SD SB 218
died on adjournmentprovide for the establishment of charter schools.
South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Quick answers
Did SD SB 218 pass?
No. SD SB 218 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-02-20): Senate Reconsidered , Passed, YEAS 17, NAYS 16 S.J. 339
What is SD SB 218 about?
SD SB 218 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “provide for the establishment of charter schools.”.
Who sponsors SD SB 218?
Voight, Soye, Rice and 19 others are the primary sponsors of SD SB 218.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-04
- Latest action
- 2026-02-20 — Senate Reconsidered , Passed, YEAS 17, NAYS 16 S.J. 339
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Voightprimary
- Soyeprimary
- Riceprimary
- Pischkeprimary
- Perryprimary
- Mehlhaffprimary
- Manhartprimary
- Kayserprimary
- Jordanprimary
- Jensen (Phil)primary
- Huntprimary
- Howardprimary
- Hohnprimary
- Groveprimary
- Garciaprimary
- Blancprimary
- Baxterprimary
- Aylwardprimary
- Auchprimary
- Anderaprimary
- Schwansprimary
- Nelsonprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-02-04
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Education S.J. 179
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-17
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-17
Education Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 13 Amendment 218A
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-02-17
Education Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 3 S.J. 13
2026-02-19
Senate Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 314 Amendment 218C
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-02-19
Senate Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 17, NAYS 17 S.J. 314
2026-02-19
Intent to reconsider , Passed, S.J. 315
2026-02-20
Senate Reconsidered , Passed, YEAS 17, NAYS 16 S.J. 339
Versions
Documents
Votes
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-17 · pass · 4-3
Member-level votes (7)
- Marty: yes
- Nelson: yes
- Peterson (Sue): yes
- Sauder: no
- Smith: no
- Voight: yes
- Schoenfish: no
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-19 · fail · 17-17
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: yes
- Carley: yes
- Crabtree: no
- Davis: no
- Deibert: no
- Duhamel: no
- Foster: yes
- Grove: yes
- Hohn: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hulse: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): yes
- Karr: yes
- Kolbeck (Steve): no
- Lapka: yes
- Larson: no
- Marty: yes
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Miskimins: no
- Nelson: yes
- Otten: no
- Perry: no
- Peterson (Sue): yes
- Pischke: yes
- Reed: no
- Rohl: no
- Sauder: no
- Schoenfish: no
- Smith: no
- Vilhauer: no
- Voight: yes
- Voita: yes
- Wipf: no
- Zikmund: no
Reconsidered
2026-02-20 · pass · 17-16
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: yes
- Carley: yes
- Crabtree: no
- Davis: no
- Deibert: yes
- Duhamel: no
- Foster: yes
- Grove: yes
- Hohn: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hulse: no
- Jensen (Kevin): yes
- Karr: excused
- Kolbeck (Steve): no
- Lapka: yes
- Larson: no
- Marty: yes
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Miskimins: no
- Nelson: yes
- Otten: no
- Perry: yes
- Peterson (Sue): yes
- Pischke: yes
- Reed: no
- Rohl: no
- Sauder: no
- Schoenfish: no
- Smith: no
- Vilhauer: no
- Voight: yes
- Voita: yes
- Wipf: no
- Zikmund: no
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=SB 218. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.