TX SB 869

enacted

Relating to the deadline for the Texas Ethics Commission to resolve certain complaints.

Texas · 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) · upper

Quick answers

Did TX SB 869 pass?

Yes. TX SB 869 has been enacted into law as of 2025-06-20. Latest recorded action (2025-06-20): Effective on 9/1/25

What is TX SB 869 about?

TX SB 869 is a bill in the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) titled “Relating to the deadline for the Texas Ethics Commission to resolve certain complaints.”.

Who sponsors TX SB 869?

Birdwell, Shaheen are the primary sponsors of TX SB 869, joined by 3 cosponsors.

Introduced: 2025-01-22
Latest action: 2025-06-20 — Effective on 9/1/25
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2025-01-22
Received by the Secretary of the Senate
filing,introduction
2025-01-22
Filed
filing
2025-02-13
Read first time
introduction,reading-1
2025-02-13
Referred to State Affairs
referral-committee
2025-02-24
Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
2025-02-24
Considered in public hearing
2025-02-24
Left pending in committee
2025-03-03
Considered in public hearing
2025-03-03
Vote taken in committee
2025-03-05
Reported favorably w/o amendments
committee-passage-favorable
2025-03-05
Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
2025-03-05
Committee report printed and distributed
2025-03-11
Placed on intent calendar
2025-03-12
Co-author authorized
2025-03-12
Rules suspended-Constitutional 60-Day
2025-03-12
Rules suspended-Regular order of business
2025-03-12
Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
reading-2
2025-03-12
Vote recorded in Journal
2025-03-12
Three day rule suspended
2025-03-12
Record vote
2025-03-12
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2025-03-12
Passed
passage
2025-03-12
Record vote
2025-03-12
Reported engrossed
2025-03-13
Received from the Senate
introduction
2025-04-22
Read first time
introduction,reading-1
2025-04-22
Referred to State Affairs
referral-committee
2025-05-15
Considered in formal meeting
2025-05-15
Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-05-19
Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
filing
2025-05-19
Committee report distributed
2025-05-20
Committee report sent to Calendars
2025-05-22
Considered in Calendars
2025-05-24
Placed on General State Calendar
2025-05-27
Read 2nd time
reading-2
2025-05-27
Passed to 3rd reading
2025-05-27
Record vote
2025-05-27
Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
2025-05-28
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2025-05-28
Passed
passage
2025-05-28
Record vote
2025-05-28
Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
2025-05-28
House passage reported
passage
2025-05-28
Reported enrolled
enrolled
2025-05-30
Signed in the Senate
passage
2025-06-01
Signed in the House
passage
2025-06-01
Sent to the Governor
executive-receipt
2025-06-20
Signed by the Governor
executive-signature
2025-06-20
Effective on 9/1/25
became-law

