TX SB 1057
enactedRelating to the submission and approval of certain proposals by shareholders of nationally listed corporations.
Texas · 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) · upper
Quick answers
Did TX SB 1057 pass?
Yes. TX SB 1057 has been enacted into law as of 2025-05-19. Latest recorded action (2025-05-19): Effective on 9/1/25
What is TX SB 1057 about?
TX SB 1057 is a bill in the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) titled “Relating to the submission and approval of certain proposals by shareholders of nationally listed corporations.”.
Who sponsors TX SB 1057?
Parker, Meyer, Button and 2 others are the primary sponsors of TX SB 1057, joined by 1 cosponsor.
- Introduced
- 2025-02-03
- Latest action
- 2025-05-19 — Effective on 9/1/25
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Parkerprimary
- Meyerprimary
- Buttonprimary
- Anchíaprimary
- Capriglioneprimary
- Blancocosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-02-03
Received by the Secretary of the Senate
filing,introduction
2025-02-03
Filed
filing
2025-02-24
Read first time
introduction,reading-1
2025-02-24
Referred to Business & Commerce
referral-committee
2025-03-18
Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
2025-03-18
Considered in public hearing
2025-03-18
Testimony taken in committee
2025-03-18
Left pending in committee
2025-03-27
Considered in public hearing
2025-03-27
Vote taken in committee
2025-03-31
Reported favorably as substituted
committee-passage-favorable
2025-03-31
Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
2025-03-31
Committee report printed and distributed
2025-04-01
Co-author authorized
2025-04-08
Placed on intent calendar
2025-04-10
Rules suspended-Regular order of business
2025-04-10
Record vote
2025-04-10
Read 2nd time
reading-2
2025-04-10
Amendment(s) offered
amendment-introduction
2025-04-10
Amended
amendment-passage
2025-04-10
Vote recorded in Journal
2025-04-10
Passed to engrossment as amended
amendment-passage
2025-04-10
Record vote
2025-04-10
Three day rule suspended
2025-04-10
Record vote
2025-04-10
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2025-04-10
Passed
passage
2025-04-10
Record vote
2025-04-10
Reported engrossed
2025-04-14
Received from the Senate
introduction
2025-04-17
Read first time
introduction,reading-1
2025-04-17
Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development
referral-committee
2025-04-30
Considered in public hearing
2025-04-30
Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-05-01
Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
filing
2025-05-01
Committee report distributed
2025-05-02
Committee report sent to Calendars
2025-05-05
Laid out in lieu of companion
2025-05-05
Read 2nd time
reading-2
2025-05-05
Passed to 3rd reading
2025-05-06
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2025-05-06
Passed
passage
2025-05-06
Record vote
2025-05-06
Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
2025-05-06
House passage reported
passage
2025-05-06
Reported enrolled
enrolled
2025-05-07
Signed in the Senate
passage
2025-05-07
Signed in the House
passage
2025-05-07
Sent to the Governor
executive-receipt
2025-05-19
Signed by the Governor
executive-signature
2025-05-19
Effective on 9/1/25
became-law
Versions
Documents
Votes
passage
2025-04-10 · pass · 27-3
Member-level votes (31)
- Alvarado: yes
- Bettencourt: yes
- Birdwell: yes
- Blanco: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Creighton: yes
- Flores: yes
- Gutierrez: yes
- Hagenbuch: yes
- Hall: yes
- Hancock: yes
- A. Hinojosa: yes
- J. Hinojosa: yes
- Huffman: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Kolkhorst: yes
- Menéndez: yes
- Middleton: yes
- Nichols: yes
- Parker: yes
- Paxton: yes
- Perry: yes
- Schwertner: yes
- Sparks: yes
- West: yes
- Zaffirini: yes
- Cook: no
- Eckhardt: no
- Miles: no
- King: absent
Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 1057 be placed on its third reading and final passage.
