TX SB 529
enactedRelating to the entitlement of certain municipalities to receive and use tax revenue from certain establishments located near a hotel and convention center project.
Texas · 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did TX SB 529 pass?
Yes. TX SB 529 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-05-30): Effective immediately
What is TX SB 529 about?
TX SB 529 is a bill in the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) titled “Relating to the entitlement of certain municipalities to receive and use tax revenue from certain establishments located near a hotel and convention center project.”.
Who sponsors TX SB 529?
Sparks, Craddick are the primary sponsors of TX SB 529.
- Introduced
- 2024-12-05
- Latest action
- 2025-05-30 — Effective immediately
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Sparksprimary
- Craddickprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2025-05-30
Effective immediately
became-law
2025-05-30
Signed by the Governor
executive-signature
2025-05-21
Sent to the Governor
executive-receipt
2025-05-21
Signed in the House
passage
2025-05-21
Signed in the Senate
passage
2025-05-21
Senate concurs in House amendment(s)-reported
2025-05-21
Reported enrolled
enrolled
2025-05-20
Record vote
2025-05-20
Senate concurs in House amendment(s)
2025-05-20
Read
2025-05-20
House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
2025-05-14
House passage as amended reported
amendment-passage
2025-05-13
Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
2025-05-13
Record vote
2025-05-13
Passed
passage
2025-05-13
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2025-05-12
Committee report sent to Calendars
2025-05-12
Passed to 3rd reading as amended
amendment-passage
2025-05-12
Amended
amendment-passage
2025-05-12
Read 2nd time
reading-2
2025-05-12
Laid out in lieu of companion
2025-05-12
Committee report distributed
2025-05-12
Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
filing
2025-05-09
Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-05-09
Considered in formal meeting
2025-05-02
Referred to Ways & Means
referral-committee
2025-05-02
Read first time
introduction,reading-1
2025-05-01
Received from the Senate
introduction
2025-04-30
Reported engrossed
2025-04-30
Record vote
2025-04-30
Passed
passage
2025-04-30
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2025-04-30
Record vote
2025-04-30
Three day rule suspended
2025-04-30
Record vote
2025-04-30
Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
reading-2
2025-04-30
Record vote
2025-04-30
Rules suspended-Regular order of business
2025-04-29
Placed on intent calendar
2025-04-07
Committee report printed and distributed
2025-04-07
Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
2025-04-07
Reported favorably w/o amendments
committee-passage-favorable
2025-04-02
Vote taken in committee
2025-04-02
Considered in public hearing
2025-03-24
Left pending in committee
2025-03-24
Testimony taken in committee
2025-03-24
Considered in public hearing
2025-03-24
Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
2025-02-03
Referred to Economic Development
referral-committee
2025-02-03
Read first time
introduction,reading-1
2024-12-05
Filed
filing
2024-12-05
Received by the Secretary of the Senate
filing,introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
passage
2025-04-30 · pass · 27-4
Member-level votes (31)
- Alvarado: yes
- Bettencourt: yes
- Birdwell: yes
- Blanco: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Cook: yes
- Creighton: yes
- Eckhardt: yes
- Flores: yes
- Gutierrez: yes
- Hagenbuch: yes
- A. Hinojosa: yes
- J. Hinojosa: yes
- Huffman: yes
- Johnson: yes
- King: yes
- Kolkhorst: yes
- Menéndez: yes
- Miles: yes
- Nichols: yes
- Parker: yes
- Paxton: yes
- Perry: yes
- Schwertner: yes
- Sparks: yes
- West: yes
- Zaffirini: yes
- Hall: no
- Hancock: no
- Hughes: no
- Middleton: no
Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 529 be placed on its third reading and final passage.
