Bill Commons

SD SB 224

died on adjournment

provide a rebuttable presumption in favor of joint physical custody of a minor child.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Quick answers

Did SD SB 224 pass?

No. SD SB 224 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-03-04): Judiciary Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0

What is SD SB 224 about?

SD SB 224 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “provide a rebuttable presumption in favor of joint physical custody of a minor child.”.

Who sponsors SD SB 224?

Pischke is the primary sponsor of SD SB 224.

Introduced
2026-02-04
Latest action
2026-03-04 — Judiciary Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Pischkeprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2026-02-04

    First read in Senate and referred to Senate Judiciary S.J. 179

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

  2. 2026-02-17

    Scheduled for hearing

  3. 2026-02-17

    Judiciary Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 3

    committee-passage

  4. 2026-02-18

    Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 20, NAYS 14 S.J. 297

    passage

  5. 2026-02-19

    First Reading House H.J. 367

  6. 2026-02-23

    Referred to House Judiciary H.J. 417

    referral-committee

  7. 2026-03-04

    Scheduled for hearing

  8. 2026-03-04

    Judiciary Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do Pass

    2026-02-17 · pass · 4-3

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Blanc: yes
    • Duhamel: no
    • Grove: no
    • Mehlhaff: no
    • Pischke: yes
    • Hulse: yes
    • Kolbeck (Steve): yes
  • Do Pass

    2026-02-18 · pass · 20-14

    Member-level votes (35)
    • Beal: excused
    • Blanc: yes
    • Carley: yes
    • Crabtree: yes
    • Davis: no
    • Deibert: no
    • Duhamel: no
    • Foster: no
    • Grove: no
    • Hohn: yes
    • Howard: yes
    • Hulse: yes
    • Jensen (Kevin): yes
    • Karr: yes
    • Kolbeck (Steve): yes
    • Lapka: yes
    • Larson: no
    • Marty: yes
    • Mehlhaff: no
    • Miskimins: no
    • Nelson: yes
    • Otten: no
    • Perry: yes
    • Peterson (Sue): no
    • Pischke: yes
    • Reed: no
    • Rohl: yes
    • Sauder: no
    • Schoenfish: yes
    • Smith: no
    • Vilhauer: no
    • Voight: yes
    • Voita: yes
    • Wipf: yes
    • Zikmund: yes
  • Deferred to the 41st legislative day

    2026-03-04 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Mortenson: yes
    • Reisch: yes
    • Walburg: excused
    • Roby: yes
    • Fitzgerald: yes
    • Reimer: yes
    • Wittman: yes
    • Massie: yes
    • Kull: yes
    • Pourier: yes
    • Hunt: yes
    • Hughes: yes
    • Stevens: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=SB 224. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.