2025-04-10 · pass · 27-3
Member-level votes (31)
- Alvarado: yes
- Bettencourt: yes
- Birdwell: yes
- Blanco: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Creighton: yes
- Flores: yes
- Gutierrez: yes
- Hagenbuch: yes
- Hall: yes
- Hancock: yes
- A. Hinojosa: yes
- J. Hinojosa: yes
- Huffman: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Kolkhorst: yes
- Menéndez: yes
- Middleton: yes
- Nichols: yes
- Parker: yes
- Paxton: yes
- Perry: yes
- Schwertner: yes
- Sparks: yes
- West: yes
- Zaffirini: yes
- Cook: no
- Eckhardt: no
- Miles: no
- King: absent
adoption of Floor Amendment No. 1
2025-04-10 · pass · 0-0
passage
2025-05-06 · pass · 140-5
Member-level votes (154)
- Alders: yes
- Allen: yes
- Anchía: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Barry: yes
- Bell, C.: yes
- Bell, K.: yes
- Bernal: yes
- Bhojani: yes
- Bonnen: yes
- Bowers: yes
- Bryant: yes
- Buckley: yes
- Bucy: yes
- Bumgarner: yes
- Button: yes
- Cain: yes
- Campos: yes
- Canales: yes
- Capriglione: yes
- Cole: yes
- Collier: yes
- Cook: yes
- Cortez: yes
- Craddick: yes
- Cunningham: yes
- Curry: yes
- Darby: yes
- Davis, A.: yes
- Dean: yes
- DeAyala: yes
- Dorazio: yes
- Dutton: yes
- Dyson: yes
- Fairly: yes
- Flores: yes
- Frank: yes
- Gámez: yes
- Garcia, L.: yes
- Garcia Hernandez: yes
- Gates: yes
- Gerdes: yes
- Geren: yes
- Gervin-Hawkins: yes
- González, J.: yes
- González, M.: yes
- Guerra: yes
- Guillen: yes
- Harless: yes
- Harris: yes
- Harris Davila: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Hayes: yes
- Hefner: yes
- Hernandez: yes
- Hickland: yes
- Hinojosa: yes
- Holt: yes
- Hopper: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hull: yes
- Hunter: yes
- Isaac: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Jones, V.: yes
- Kerwin: yes
- King: yes
- Kitzman: yes
- LaHood: yes
- Lalani: yes
- Lambert: yes
- Landgraf: yes
- Leach: yes
- Leo Wilson: yes
- Little: yes
- Longoria: yes
- Lopez, R.: yes
- Louderback: yes
- Lowe: yes
- Lozano: yes
- Lujan: yes
- Luther: yes
- Manuel: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Fischer: yes
- McLaughlin: yes
- McQueeney: yes
- Metcalf: yes
- Meyer: yes
- Money: yes
- Moody: yes
- Morales, E.: yes
- Morales Shaw: yes
- Morgan: yes
- Muñoz: yes
- Noble: yes
- Olcott: yes
- Oliverson: yes
- Ordaz: yes
- Orr: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Paul: yes
- Perez, M.: yes
- Perez, V.: yes
- Phelan: yes
- Pierson: yes
- Plesa: yes
- Raymond: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Romero: yes
- Rose: yes
- Rosenthal: yes
- Schatzline: yes
- Schofield: yes
- Schoolcraft: yes
- Shaheen: yes
- Shofner: yes
- Simmons: yes
- Slawson: yes
- Smithee: yes
- Spiller: yes
- Swanson: yes
- Talarico: yes
- Tepper: yes
- Thompson: yes
- Tinderholt: yes
- Toth: yes
- Troxclair: yes
- Turner: yes
- VanDeaver: yes
- Vasut: yes
- Villalobos: yes
- Virdell: yes
- Vo: yes
- Walle: yes
- Ward Johnson: yes
- Wharton: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Wu: yes
- Zwiener: yes
- Goodwin: no
- Meza: no
- Morales: no
- C: no
- Reynolds: no
- Rodríguez Ramo: no
- Present: not voting
- Mr. Speaker(C): not voting
- Davis: absent
- Y: absent
- Garcia: absent
- J: absent
- Jones: absent
- Lopez: absent
Related bills
- Companion bill: HB 4115
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:33:51.767464Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=TX&identifier=SB 1057. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.