SD SB 224
died on adjournmentprovide a rebuttable presumption in favor of joint physical custody of a minor child.
South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Quick answers
Did SD SB 224 pass?
No. SD SB 224 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-03-04): Judiciary Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0
What is SD SB 224 about?
SD SB 224 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “provide a rebuttable presumption in favor of joint physical custody of a minor child.”.
Who sponsors SD SB 224?
Pischke is the primary sponsor of SD SB 224.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-04
- Latest action
- 2026-03-04 — Judiciary Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Pischkeprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-02-04
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Judiciary S.J. 179
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-17
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-17
Judiciary Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 3
committee-passage
2026-02-18
Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 20, NAYS 14 S.J. 297
passage
2026-02-19
First Reading House H.J. 367
2026-02-23
Referred to House Judiciary H.J. 417
referral-committee
2026-03-04
Scheduled for hearing
2026-03-04
Judiciary Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0
Versions
- Introduced — 2026-02-04Compare
Documents
Votes
Do Pass
2026-02-17 · pass · 4-3
Member-level votes (7)
- Blanc: yes
- Duhamel: no
- Grove: no
- Mehlhaff: no
- Pischke: yes
- Hulse: yes
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
Do Pass
2026-02-18 · pass · 20-14
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: yes
- Carley: yes
- Crabtree: yes
- Davis: no
- Deibert: no
- Duhamel: no
- Foster: no
- Grove: no
- Hohn: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hulse: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): yes
- Karr: yes
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
- Lapka: yes
- Larson: no
- Marty: yes
- Mehlhaff: no
- Miskimins: no
- Nelson: yes
- Otten: no
- Perry: yes
- Peterson (Sue): no
- Pischke: yes
- Reed: no
- Rohl: yes
- Sauder: no
- Schoenfish: yes
- Smith: no
- Vilhauer: no
- Voight: yes
- Voita: yes
- Wipf: yes
- Zikmund: yes
Deferred to the 41st legislative day
2026-03-04 · pass · 12-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Mortenson: yes
- Reisch: yes
- Walburg: excused
- Roby: yes
- Fitzgerald: yes
- Reimer: yes
- Wittman: yes
- Massie: yes
- Kull: yes
- Pourier: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Stevens: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=SB 224. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.