdale, Failed -- Needed 16 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 15, Nays = 16
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2026-01-23
Read first time and referred to the Committee on General and Housing
introduction
2026-02-27
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
2026-02-27
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Rule 35(a)
2026-03-24
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
2026-03-25
Action Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
2026-03-25
Read second time
reading-2
2026-03-25
Rep. Krasnow of South Burlington reported for the Committee on General and Housing
2026-03-25
Rep. Bluemle of Burlington recommended for the Committee on Appropriations
2026-03-25
Report of Committee on General and Housing amended as recommended by Committee on Appropriations
2026-03-25
Rep. LaLonde of South Burlington and Burditt of West Rutland moved to amend the bill, which was agreed to
2026-03-25
Rep. Goodnow of Brattleboro, Kornheiser of Brattleboro, and Krasnow of South Burlington moved to amend the bill, which was agreed to
2026-03-25
Rep. Cina of Burlington demanded yeas and nays
2026-03-25
Report of Committee on General and Housing, as amended, agreed to
2026-03-25
Which was agreed to on a Roll Call Passed -- Needed 71 of 141 to Pass -- Yeas = 120, Nays = 21
2026-03-25
Third Reading ordered
reading-3
2026-03-26
Action Calendar: Third Reading
reading-3
2026-03-26
Rep. Mihaly of Calais moved to postpone action until March 27, 2026, which was agreed to
2026-03-27
Action Calendar: Action postponed until March 27, 2026
2026-03-27
Rep. Stevens of Waterbury, Burrows of West Windsor, and LaMont of Morristown moved to amend the bill, which was disagreed to
2026-03-27
Rep. Logan of Burlington moved to amend the bill
2026-03-27
Rep. Tomlinson of Winooski asked that the question be divided
2026-03-27
First division of amendment disagreed to
2026-03-27
Rep. Headrick of Burlington demanded yeas and nays
2026-03-27
Second division of amendment disagreed to
2026-03-27
Which was disagreed to on a Roll Call Failed -- Needed 61 of 122 to Pass -- Yeas = 33, Nays = 89
2026-03-27
Third division of amendment disagreed to
2026-03-27
Read third time and passed
reading-3
2026-04-01
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Judiciary
introduction
2026-05-07
Rules suspended & bill committed to Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs with the report of Committee on Judiciary intact, on motion of Senator Hashim
2026-05-21
Entered on Notice Calendar
2026-05-21
Second Reading
reading-2
2026-05-21
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
amendment-introduction
2026-05-21
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
amendment-introduction
2026-05-21
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Senate Rule 31
2026-05-26
Entered on Notice Calendar
2026-05-26
Second Reading
reading-2
2026-05-26
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
amendment-introduction
2026-05-26
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
amendment-introduction
2026-05-26
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
committee-passage
2026-05-27
New Business/Second Reading
reading-2
2026-05-27
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
amendment-introduction
2026-05-27
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
amendment-introduction
2026-05-27
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
committee-passage
2026-05-27
Read 2nd time, reported favorably with proposal of amendment by Senator Hashim for Committee on Judiciary
amendment-introduction,committee-passage-favorable,reading-2
2026-05-27
Reported favorably by Senator Clarkson for Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs with proposal of amendment
amendment-introduction,committee-passage-favorable
2026-05-27
Reported favorably by Senator Norris for Committee on Appropriations
committee-passage-favorable
2026-05-27
Senator(s) Hashim motion to substitute proposal of amendment; text
amendment-introduction
2026-05-27
Motion to substitute proposal of amendment agreed to
2026-05-27
Roll Call, requested by Senator Weeks, Passed -- Needed 15 of 29 to Pass -- Yeas = 17, Nays = 12
2026-05-27
Roll Call, Requested by Sen. Weeks
2026-05-27
Proposal of amendment by Senator(s) Ram Hinsdale and Chittenden; text
amendment-introduction
2026-05-27
Roll Call, requested by Senator Weeks, Passed -- Needed 15 of 29 to Pass -- Yeas = 17, Nays = 12
2026-05-27
Proposal of amendment not agreed to
amendment-introduction
2026-05-27
Proposal of amendment by Senator(s) Ram Hinsdale and Chittenden; text
amendment-introduction
2026-05-27
Proposal of amendment by Committee on Judiciary amended as recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
amendment-introduction
2026-05-27
Proposal of amendment not agreed to
amendment-introduction
2026-05-27
Proposal of amendment by Committee on Judiciary, as amended, agreed to
amendment-introduction
2026-05-27
Proposal of amendment by Committee on Judiciary amended as recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
amendment-introduction
2026-05-27
3rd reading refused on roll call, requested by Senator Ram Hinsdale, Failed -- Needed 16 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 15, Nays = 16
2026-05-27
Proposal of amendment by Committee on Judiciary, as amended, agreed to
amendment-introduction
2026-05-27
Roll Call, Requested by Sen. Ram Hinsdale
2026-05-27
3rd reading refused on roll call, requested by Senator Ram Hinsdale, Failed -- Needed 16 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 15, Nays = 16

