Bill Commons

TX HB 3069

died on adjournment

Relating to the approval of a certificate of convenience and necessity for certain transmission projects.

Texas · 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) · lower

Quick answers

Did TX HB 3069 pass?

No. TX HB 3069 died when the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2025-05-22): Left pending in committee

What is TX HB 3069 about?

TX HB 3069 is a bill in the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) titled “Relating to the approval of a certificate of convenience and necessity for certain transmission projects.”.

Who sponsors TX HB 3069?

Darby, Schwertner are the primary sponsors of TX HB 3069.

Introduced
2025-03-20
Latest action
2025-05-22 — Left pending in committee
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Darbyprimary
  • Schwertnerprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-20

    Filed

    filing

  2. 2025-03-20

    Read first time

    introduction,reading-1

  3. 2025-03-20

    Referred to State Affairs

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-26

    Considered in public hearing

  5. 2025-03-26

    Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee

  6. 2025-03-26

    Left pending in committee

  7. 2025-04-09

    Considered in public hearing

  8. 2025-04-09

    Committee substitute considered in committee

    substitution

  9. 2025-04-09

    Reported favorably as substituted

    committee-passage-favorable

  10. 2025-04-16

    Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator

    filing

  11. 2025-04-16

    Committee report distributed

  12. 2025-04-17

    Committee report sent to Calendars

  13. 2025-05-02

    Considered in Calendars

  14. 2025-05-05

    Placed on General State Calendar

  15. 2025-05-05

    Read 2nd time

    reading-2

  16. 2025-05-05

    Passed to engrossment

  17. 2025-05-06

    Read 3rd time

    reading-3

  18. 2025-05-06

    Passed

    passage

  19. 2025-05-06

    Record vote

  20. 2025-05-06

    Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal

  21. 2025-05-06

    Reported engrossed

  22. 2025-05-06

    Received from the House

    introduction

  23. 2025-05-07

    Read first time

    introduction,reading-1

  24. 2025-05-07

    Referred to Business & Commerce

    referral-committee

  25. 2025-05-22

    Scheduled for public hearing on . . .

  26. 2025-05-22

    Considered in public hearing

  27. 2025-05-22

    Testimony taken in committee

  28. 2025-05-22

    Left pending in committee

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • passage

    2025-05-06 · pass · 137-9

    Member-level votes (151)
    • Alders: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Anchía: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Barry: yes
    • Bell, C.: yes
    • Bell, K.: yes
    • Bernal: yes
    • Bhojani: yes
    • Bonnen: yes
    • Bowers: yes
    • Bryant: yes
    • Buckley: yes
    • Bucy: yes
    • Bumgarner: yes
    • Campos: yes
    • Canales: yes
    • Capriglione: yes
    • Cole: yes
    • Collier: yes
    • Cook: yes
    • Cortez: yes
    • Craddick: yes
    • Cunningham: yes
    • Curry: yes
    • Darby: yes
    • Davis, A.: yes
    • Davis, Y.: yes
    • Dean: yes
    • DeAyala: yes
    • Dutton: yes
    • Dyson: yes
    • Fairly: yes
    • Flores: yes
    • Frank: yes
    • Gámez: yes
    • Garcia, J.: yes
    • Garcia, L.: yes
    • Garcia Hernandez: yes
    • Gates: yes
    • Gerdes: yes
    • Geren: yes
    • Gervin-Hawkins: yes
    • González, J.: yes
    • González, M.: yes
    • Goodwin: yes
    • Guerra: yes
    • Guillen: yes
    • Harless: yes
    • Harris: yes
    • Harris Davila: yes
    • Hayes: yes
    • Hefner: yes
    • Hernandez: yes
    • Hickland: yes
    • Hinojosa: yes
    • Holt: yes
    • Hopper: yes
    • Howard: yes
    • Hull: yes
    • Hunter: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Jones, J.: yes
    • Jones, V.: yes
    • Kerwin: yes
    • King: yes
    • Kitzman: yes
    • LaHood: yes
    • Lalani: yes
    • Lambert: yes
    • Landgraf: yes
    • Leach: yes
    • Leo Wilson: yes
    • Little: yes
    • Longoria: yes
    • Lopez, J.: yes
    • Lopez, R.: yes
    • Louderback: yes
    • Lowe: yes
    • Lozano: yes
    • Lujan: yes
    • Luther: yes
    • Manuel: yes
    • Martinez: yes
    • Fischer: yes
    • McLaughlin: yes
    • McQueeney: yes
    • Metcalf: yes
    • Meyer: yes
    • Meza: yes
    • Moody: yes
    • Morales, C.: yes
    • Morales, E.: yes
    • Morales Shaw: yes
    • Muñoz: yes
    • Noble: yes
    • Oliverson: yes
    • Ordaz: yes
    • Orr: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Paul: yes
    • Perez, M.: yes
    • Perez, V.: yes
    • Phelan: yes
    • Pierson: yes
    • Plesa: yes
    • Raymond: yes
    • Reynolds: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Rodríguez Ramos: yes
    • Romero: yes
    • Rose: yes
    • Rosenthal: yes
    • Schofield: yes
    • Schoolcraft: yes
    • Shaheen: yes
    • Shofner: yes
    • Simmons: yes
    • Smithee: yes
    • Swanson: yes
    • Talarico: yes
    • Tepper: yes
    • Thompson: yes
    • Tinderholt: yes
    • Toth: yes
    • Troxclair: yes
    • Turner: yes
    • VanDeaver: yes
    • Villalobos: yes
    • Virdell: yes
    • Vo: yes
    • Walle: yes
    • Ward Johnson: yes
    • Wharton: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Wu: yes
    • Zwiener: yes
    • Cain: no
    • Dorazio: no
    • Harrison: no
    • Isaac: no
    • Money: no
    • Olcott: no
    • Slawson: no
    • Spiller: no
    • Vasut: no
    • Present: not voting
    • Mr. Speaker(C): not voting
    • Button: absent
    • Morgan: absent
    • Schatzlin: absent

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:33:51.767464Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=TX&identifier=HB 3069. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.