SD SB 91

enacted

clarify the procedure for petitioning a board of county commissioners for a change to the comprehensive plan or zoning ordinances.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did SD SB 91 pass?

Yes. SD SB 91 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-02-23): Signed by the Governor on 2026-02-23 S.J. 350

What is SD SB 91 about?

SD SB 91 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “clarify the procedure for petitioning a board of county commissioners for a change to the comprehensive plan or zoning ordinances.”.

Who sponsors SD SB 91?

Perry, Novstrup, Moore and 8 others are the primary sponsors of SD SB 91.

Introduced: 2026-01-15
Latest action: 2026-02-23 — Signed by the Governor on 2026-02-23 S.J. 350
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

2026-02-23
Signed by the Governor on 2026-02-23 S.J. 350
executive-signature,executive-signature
2026-02-17
Delivered to the Governor on 2026-02-17 S.J. 268
executive-receipt
2026-02-12
Signed by the Speaker H.J. 324
passage
2026-02-12
Signed by the President S.J. 264
passage
2026-02-11
House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 63, NAYS 3 H.J. 295
2026-02-10
Certified uncontested, placed on consent , Passed,
2026-02-10
Local Government Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 10, NAYS 0
committee-passage
2026-02-10
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-03
First read in House and referred to House Local Government H.J. 208
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-02
Senate Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 34, NAYS 0 S.J. 162
2026-01-28
Certified uncontested, placed on consent , Passed, S.J. 1
2026-01-28
Local Government Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 0 S.J. 1
2026-01-28
Local Government Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 1 Amendment 91B
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-01-28
Scheduled for hearing
2026-01-23
Scheduled for hearing
2026-01-15
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Local Government S.J. 55
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

Introduced — 2026-01-15Compare
Senate Local Government Engrossed — 2026-01-28Compare
Enrolled — 2026-02-12Compare
91BCompare

Documents

Votes

Do Pass Amended
2026-01-28 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Nelson: yes
- Rohl: yes
- Schoenfish: yes
- Smith: yes
- Wipf: yes
- Duhamel: yes
- Reed: yes
Do Pass
2026-02-02 · pass · 34-0
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: yes
- Carley: yes
- Crabtree: yes
- Davis: yes
- Deibert: yes
- Duhamel: yes
- Foster: yes
- Grove: yes
- Hohn: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hulse: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): yes
- Karr: yes
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
- Lapka: yes
- Larson: yes
- Marty: yes
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Miskimins: yes
- Nelson: yes
- Otten: yes
- Perry: yes
- Peterson (Sue): yes
- Pischke: yes
- Reed: yes
- Rohl: yes
- Sauder: yes
- Schoenfish: yes
- Smith: yes
- Vilhauer: yes
- Voight: yes
- Voita: yes
- Wipf: yes
- Zikmund: yes
Do Pass
2026-02-10 · pass · 10-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Andera: yes
- Bathke: excused
- DeGroot: yes
- Fitzgerald: yes
- Heermann: excused
- Jensen (Phil): yes
- Kull: yes
- Mulally: yes
- Roby: yes
- Van Diepen: yes
- Wittman: yes
- Ladner: excused
- Jamison: yes
Do Pass
2026-02-11 · pass · 63-3
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: yes
- Auch: yes
- Aylward: yes
- Bahmuller: yes
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: yes
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: yes
- Derby: yes
- Duffy: yes
- Emery: yes
- Fitzgerald: yes
- Fosness: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Goodwin: excused
- Gosch: yes
- Greenfield: yes
- Halverson: yes
- Healy: yes
- Heermann: yes
- Heinemann: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: yes
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): no
- Jordan: no
- Jorgenson: yes
- Kassin: yes
- Kayser: yes
- Kolbeck (Jack): yes
- Kull: yes
- Ladner: yes
- Lems: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Massie: yes
- May: yes
- Moore: yes
- Mortenson: excused
- Muckey: yes
- Mulally: no
- Mulder: yes
- Nolz: yes
- Novstrup: yes
- Odenbach: yes
- Overweg: yes
- Peterson (Drew): yes
- Pourier: yes
- Randolph: yes
- Rehfeldt: yes
- Reimer: yes
- Reisch: yes
- Rice: yes
- Roby: yes
- Roe: yes
- Schaefbauer: yes
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: yes
- Shubeck: yes
- Sjaarda: yes
- Soye: excused
- Stevens: yes
- Uhre-Balk: yes
- Van Diepen: yes
- Walburg: yes
- Weems: yes
- Weisgram: yes
- Wittman: yes
- Hansen: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Bills/26742

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this session Session dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=SB 91. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.