TX HB 632

died on adjournment

Relating to the regulation of the practice of pharmacy.

Texas · 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) · lower

Quick answers

Did TX HB 632 pass?

No. TX HB 632 died when the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2025-05-28): Placed on intent calendar

What is TX HB 632 about?

TX HB 632 is a bill in the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) titled “Relating to the regulation of the practice of pharmacy.”.

Who sponsors TX HB 632?

Bucy, Hughes are the primary sponsors of TX HB 632, joined by 2 cosponsors.

Introduced: 2025-03-04
Latest action: 2025-05-28 — Placed on intent calendar
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2024-11-12
Filed
filing
2025-03-04
Read first time
introduction,reading-1
2025-03-04
Referred to s/c on Dis Prev & Women's & Children's Health by Speaker
referral-committee
2025-04-17
Scheduled for public hearing in s/c on . . .
2025-04-17
Considered by s/c in public hearing
2025-04-17
Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in subcommittee
2025-04-17
Left pending in subcommittee
2025-04-24
Recalled from subcommittee
2025-04-24
Considered in formal meeting
2025-04-24
Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-04-29
Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
filing
2025-04-29
Committee report distributed
2025-04-29
Committee report sent to Calendars
2025-05-02
Considered in Calendars
2025-05-05
Placed on General State Calendar
2025-05-05
Read 2nd time
reading-2
2025-05-05
Passed to engrossment
2025-05-06
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2025-05-06
Passed
passage
2025-05-06
Record vote
2025-05-06
Reported engrossed
2025-05-07
Received from the House
introduction
2025-05-07
Read first time
introduction,reading-1
2025-05-07
Referred to Health & Human Services
referral-committee
2025-05-22
Posting rule suspended
2025-05-23
Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
2025-05-23
Considered in public hearing
2025-05-23
Testimony taken in committee
2025-05-23
Left pending in committee
2025-05-26
Considered in public hearing
2025-05-26
Vote taken in committee
2025-05-26
Reported favorably w/o amendments
committee-passage-favorable
2025-05-26
Committee report printed and distributed
2025-05-28
Co-sponsor authorized
2025-05-28
Placed on intent calendar

Versions

IntroducedCompare
House Committee ReportCompare
EngrossedCompare
Senate Committee ReportCompare
(document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

passage
2025-05-06 · pass · 146-0
Member-level votes (152)
- Alders: yes
- Allen: yes
- Anchía: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Barry: yes
- Bell, C.: yes
- Bell, K.: yes
- Bernal: yes
- Bhojani: yes
- Bonnen: yes
- Bowers: yes
- Bryant: yes
- Buckley: yes
- Bucy: yes
- Bumgarner: yes
- Button: yes
- Cain: yes
- Campos: yes
- Canales: yes
- Capriglione: yes
- Cole: yes
- Collier: yes
- Cook: yes
- Cortez: yes
- Craddick: yes
- Cunningham: yes
- Curry: yes
- Darby: yes
- Davis, A.: yes
- Davis, Y.: yes
- Dean: yes
- DeAyala: yes
- Dorazio: yes
- Dutton: yes
- Dyson: yes
- Fairly: yes
- Flores: yes
- Frank: yes
- Gámez: yes
- Garcia, J.: yes
- Garcia, L.: yes
- Garcia Hernandez: yes
- Gates: yes
- Gerdes: yes
- Geren: yes
- Gervin-Hawkins: yes
- González, J.: yes
- González, M.: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Guerra: yes
- Guillen: yes
- Harless: yes
- Harris: yes
- Harris Davila: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Hayes: yes
- Hefner: yes
- Hernandez: yes
- Hickland: yes
- Hinojosa: yes
- Holt: yes
- Hopper: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hull: yes
- Hunter: yes
- Isaac: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Jones, J.: yes
- Kerwin: yes
- Kitzman: yes
- LaHood: yes
- Lalani: yes
- Lambert: yes
- Landgraf: yes
- Leach: yes
- Leo Wilson: yes
- Little: yes
- Longoria: yes
- Lopez, J.: yes
- Lopez, R.: yes
- Louderback: yes
- Lowe: yes
- Lozano: yes
- Lujan: yes
- Luther: yes
- Manuel: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Fischer: yes
- McLaughlin: yes
- McQueeney: yes
- Metcalf: yes
- Meyer: yes
- Meza: yes
- Money: yes
- Moody: yes
- Morales, C.: yes
- Morales, E.: yes
- Morales Shaw: yes
- Morgan: yes
- Muñoz: yes
- Noble: yes
- Olcott: yes
- Oliverson: yes
- Ordaz: yes
- Orr: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Paul: yes
- Perez, M.: yes
- Perez, V.: yes
- Phelan: yes
- Pierson: yes
- Plesa: yes
- Raymond: yes
- Reynolds: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Rodríguez Ramos: yes
- Romero: yes
- Rose: yes
- Rosenthal: yes
- Schatzline: yes
- Schofield: yes
- Schoolcraft: yes
- Shaheen: yes
- Shofner: yes
- Slawson: yes
- Smithee: yes
- Spiller: yes
- Swanson: yes
- Talarico: yes
- Tepper: yes
- Thompson: yes
- Tinderholt: yes
- Toth: yes
- Troxclair: yes
- Turner: yes
- VanDeaver: yes
- Vasut: yes
- Villalobos: yes
- Virdell: yes
- Vo: yes
- Walle: yes
- Ward Johnson: yes
- Wharton: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Wu: yes
- Zwiener: yes
- Present: not voting
- Mr. Speaker(C): not voting
- Jones: absent
- V: absent
- King: absent
- Simmon: absent

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

ftp://ftp.legis.state.tx.us/bills/89R/billhistory/house_bills/HB00600_HB00699/HB 632.xml

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:33:51.767464Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=TX&identifier=HB 632. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.
Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.