SD SB 195

dead

repeal the expiration of a reduction in certain gross receipts and use tax rates.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Quick answers

Did SD SB 195 pass?

No. SD SB 195 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-18). Latest recorded action (2026-02-18): Senate Reconsidered , Passed, YEAS 16, NAYS 17 S.J. 295

What is SD SB 195 about?

SD SB 195 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “repeal the expiration of a reduction in certain gross receipts and use tax rates.”.

Who sponsors SD SB 195?

Voita, Perry, Overweg and 5 others are the primary sponsors of SD SB 195.

Introduced: 2026-01-29
Latest action: 2026-02-18 — Senate Reconsidered , Passed, YEAS 16, NAYS 17 S.J. 295
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2026-01-29
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Committee on Appropriations S.J. 139
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-06
Scheduled for hearing S.J. 1
2026-02-06
Committee on Appropriations Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 6, NAYS 3 S.J. 1
committee-passage
2026-02-09
Senate Deferred to another day , Passed, S.J. 220
2026-02-12
Senate Deferred to another day , Passed, S.J. 259
2026-02-17
Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 17, NAYS 17 S.J. 280
failure
2026-02-17
Intent to reconsider , Passed, S.J. 280
2026-02-18
Senate Reconsidered , Passed, YEAS 16, NAYS 17 S.J. 295

Versions

Introduced — 2026-01-29Compare

Documents

Votes

Do Pass
2026-02-06 · pass · 6-3
Member-level votes (9)
- Miskimins: no
- Vilhauer: no
- Carley: yes
- Voita: yes
- Howard: yes
- Foster: yes
- Zikmund: no
- Lapka: yes
- Otten: yes
Do Pass
2026-02-17 · fail · 17-17
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: yes
- Carley: yes
- Crabtree: no
- Davis: no
- Deibert: no
- Duhamel: no
- Foster: yes
- Grove: yes
- Hohn: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hulse: no
- Jensen (Kevin): yes
- Karr: yes
- Kolbeck (Steve): no
- Lapka: yes
- Larson: no
- Marty: yes
- Mehlhaff: no
- Miskimins: no
- Nelson: yes
- Otten: yes
- Perry: yes
- Peterson (Sue): yes
- Pischke: yes
- Reed: no
- Rohl: no
- Sauder: no
- Schoenfish: no
- Smith: no
- Vilhauer: no
- Voight: yes
- Voita: yes
- Wipf: no
- Zikmund: no
Reconsidered
2026-02-18 · fail · 16-17
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: yes
- Carley: yes
- Crabtree: no
- Davis: no
- Deibert: no
- Duhamel: no
- Foster: no
- Grove: yes
- Hohn: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hulse: no
- Jensen (Kevin): yes
- Karr: yes
- Kolbeck (Steve): no
- Lapka: yes
- Larson: no
- Marty: yes
- Mehlhaff: no
- Miskimins: no
- Nelson: yes
- Otten: yes
- Perry: yes
- Peterson (Sue): yes
- Pischke: yes
- Reed: no
- Rohl: excused
- Sauder: no
- Schoenfish: no
- Smith: no
- Vilhauer: no
- Voight: yes
- Voita: yes
- Wipf: no
- Zikmund: no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Bills/27010

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=SB 195. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.