SD SCR 602

died on adjournment

celebrating the sister-state relationship with Taiwan.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Quick answers

Did SD SCR 602 pass?

No. SD SCR 602 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-01-29): House of Representatives Concurred in Resolution , Passed, YEAS 66, NAYS 0 H.J. 174

What is SD SCR 602 about?

SD SCR 602 is a concurrent resolution in the 2026 Regular Session titled “celebrating the sister-state relationship with Taiwan.”.

Who sponsors SD SCR 602?

Wipf, Weems, Walburg and 32 others are the primary sponsors of SD SCR 602.

Introduced: 2026-01-23
Latest action: 2026-01-29 — House of Representatives Concurred in Resolution , Passed, YEAS 66, NAYS 0 H.J. 174
Bill type: concurrent resolution
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2026-01-23
First read in Senate and referral to committee waived pursuant to JR 6D-1 S.J. 90
introduction,reading-1
2026-01-26
Senate Adopt Resolution , Passed, YEAS 33, NAYS 0 S.J. 109
2026-01-27
First Reading House H.J. 147
2026-01-28
Committee referral waived pursuant to JR 6D-1 H.J. 162
2026-01-29
House of Representatives Concurred in Resolution , Passed, YEAS 66, NAYS 0 H.J. 174

Versions

Introduced — 2026-01-22Compare
Enrolled — 2026-02-02Compare

Documents

Votes

Adopt Resolution
2026-01-26 · pass · 33-0
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: yes
- Carley: yes
- Crabtree: yes
- Davis: yes
- Deibert: yes
- Duhamel: yes
- Foster: excused
- Grove: yes
- Hohn: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hulse: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): yes
- Karr: yes
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
- Lapka: yes
- Larson: yes
- Marty: yes
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Miskimins: yes
- Nelson: yes
- Otten: yes
- Perry: yes
- Peterson (Sue): yes
- Pischke: yes
- Reed: yes
- Rohl: yes
- Sauder: yes
- Schoenfish: yes
- Smith: yes
- Vilhauer: yes
- Voight: yes
- Voita: yes
- Wipf: yes
- Zikmund: yes
Concurred in Resolution
2026-01-29 · pass · 66-0
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: yes
- Auch: yes
- Aylward: yes
- Bahmuller: yes
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: yes
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: excused
- Derby: yes
- Duffy: yes
- Emery: yes
- Fitzgerald: yes
- Fosness: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Goodwin: excused
- Gosch: yes
- Greenfield: yes
- Halverson: yes
- Healy: yes
- Heermann: yes
- Heinemann: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: yes
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): yes
- Jordan: yes
- Jorgenson: yes
- Kassin: yes
- Kayser: yes
- Kolbeck (Jack): yes
- Kull: yes
- Ladner: yes
- Lems: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Massie: yes
- May: yes
- Moore: yes
- Mortenson: yes
- Muckey: yes
- Mulally: yes
- Mulder: yes
- Nolz: yes
- Novstrup: yes
- Odenbach: yes
- Overweg: yes
- Peterson (Drew): yes
- Pourier: yes
- Randolph: yes
- Rehfeldt: yes
- Reimer: yes
- Reisch: yes
- Rice: yes
- Roby: yes
- Roe: yes
- Schaefbauer: yes
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: excused
- Shubeck: yes
- Sjaarda: yes
- Soye: yes
- Stevens: yes
- Uhre-Balk: yes
- Van Diepen: yes
- Walburg: yes
- Weems: yes
- Weisgram: yes
- Wittman: yes
- Hansen: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Bills/27018

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=SCR 602. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.