VA HB 962
Status unknownEmployer seeking wage or salary history of prospective employees; prohibited, etc.
Virginia · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did VA HB 962 pass?
The current status of VA HB 962 is not known from the official record. Latest recorded action (2026-02-18): Left in Labor and Commerce
What is VA HB 962 about?
Labor and employment; nondiscrimination; prohibiting employer seeking wage or salary history of prospective employees; wage or salary range transparency; predictive scheduling for large employers; causes of action; civil penalties. Prohibits an employer, labor organization, employment agency, or joint apprenticeship committee controlling an apprenticeship or other training program to discriminate based on an individual's name or address, if the individual's name or address are used as a proxy for race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, age, military status, disability, or ethnic or national origin. Additionally, the bill prohibits a prospective employer from (i) seeking the wage or salary history of a prospective employee; (ii) relying on the wage or salary history of a prospective employee in determining the wages or salary the prospective employee is to be paid upon hire; (iii) relying on the wage or salary history of a prospective employee in considering the prospective employee for employment; (iv) refusing to interview, hire, employ, or promote a prospective employee or otherwise retaliating against a prospective employee for not providing wage or salary history; and (v) failing or refusing to disclose in each public and internal posting for each job, promotion, transfer, or other employment opportunity the wage, salary, or wage or salary range. The bill establishes a cause of action for an aggrieved prospective employee or employee and provides that an employer that violates such prohibitions is liable to the aggrieved prospective employee or employee for statutory damages between $1,000 and $10,000 or actual damages, whichever is greater, reasonable attorney fees and costs, and any other legal and equitable relief as may be appropriate.The bill also requires an employer that is a retail establishment, hospitality establishment, or a food services establishment, including a chain or integrated enterprise, employing 500 or more employees worldwide to provide a written good faith estimate of each new employee's work schedule at the time of hire, to provide 14 days' advanced notice of an employee's work schedule, and to compensate employees for certain employer-requested changes that occur to an employee's work schedule without such advanced notice. The bill prohibits such an employer from scheduling or requiring an employee to work during certain required rest periods and from retaliating against an employee for inquiring about or seeking enforcement of the bill's provisions. The bill permits an employee who is unlawfully discharged, disciplined, threatened, discriminated against, or penalized in violation of its provisions to bring a civil action for certain enumerated remedies. Additionally, the bill subjects an employer who violates any of its provisions to certain civil penalties.
Who sponsors VA HB 962?
Leslie Chambers Mehta is the primary sponsor of VA HB 962.
Description
Labor and employment; nondiscrimination; prohibiting employer seeking wage or salary history of prospective employees; wage or salary range transparency; predictive scheduling for large employers; causes of action; civil penalties. Prohibits an employer, labor organization, employment agency, or joint apprenticeship committee controlling an apprenticeship or other training program to discriminate based on an individual's name or address, if the individual's name or address are used as a proxy for race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, age, military status, disability, or ethnic or national origin. Additionally, the bill prohibits a prospective employer from (i) seeking the wage or salary history of a prospective employee; (ii) relying on the wage or salary history of a prospective employee in determining the wages or salary the prospective employee is to be paid upon hire; (iii) relying on the wage or salary history of a prospective employee in considering the prospective employee for employment; (iv) refusing to interview, hire, employ, or promote a prospective employee or otherwise retaliating against a prospective employee for not providing wage or salary history; and (v) failing or refusing to disclose in each public and internal posting for each job, promotion, transfer, or other employment opportunity the wage, salary, or wage or salary range. The bill establishes a cause of action for an aggrieved prospective employee or employee and provides that an employer that violates such prohibitions is liable to the aggrieved prospective employee or employee for statutory damages between $1,000 and $10,000 or actual damages, whichever is greater, reasonable attorney fees and costs, and any other legal and equitable relief as may be appropriate.The bill also requires an employer that is a retail establishment, hospitality establishment, or a food services establishment, including a chain or integrated enterprise, employing 500 or more employees worldwide to provide a written good faith estimate of each new employee's work schedule at the time of hire, to provide 14 days' advanced notice of an employee's work schedule, and to compensate employees for certain employer-requested changes that occur to an employee's work schedule without such advanced notice. The bill prohibits such an employer from scheduling or requiring an employee to work during certain required rest periods and from retaliating against an employee for inquiring about or seeking enforcement of the bill's provisions. The bill permits an employee who is unlawfully discharged, disciplined, threatened, discriminated against, or penalized in violation of its provisions to bring a civil action for certain enumerated remedies. Additionally, the bill subjects an employer who violates any of its provisions to certain civil penalties.
- Introduced
- 2026-01-13
- Latest action
- 2026-02-18 — Left in Labor and Commerce
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Leslie Chambers Mehtaprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-01-13
Prefiled and ordered printed; Offered 01-14-2026 26105399D
filing,introduction
2026-01-13
Referred to Committee on Labor and Commerce
referral-committee
2026-02-11
Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB962)
2026-02-12
Subcommittee recommends striking from the docket (7-Y 0-N)
2026-02-18
Left in Labor and Commerce
Versions
Documents
Votes
Subcommittee recommends striking from the docket
2026-02-12 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Alfonso H. Lopez: yes
- Kelly K. Convirs-Fowler: yes
- Dan I. Helmer: yes
- Destiny LeVere Bolling: yes
- Michael B. Feggans: yes
- Chris S. Runion: yes
- Jason S. Ballard: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:35:59.552682Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=VA&identifier=HB 962. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.