Bill Commons

SD SB 92

died on adjournment

clarify the rights to appeal and refer certain decisions of boards of county commissioners.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did SD SB 92 pass?

No. SD SB 92 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-02-12): House of Representatives Tabled , Passed, YEAS 61, NAYS 1 H.J. 322

What is SD SB 92 about?

SD SB 92 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “clarify the rights to appeal and refer certain decisions of boards of county commissioners.”.

Who sponsors SD SB 92?

Randolph, Pischke, Jordan and 5 others are the primary sponsors of SD SB 92.

Introduced
2026-01-15
Latest action
2026-02-12 — House of Representatives Tabled , Passed, YEAS 61, NAYS 1 H.J. 322
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Randolphprimary
  • Pischkeprimary
  • Jordanprimary
  • Jensen (Phil)primary
  • Garciaprimary
  • Baxterprimary
  • Nelsonprimary
  • Auchprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-02-12

    House of Representatives Tabled , Passed, YEAS 61, NAYS 1 H.J. 322

  2. 2026-02-11

    Remove from Consent Calendar H.J. 295

  3. 2026-02-10

    Certified uncontested, placed on consent , Passed,

  4. 2026-02-10

    Local Government Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 11, NAYS 0

    committee-passage

  5. 2026-02-10

    Scheduled for hearing

  6. 2026-02-03

    First read in House and referred to House Local Government H.J. 208

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

  7. 2026-02-02

    Senate Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 34, NAYS 0 S.J. 162

  8. 2026-01-28

    Local Government Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 0 S.J. 2

  9. 2026-01-28

    Local Government Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 2 Amendment 92A

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage

  10. 2026-01-28

    Scheduled for hearing

  11. 2026-01-23

    Scheduled for hearing

  12. 2026-01-15

    First read in Senate and referred to Senate Local Government S.J. 55

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do Pass Amended

    2026-01-28 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Nelson: yes
    • Rohl: yes
    • Schoenfish: yes
    • Smith: yes
    • Wipf: yes
    • Duhamel: yes
    • Reed: yes

  • Do Pass Amended

    2026-02-02 · pass · 34-0

    Member-level votes (35)
    • Beal: excused
    • Blanc: yes
    • Carley: yes
    • Crabtree: yes
    • Davis: yes
    • Deibert: yes
    • Duhamel: yes
    • Foster: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Hohn: yes
    • Howard: yes
    • Hulse: yes
    • Jensen (Kevin): yes
    • Karr: yes
    • Kolbeck (Steve): yes
    • Lapka: yes
    • Larson: yes
    • Marty: yes
    • Mehlhaff: yes
    • Miskimins: yes
    • Nelson: yes
    • Otten: yes
    • Perry: yes
    • Peterson (Sue): yes
    • Pischke: yes
    • Reed: yes
    • Rohl: yes
    • Sauder: yes
    • Schoenfish: yes
    • Smith: yes
    • Vilhauer: yes
    • Voight: yes
    • Voita: yes
    • Wipf: yes
    • Zikmund: yes

  • Do Pass

    2026-02-10 · pass · 11-0

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Andera: yes
    • Bathke: excused
    • DeGroot: yes
    • Fitzgerald: yes
    • Heermann: yes
    • Jensen (Phil): yes
    • Kull: yes
    • Mulally: yes
    • Roby: yes
    • Van Diepen: yes
    • Wittman: yes
    • Ladner: excused
    • Jamison: yes

  • Tabled

    2026-02-12 · pass · 61-1

    Member-level votes (70)
    • Andera: yes
    • Arlint: yes
    • Auch: yes
    • Aylward: yes
    • Bahmuller: yes
    • Bathke: excused
    • Baxter: yes
    • Czmowski: yes
    • DeGroot: yes
    • Derby: yes
    • Duffy: yes
    • Emery: yes
    • Fitzgerald: yes
    • Fosness: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Goodwin: excused
    • Gosch: excused
    • Greenfield: yes
    • Halverson: yes
    • Healy: yes
    • Heermann: yes
    • Heinemann: yes
    • Hughes: yes
    • Hunt: yes
    • Ismay: yes
    • Jamison: yes
    • Jensen (Phil): yes
    • Jordan: yes
    • Jorgenson: yes
    • Kassin: yes
    • Kayser: yes
    • Kolbeck (Jack): yes
    • Kull: yes
    • Ladner: yes
    • Lems: yes
    • Manhart: yes
    • Massie: yes
    • May: yes
    • Moore: excused
    • Mortenson: excused
    • Muckey: yes
    • Mulally: excused
    • Mulder: no
    • Nolz: yes
    • Novstrup: yes
    • Odenbach: yes
    • Overweg: yes
    • Peterson (Drew): yes
    • Pourier: yes
    • Randolph: yes
    • Rehfeldt: excused
    • Reimer: yes
    • Reisch: yes
    • Rice: yes
    • Roby: yes
    • Roe: yes
    • Schaefbauer: yes
    • Schwans: yes
    • Shorma: yes
    • Shubeck: yes
    • Sjaarda: yes
    • Soye: excused
    • Stevens: yes
    • Uhre-Balk: yes
    • Van Diepen: yes
    • Walburg: yes
    • Weems: yes
    • Weisgram: yes
    • Wittman: yes
    • Hansen: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Bills/26859

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this sessionSession dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=SB 92. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.