Bill Commons

TX SB 1152

died on adjournment

Relating to creating the criminal offense of continuous manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance.

Texas · 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) · upper

Quick answers

Did TX SB 1152 pass?

No. TX SB 1152 died when the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2025-05-26): Placed on General State Calendar

What is TX SB 1152 about?

TX SB 1152 is a bill in the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) titled “Relating to creating the criminal offense of continuous manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance.”.

Who sponsors TX SB 1152?

Huffman, Kitzman are the primary sponsors of TX SB 1152.

Introduced
2025-02-06
Latest action
2025-05-26 — Placed on General State Calendar
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Huffmanprimary
  • Kitzmanprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-06

    Received by the Secretary of the Senate

    filing,introduction

  2. 2025-02-06

    Filed

    filing

  3. 2025-02-28

    Read first time

    introduction,reading-1

  4. 2025-02-28

    Referred to Criminal Justice

    referral-committee

  5. 2025-04-15

    Scheduled for public hearing on . . .

  6. 2025-04-15

    Considered in public hearing

  7. 2025-04-15

    Vote taken in committee

  8. 2025-04-16

    Reported favorably w/o amendments

    committee-passage-favorable

  9. 2025-04-16

    Committee report printed and distributed

  10. 2025-04-23

    Placed on intent calendar

  11. 2025-04-24

    Rules suspended-Regular order of business

  12. 2025-04-24

    Record vote

  13. 2025-04-24

    Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment

    reading-2

  14. 2025-04-24

    Record vote

  15. 2025-04-24

    Three day rule suspended

  16. 2025-04-24

    Record vote

  17. 2025-04-24

    Read 3rd time

    reading-3

  18. 2025-04-24

    Passed

    passage

  19. 2025-04-24

    Record vote

  20. 2025-04-24

    Reported engrossed

  21. 2025-04-25

    Received from the Senate

    introduction

  22. 2025-04-28

    Read first time

    introduction,reading-1

  23. 2025-04-28

    Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence

    referral-committee

  24. 2025-05-21

    Considered in formal meeting

  25. 2025-05-21

    Left pending in committee

  26. 2025-05-22

    Considered in formal meeting

  27. 2025-05-22

    Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  28. 2025-05-23

    Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator

    filing

  29. 2025-05-23

    Committee report distributed

  30. 2025-05-23

    Committee report sent to Calendars

  31. 2025-05-24

    Considered in Calendars

  32. 2025-05-26

    Placed on General State Calendar

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • passage

    2025-04-24 · pass · 26-5

    Member-level votes (31)
    • Alvarado: yes
    • Bettencourt: yes
    • Birdwell: yes
    • Blanco: yes
    • Campbell: yes
    • Creighton: yes
    • Flores: yes
    • Gutierrez: yes
    • Hagenbuch: yes
    • Hall: yes
    • Hancock: yes
    • A. Hinojosa: yes
    • J. Hinojosa: yes
    • Huffman: yes
    • Hughes: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • King: yes
    • Kolkhorst: yes
    • Middleton: yes
    • Nichols: yes
    • Parker: yes
    • Paxton: yes
    • Perry: yes
    • Schwertner: yes
    • Sparks: yes
    • West: yes
    • Cook: no
    • Eckhardt: no
    • Menéndez: no
    • Miles: no
    • Zaffirini: no

  • Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 1152 be placed on its third reading and final passage.

    2025-04-24 · pass · 26-5

    Member-level votes (31)
    • Alvarado: yes
    • Bettencourt: yes
    • Birdwell: yes
    • Blanco: yes
    • Campbell: yes
    • Creighton: yes
    • Flores: yes
    • Gutierrez: yes
    • Hagenbuch: yes
    • Hall: yes
    • Hancock: yes
    • A. Hinojosa: yes
    • J. Hinojosa: yes
    • Huffman: yes
    • Hughes: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • King: yes
    • Kolkhorst: yes
    • Middleton: yes
    • Nichols: yes
    • Parker: yes
    • Paxton: yes
    • Perry: yes
    • Schwertner: yes
    • Sparks: yes
    • West: yes
    • Cook: no
    • Eckhardt: no
    • Menéndez: no
    • Miles: no
    • Zaffirini: no

Related bills

Official source

ftp://ftp.legis.state.tx.us/bills/89R/billhistory/senate_bills/SB01100_SB01199/SB 1152.xml

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:33:51.767464Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=TX&identifier=SB 1152. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.