Versions

As Passed By the House (UnofficialOpens in a new window)Compare
As Passed By the House (OfficialOpens in a new window)Compare
As IntroducedOpens in a new windowCompare
(document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

Which was agreed to on a Roll Call Passed -- Needed 71 of 141 to Pass -- Yeas = 120, Nays = 21
2026-03-25 · pass · 120-21
Member-level votes (146)
- Austin: yes
- Bartholomew: yes
- Bartley: yes
- Birong: yes
- Bishop: yes
- Black: yes
- Bluemle: yes
- Bos-Lun: yes
- Bosch: yes
- Boutin: yes
- Boyden: yes
- Brady: yes
- Branagan: yes
- Brigham: yes
- Brown: yes
- Burditt: yes
- Burke: yes
- Burkhardt: yes
- Burtt: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Canfield: yes
- Casey: yes
- Chapin: yes
- Charlton: yes
- Coffin: yes
- Conlon: yes
- Cooper: yes
- Corcoran: yes
- Critchlow: yes
- Demar: yes
- Dickinson: yes
- Dobrovich: yes
- Dolan: yes
- Dolgin: yes
- Donahue: yes
- Duke: yes
- Durfee: yes
- Emmons: yes
- Feltus: yes
- Galfetti: yes
- Garofano: yes
- Goldman: yes
- Goodnow: yes
- Goslant: yes
- Graning: yes
- Gregoire: yes
- Hango: yes
- Harple: yes
- Harvey: yes
- Higley: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Houghton: yes
- Howland: yes
- Hoyt: yes
- Hunter: yes
- James: yes
- Kascenska: yes
- Keyser: yes
- Kimbell: yes
- Kleppner: yes
- Kornheiser: yes
- Krasnow: yes
- Labor: yes
- Lalley: yes
- LaLonde: yes
- Laroche: yes
- Lipsky: yes
- Long: yes
- Lueders: yes
- Luneau: yes
- Maguire: yes
- Malay: yes
- Marcotte: yes
- Masland: yes
- McCann: yes
- McCoy: yes
- Mihaly: yes
- Minier: yes
- Morgan, L.: yes
- Morgan, M.: yes
- Morris: yes
- Morrissey: yes
- Morrow: yes
- Mrowicki: yes
- Nelson: yes
- Nielsen: yes
- Nigro: yes
- North: yes
- Noyes: yes
- Nugent: yes
- Ode: yes
- Oliver: yes
- Olson: yes
- Page: yes
- Parsons: yes
- Pezzo: yes
- Pinsonault: yes
- Pouech: yes
- Powers: yes
- Pritchard: yes
- Quimby: yes
- Satcowitz: yes
- Scheu: yes
- Sheldon: yes
- Sibilia: yes
- Southworth: yes
- Squirrell: yes
- Steady: yes
- Sweeney: yes
- Tagliavia: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Torre: yes
- Walker: yes
- Waters Evans: yes
- Wells: yes
- White: yes
- Winter: yes
- Yacovone: yes
- Arsenault: no
- Berbeco: no
- Burrows: no
- Carris Duncan: no
- Cina: no
- Cole: no
- Greer: no
- Headrick: no
- Holcombe: no
- Howard: no
- LaMont: no
- Logan: no
- McGill: no
- O'Brien: no
- Priestley: no
- Rachelson: no
- Stevens: no
- Stone: no
- Tomlinson: no
- Waszazak: no
- Bailey: not voting
- Christie: not voting
- Dodge: not voting
- Eastes: not voting
- Krowinski: not voting
- McFaun: not voting
- Micklus: not voting
- Wood: not voting
Which was disagreed to on a Roll Call Failed -- Needed 61 of 122 to Pass -- Yeas = 33, Nays = 89
2026-03-27 · fail · 33-89
Member-level votes (146)
- Berbeco: yes
- Black: yes
- Bluemle: yes
- Brown: yes
- Burke: yes
- Burkhardt: yes
- Burrows: yes
- Casey: yes
- Cole: yes
- Dodge: yes
- Duke: yes
- Garofano: yes
- Headrick: yes
- Holcombe: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hoyt: yes
- Kleppner: yes
- Krasnow: yes
- Logan: yes
- McCann: yes
- McGill: yes
- Minier: yes
- Ode: yes
- Olson: yes
- Parsons: yes
- Pouech: yes
- Priestley: yes
- Rachelson: yes
- Sibilia: yes
- Stevens: yes
- Stone: yes
- Tomlinson: yes
- Waszazak: yes
- Arsenault: no
- Austin: no
