SD SB 239
died on adjournmentmodify provisions relating to the reinvestment payment program, and relating to the purchasing of goods and services used by projects approved for the reinvestment payment program.
South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Quick answers
Did SD SB 239 pass?
No. SD SB 239 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-02-24): Senate Reconsidered , Passed, YEAS 16, NAYS 17 S.J. 373
What is SD SB 239 about?
SD SB 239 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “modify provisions relating to the reinvestment payment program, and relating to the purchasing of goods and services used by projects approved for the reinvestment payment program.”.
Who sponsors SD SB 239?
Schoenfish, Crabtree are the primary sponsors of SD SB 239.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-18
- Latest action
- 2026-02-24 — Senate Reconsidered , Passed, YEAS 16, NAYS 17 S.J. 373
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Schoenfishprimary
- Crabtreeprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-02-04
First Reading Senate S.J. 180
2026-02-05
Referred to Senate State Affairs S.J. 199
referral-committee
2026-02-18
Scheduled for hearing S.J. 1
2026-02-18
State Affairs Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 27 Amendment 239B
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-02-18
State Affairs Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 6, NAYS 3 S.J. 27
2026-02-23
Senate Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 17, NAYS 16 S.J. 362
2026-02-23
Intent to reconsider , Passed, S.J. 363
2026-02-24
Senate Reconsidered , Passed, YEAS 16, NAYS 17 S.J. 373
Versions
Documents
Votes
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-18 · pass · 6-3
Member-level votes (9)
- Deibert: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): no
- Karr: no
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
- Larson: yes
- Pischke: yes
- Voight: no
- Perry: yes
- Mehlhaff: yes
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-23 · pass · 17-16
Member-level votes (35)
- Pischke: excused
- Reed: yes
- Rohl: yes
- Sauder: yes
- Schoenfish: yes
- Smith: yes
- Vilhauer: yes
- Voight: no
- Voita: no
- Wipf: yes
- Zikmund: yes
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: no
- Carley: no
- Crabtree: yes
- Davis: yes
- Deibert: yes
- Duhamel: yes
- Foster: no
- Grove: no
- Hohn: no
- Howard: no
- Hulse: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): no
- Karr: no
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
- Lapka: no
- Larson: yes
- Marty: no
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Miskimins: yes
- Nelson: no
- Otten: no
- Perry: no
- Peterson (Sue): no
Reconsidered
2026-02-24 · fail · 16-17
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: no
- Carley: absent
- Crabtree: yes
- Davis: yes
- Deibert: yes
- Duhamel: yes
- Foster: no
- Grove: no
- Hohn: no
- Howard: no
- Hulse: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): no
- Karr: no
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
- Lapka: no
- Larson: yes
- Marty: no
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Miskimins: yes
- Nelson: no
- Otten: no
- Perry: no
- Peterson (Sue): no
- Pischke: no
- Reed: yes
- Rohl: yes
- Sauder: yes
- Schoenfish: yes
- Smith: no
- Vilhauer: yes
- Voight: no
- Voita: no
- Wipf: yes
- Zikmund: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=SB 239. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.