2025-04-30 · pass · 27-4
Member-level votes (31)
- Alvarado: yes
- Bettencourt: yes
- Birdwell: yes
- Blanco: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Cook: yes
- Creighton: yes
- Eckhardt: yes
- Flores: yes
- Gutierrez: yes
- Hagenbuch: yes
- A. Hinojosa: yes
- J. Hinojosa: yes
- Huffman: yes
- Johnson: yes
- King: yes
- Kolkhorst: yes
- Menéndez: yes
- Miles: yes
- Nichols: yes
- Parker: yes
- Paxton: yes
- Perry: yes
- Schwertner: yes
- Sparks: yes
- West: yes
- Zaffirini: yes
- Hall: no
- Hancock: no
- Hughes: no
- Middleton: no
passage
2025-05-13 · pass · 108-33
Member-level votes (154)
- Allen: yes
- Anchía: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Barry: yes
- Bell, C.: yes
- Bell, K.: yes
- Bernal: yes
- Bhojani: yes
- Bonnen: yes
- Bowers: yes
- Bryant: yes
- Buckley: yes
- Bucy: yes
- Bumgarner: yes
- Button: yes
- Campos: yes
- Canales: yes
- Capriglione: yes
- Cole: yes
- Collier: yes
- Cortez: yes
- Craddick: yes
- Cunningham: yes
- Curry: yes
- Darby: yes
- Davis, A.: yes
- Davis, Y.: yes
- Dean: yes
- DeAyala: yes
- Dutton: yes
- Dyson: yes
- Flores: yes
- Frank: yes
- Gámez: yes
- Garcia, J.: yes
- Garcia, L.: yes
- Garcia Hernandez: yes
- Gates: yes
- Gerdes: yes
- Geren: yes
- González, J.: yes
- González, M.: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Guerra: yes
- Guillen: yes
- Harless: yes
- Harris Davila: yes
- Hefner: yes
- Hernandez: yes
- Hinojosa: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hull: yes
- Hunter: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Jones, J.: yes
- Kerwin: yes
- King: yes
- Kitzman: yes
- Lalani: yes
- Lambert: yes
- Landgraf: yes
- Longoria: yes
- Lopez, J.: yes
- Lopez, R.: yes
- Louderback: yes
- Lozano: yes
- Lujan: yes
- Manuel: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Fischer: yes
- McLaughlin: yes
- McQueeney: yes
- Metcalf: yes
- Meyer: yes
- Meza: yes
- Moody: yes
- Morales, C.: yes
- Morales, E.: yes
- Morales Shaw: yes
- Muñoz: yes
- Noble: yes
- Ordaz: yes
- Orr: yes
- Paul: yes
- Perez, M.: yes
- Perez, V.: yes
- Phelan: yes
- Plesa: yes
- Raymond: yes
- Reynolds: yes
- Rodríguez Ramos: yes
- Romero: yes
- Rose: yes
- Rosenthal: yes
- Smithee: yes
- Talarico: yes
- Tepper: yes
- Thompson: yes
- Troxclair: yes
- Turner: yes
- VanDeaver: yes
- Villalobos: yes
- Vo: yes
- Walle: yes
- Ward Johnson: yes
- Wharton: yes
- Wu: yes
- Zwiener: yes
- Alders: no
- Cain: no
- Cook: no
- Dorazio: no
- Fairly: no
- Harrison: no
- Hickland: no
- Holt: no
- Hopper: no
- Isaac: no
- LaHood: no
- Leo Wilson: no
- Little: no
- Lowe: no
- Luther: no
- Money: no
- Morgan: no
- Olcott: no
- Oliverson: no
- Patterson: no
- Pierson: no
- Richardson: no
- Schatzline: no
- Schoolcraft: no
- Shaheen: no
- Shofner: no
- Slawson: no
- Spiller: no
- Swanson: no
- Tinderholt: no
- Toth: no
- Vasut: no
- Wilson: no
- Present: not voting
- Speaker: not voting
- Harris(C: not voting
- Absent: absent
- Gervin-Hawkins: absent
- Schofield: absent
- Simmon: absent
- Excused: absent
- Leach: absent
- Hayes: absent
- Jones: absent
- V: absent
- Virdel: absent
passage
2025-05-20 · pass · 27-4
Member-level votes (31)
- Alvarado: yes
- Bettencourt: yes
- Birdwell: yes
- Blanco: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Cook: yes
- Creighton: yes
- Eckhardt: yes
- Flores: yes
- Gutierrez: yes
- Hagenbuch: yes
- A. Hinojosa: yes
- J. Hinojosa: yes
- Huffman: yes
- Johnson: yes
- King: yes
- Kolkhorst: yes
- Menéndez: yes
- Miles: yes
- Nichols: yes
- Parker: yes
- Paxton: yes
- Perry: yes
- Schwertner: yes
- Sparks: yes
- West: yes
- Zaffirini: yes
- Hall: no
- Hancock: no
- Hughes: no
- Middleton: no
Related bills
- Companion bill: HB 1186
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:33:51.767464Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=TX&identifier=SB 529. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.