Bill Commons

SD SB 62

dead

discontinue the issuance of new Class B electrician licenses.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Quick answers

Did SD SB 62 pass?

No. SD SB 62 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-01-26). Latest recorded action (2026-01-26): Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 14, NAYS 20 S.J. 114

What is SD SB 62 about?

SD SB 62 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “discontinue the issuance of new Class B electrician licenses.”.

Who sponsors SD SB 62?

Commerce and Energy is the primary sponsor of SD SB 62.

Introduced
2026-01-13
Latest action
2026-01-26 — Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 14, NAYS 20 S.J. 114
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Commerce and Energyprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2026-01-13

    First read in Senate and referred to Senate Commerce and Energy S.J. 10

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

  2. 2026-01-15

    Scheduled for hearing

  3. 2026-01-22

    Scheduled for hearing S.J. 1

  4. 2026-01-22

    Commerce and Energy Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 4

    committee-passage

  5. 2026-01-23

    Senate Deferred to another day , Passed, S.J. 91

  6. 2026-01-26

    Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 14, NAYS 20 S.J. 114

    failure

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do Pass

    2026-01-22 · pass · 5-4

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Mehlhaff: yes
    • Deibert: yes
    • Hohn: no
    • Karr: no
    • Kolbeck (Steve): yes
    • Larson: yes
    • Perry: no
    • Peterson (Sue): no
    • Crabtree: yes
  • Do Pass

    2026-01-26 · fail · 14-20

    Member-level votes (35)
    • Beal: excused
    • Blanc: no
    • Carley: no
    • Crabtree: yes
    • Davis: yes
    • Deibert: yes
    • Duhamel: yes
    • Foster: no
    • Grove: no
    • Hohn: no
    • Howard: no
    • Hulse: no
    • Jensen (Kevin): no
    • Karr: no
    • Kolbeck (Steve): yes
    • Lapka: no
    • Larson: yes
    • Marty: no
    • Mehlhaff: yes
    • Miskimins: yes
    • Nelson: no
    • Otten: yes
    • Perry: no
    • Peterson (Sue): no
    • Pischke: no
    • Reed: yes
    • Rohl: no
    • Sauder: yes
    • Schoenfish: no
    • Smith: yes
    • Vilhauer: yes
    • Voight: no
    • Voita: no
    • Wipf: yes
    • Zikmund: no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=SB 62. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.