- Bartholomew: no
- Bartley: no
- Birong: no
- Bishop: no
- Bosch: no
- Boutin: no
- Boyden: no
- Brady: no
- Branagan: no
- Brigham: no
- Burditt: no
- Burtt: no
- Campbell: no
- Charlton: no
- Coffin: no
- Conlon: no
- Cooper: no
- Corcoran: no
- Critchlow: no
- Dobrovich: no
- Dolan: no
- Dolgin: no
- Donahue: no
- Durfee: no
- Emmons: no
- Feltus: no
- Galfetti: no
- Goldman: no
- Goodnow: no
- Goslant: no
- Graning: no
- Greer: no
- Hango: no
- Harple: no
- Harvey: no
- Higley: no
- Hooper: no
- Houghton: no
- Howland: no
- Hunter: no
- Kascenska: no
- Keyser: no
- Kimbell: no
- Kornheiser: no
- Labor: no
- Lalley: no
- LaLonde: no
- Laroche: no
- Lipsky: no
- Long: no
- Lueders: no
- Luneau: no
- Maguire: no
- Marcotte: no
- Masland: no
- McCoy: no
- McFaun: no
- Mihaly: no
- Morgan, L.: no
- Morris: no
- Morrissey: no
- Morrow: no
- Mrowicki: no
- Nelson: no
- Nielsen: no
- Nigro: no
- North: no
- Noyes: no
- Nugent: no
- Oliver: no
- Page: no
- Pezzo: no
- Powers: no
- Pritchard: no
- Quimby: no
- Satcowitz: no
- Sheldon: no
- Southworth: no
- Steady: no
- Sweeney: no
- Tagliavia: no
- Taylor: no
- Torre: no
- Waters Evans: no
- White: no
- Wood: no
- Bailey: not voting
- Bos-Lun: not voting
- Canfield: not voting
- Carris Duncan: not voting
- Chapin: not voting
- Christie: not voting
- Cina: not voting
- Demar: not voting
- Dickinson: not voting
- Eastes: not voting
- Gregoire: not voting
- James: not voting
- Krowinski: not voting
- LaMont: not voting
- Malay: not voting
- Micklus: not voting
- Morgan, M.: not voting
- O'Brien: not voting
- Pinsonault: not voting
- Scheu: not voting
- Squirrell: not voting
- Walker: not voting
- Wells: not voting
- Winter: not voting
- Yacovone: not voting
3rd reading refused on roll call, requested by Senator Ram Hinsdale, Failed -- Needed 16 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 15, Nays = 16
2026-05-27 · fail · 15-16
Member-level votes (30)
- Baruth: yes
- Bongartz: yes
- Clarkson: yes
- Collamore: yes
- Cummings: yes
- Gulick: yes
- Hardy: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Hashim: yes
- Lyons: yes
- Major: yes
- Perchlik: yes
- Plunkett: yes
- Watson: yes
- White: yes
- Beck: no
- Benson: no
- Brennan: no
- Brock: no
- Chittenden: no
- Heffernan: no
- Ingalls: no
- Mattos: no
- Morley: no
- Norris: no
- Ram Hinsdale: no
- Vyhovsky: no
- Weeks: no
- Westman: no
- Williams: no
Roll Call, requested by Senator Weeks, Passed -- Needed 15 of 29 to Pass -- Yeas = 17, Nays = 12
2026-05-27 · pass · 17-12
Member-level votes (30)
- Baruth: yes
- Bongartz: yes
- Chittenden: yes
- Clarkson: yes
- Cummings: yes
- Gulick: yes
- Hardy: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Hashim: yes
- Lyons: yes
- Major: yes
- Perchlik: yes
- Plunkett: yes
- Ram Hinsdale: yes
- Vyhovsky: yes
- Watson: yes
- White: yes
- Beck: no
- Benson: no
- Brennan: no
- Brock: no
- Collamore: no
- Heffernan: no
- Ingalls: no
- Morley: no
- Norris: no
- Weeks: no
- Westman: no
- Williams: no
- Mattos: not voting

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://legislature.vermont.gov/bill/loadBillRollCalls/2026/1775

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-07-31T14:11:55.325905Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=VT&identifier=H 772. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.