SD SB 193
deadclarify the definition of backup electric generation.
South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Quick answers
Did SD SB 193 pass?
No. SD SB 193 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-23). Latest recorded action (2026-02-23): Intent to reconsider , Passed, S.J. 364
What is SD SB 193 about?
SD SB 193 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “clarify the definition of backup electric generation.”.
Who sponsors SD SB 193?
Crabtree is the primary sponsor of SD SB 193.
- Introduced
- 2026-01-29
- Latest action
- 2026-02-23 — Intent to reconsider , Passed, S.J. 364
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Crabtreeprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-01-29
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Commerce and Energy S.J. 138
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-19
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-19
Commerce and Energy Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 3
committee-passage
2026-02-20
Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 17, NAYS 17 S.J. 344
failure
2026-02-20
Intent to reconsider , Passed, S.J. 344
2026-02-23
Senate Reconsidered , Passed, YEAS 17, NAYS 17 S.J. 355
2026-02-23
Senate Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 363 Amendment 193C
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-02-23
Senate Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 17, NAYS 17 S.J. 363
2026-02-23
Intent to reconsider , Passed, S.J. 364
Versions
Documents
Votes
Do Pass
2026-02-19 · pass · 5-3
Member-level votes (9)
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Deibert: yes
- Hohn: no
- Karr: excused
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
- Larson: yes
- Perry: no
- Peterson (Sue): no
- Crabtree: yes
Do Pass
2026-02-20 · fail · 17-17
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: no
- Carley: no
- Crabtree: yes
- Davis: yes
- Deibert: yes
- Duhamel: yes
- Foster: no
- Grove: no
- Hohn: no
- Howard: no
- Hulse: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): no
- Karr: no
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
- Lapka: no
- Larson: yes
- Marty: no
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Miskimins: yes
- Nelson: no
- Otten: no
- Perry: no
- Peterson (Sue): no
- Pischke: no
- Reed: yes
- Rohl: yes
- Sauder: yes
- Schoenfish: yes
- Smith: yes
- Vilhauer: yes
- Voight: no
- Voita: no
- Wipf: yes
- Zikmund: yes
Reconsidered
2026-02-23 · fail · 17-17
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: no
- Carley: no
- Crabtree: yes
- Davis: yes
- Deibert: yes
- Duhamel: yes
- Foster: no
- Grove: no
- Hohn: no
- Howard: no
- Hulse: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): no
- Karr: no
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
- Lapka: no
- Larson: yes
- Marty: no
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Miskimins: yes
- Nelson: no
- Otten: no
- Perry: no
- Peterson (Sue): no
- Pischke: no
- Reed: yes
- Rohl: yes
- Sauder: yes
- Schoenfish: yes
- Smith: yes
- Vilhauer: yes
- Voight: no
- Voita: no
- Wipf: yes
- Zikmund: yes
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-23 · fail · 17-17
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: no
- Carley: no
- Crabtree: yes
- Davis: yes
- Deibert: yes
- Duhamel: yes
- Foster: no
- Grove: no
- Hohn: no
- Howard: no
- Hulse: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): no
- Karr: no
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
- Lapka: no
- Larson: yes
- Marty: no
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Miskimins: yes
- Nelson: no
- Otten: no
- Perry: no
- Peterson (Sue): no
- Pischke: no
- Reed: yes
- Rohl: yes
- Sauder: yes
- Schoenfish: yes
- Smith: yes
- Vilhauer: yes
- Voight: no
- Voita: no
- Wipf: yes
- Zikmund: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=SB 193. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.