Versions

IntroducedCompare
Senate Committee ReportCompare
EngrossedCompare
House Committee ReportCompare
EnrolledCompare
(document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 869 be placed on its third reading and final passage.
2025-03-12 · pass · 31-0
passage
2025-05-27 · pass · 119-6
Member-level votes (153)
- Alders: yes
- Allen: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Barry: yes
- Bell, C.: yes
- Bell, K.: yes
- Bernal: yes
- Bonnen: yes
- Bowers: yes
- Bryant: yes
- Buckley: yes
- Bucy: yes
- Bumgarner: yes
- Button: yes
- Cain: yes
- Capriglione: yes
- Cole: yes
- Collier: yes
- Cook: yes
- Cortez: yes
- Craddick: yes
- Cunningham: yes
- Curry: yes
- Darby: yes
- Davis, Y.: yes
- Dean: yes
- DeAyala: yes
- Dorazio: yes
- Dyson: yes
- Fairly: yes
- Flores: yes
- Frank: yes
- Garcia, L.: yes
- Garcia Hernandez: yes
- Gates: yes
- Gerdes: yes
- Geren: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Guerra: yes
- Guillen: yes
- Harless: yes
- Harris: yes
- Harris Davila: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Hayes: yes
- Hefner: yes
- Hernandez: yes
- Hickland: yes
- Hinojosa: yes
- Holt: yes
- Hopper: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hull: yes
- Isaac: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Jones, J.: yes
- Kerwin: yes
- King: yes
- Kitzman: yes
- LaHood: yes
- Lalani: yes
- Lambert: yes
- Landgraf: yes
- Leach: yes
- Leo Wilson: yes
- Little: yes
- Lopez, J.: yes
- Lopez, R.: yes
- Louderback: yes
- Lowe: yes
- Lozano: yes
- Lujan: yes
- Luther: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Fischer: yes
- McLaughlin: yes
- Metcalf: yes
- Meyer: yes
- Money: yes
- Morales, E.: yes
- Morales Shaw: yes
- Morgan: yes
- Muñoz: yes
- Noble: yes
- Olcott: yes
- Oliverson: yes
- Ordaz: yes
- Orr: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Paul: yes
- Perez, M.: yes
- Phelan: yes
- Pierson: yes
- Plesa: yes
- Raymond: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Rosenthal: yes
- Schatzline: yes
- Schofield: yes
- Schoolcraft: yes
- Shaheen: yes
- Shofner: yes
- Slawson: yes
- Smithee: yes
- Spiller: yes
- Swanson: yes
- Tepper: yes
- Tinderholt: yes
- Toth: yes
- Troxclair: yes
- Turner: yes
- VanDeaver: yes
- Villalobos: yes
- Virdell: yes
- Walle: yes
- Ward Johnson: yes
- Wharton: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Wu: yes
- Morales: no
- C: no
- Rodríguez Ramos: no
- Romero: no
- Rose: no
- Thompson: no
- Zwiene: no
- Present: not voting
- Speaker: not voting
- Vasut(C: not voting
- Absent: absent
- Anchía: absent
- Bhojani: absent
- Canales: absent
- V: absent
- Campos: absent
- Davis, A.: absent
- Dutton: absent
- Gámez: absent
- Garcia, J.: absent
- Gervin-Hawkins: absent
- González, J.: absent
- González, M.: absent
- Hunter: absent
- Jones, V.: absent
- Longoria: absent
- Manuel: absent
- McQueeney: absent
- Meza: absent
- Moody: absent
- Perez, V.: absent
- Reynolds: absent
- Simmons: absent
- Talarico: absent
passage
2025-05-28 · pass · 128-8
Member-level votes (153)
- Alders: yes
- Allen: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Barry: yes
- Bell, C.: yes
- Bell, K.: yes
- Bernal: yes
- Bhojani: yes
- Bonnen: yes
- Bowers: yes
- Buckley: yes
- Button: yes
- Cain: yes
- Campos: yes
- Canales: yes
- Capriglione: yes
- Cole: yes
- Collier: yes
- Cook: yes
- Craddick: yes
- Cunningham: yes
- Curry: yes
- Darby: yes
- Davis, A.: yes
- Davis, Y.: yes
- DeAyala: yes
- Dorazio: yes
- Dutton: yes
- Dyson: yes
- Fairly: yes
- Flores: yes
- Frank: yes
- Gámez: yes
- Garcia, J.: yes
- Garcia, L.: yes
- Garcia Hernandez: yes
- Gates: yes
- Gerdes: yes
- Geren: yes
- Gervin-Hawkins: yes
- González, M.: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Guillen: yes
- Harris Davila: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Hayes: yes
- Hefner: yes
- Hernandez: yes
- Hickland: yes
- Holt: yes
- Hopper: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hull: yes
- Hunter: yes
- Isaac: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Jones, J.: yes
- Jones, V.: yes
- Kerwin: yes
- King: yes
- Kitzman: yes
- LaHood: yes
- Lalani: yes
- Lambert: yes
- Landgraf: yes
- Leach: yes
- Leo Wilson: yes
- Little: yes
- Lopez, R.: yes
- Louderback: yes
- Lowe: yes
- Lozano: yes
- Lujan: yes
- Luther: yes
- Manuel: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Fischer: yes
- McLaughlin: yes
- McQueeney: yes
- Metcalf: yes
- Meyer: yes
- Money: yes
- Moody: yes
- Morales, E.: yes
- Morales Shaw: yes
- Morgan: yes
- Muñoz: yes
- Noble: yes
- Olcott: yes
- Oliverson: yes
- Ordaz: yes
- Orr: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Paul: yes
- Perez, M.: yes
- Perez, V.: yes
- Phelan: yes
- Pierson: yes
- Plesa: yes
- Raymond: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Romero: yes
- Rosenthal: yes
- Schatzline: yes
- Schofield: yes
- Schoolcraft: yes
- Shaheen: yes
- Shofner: yes
- Simmons: yes
- Slawson: yes
- Smithee: yes
- Spiller: yes
- Tepper: yes
- Thompson: yes
- Tinderholt: yes
- Toth: yes
- Troxclair: yes
- Turner: yes
- VanDeaver: yes
- Villalobos: yes
- Virdell: yes
- Vo: yes
- Walle: yes
- Ward Johnson: yes
- Wharton: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Wu: yes
- Zwiener: yes
- Bumgarner: no
- González, J.: no
- Meza: no
- Morales, C.: no
- Reynolds: no
- Rodríguez Ramos: no
- Rose: no
- Swanson: no
- Present: not voting
- Speaker: not voting
- Vasut(C: not voting
- Absent: absent
- Anchía: absent
- Guerra: absent
- Harris: absent
- Hinojosa: absent
- Longoria: absent
- Talaric: absent
- Bryant: absent
- Bucy: absent
- Cortez: absent
- Dean: absent
- Harless: absent
- Lopez: absent
- J: absent

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

ftp://ftp.legis.state.tx.us/bills/89R/billhistory/senate_bills/SB00800_SB00899/SB 869.xml

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:33:51.767464Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=TX&identifier=SB 869. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.
Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.