SD SB 120
died on adjournmentmake an appropriation for the economic development of South Dakota.
South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Quick answers
Did SD SB 120 pass?
No. SD SB 120 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-03-09): House of Representatives Tabled , Passed, YEAS 66, NAYS 3 H.J. 542
What is SD SB 120 about?
SD SB 120 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “make an appropriation for the economic development of South Dakota.”.
Who sponsors SD SB 120?
Otten is the primary sponsor of SD SB 120.
- Introduced
- 2026-01-26
- Latest action
- 2026-03-09 — House of Representatives Tabled , Passed, YEAS 66, NAYS 3 H.J. 542
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Ottenprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-01-26
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Committee on Appropriations S.J. 111
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-23
Scheduled for hearing S.J. 1
2026-02-23
Committee on Appropriations Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 1
committee-passage
2026-02-24
Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 33, NAYS 0 S.J. 376
passage
2026-02-25
First read in House and referred to House Committee on Appropriations H.J. 445
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-03-05
Scheduled for hearing H.J. 1
2026-03-05
Committee on Appropriations Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 9, NAYS 0
committee-passage
2026-03-09
House of Representatives Tabled , Passed, YEAS 66, NAYS 3 H.J. 542
Versions
- Introduced — 2026-01-23Compare
Documents
Votes
Do Pass
2026-02-23 · pass · 7-1
Member-level votes (9)
- Miskimins: yes
- Vilhauer: yes
- Carley: no
- Voita: absent
- Howard: yes
- Foster: yes
- Zikmund: yes
- Lapka: yes
- Otten: yes
Do Pass
2026-02-24 · pass · 33-0
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: yes
- Carley: absent
- Crabtree: yes
- Davis: yes
- Deibert: yes
- Duhamel: yes
- Foster: yes
- Grove: yes
- Hohn: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hulse: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): yes
- Karr: yes
- Kolbeck (Steve): yes
- Lapka: yes
- Larson: yes
- Marty: yes
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Miskimins: yes
- Nelson: yes
- Otten: yes
- Perry: yes
- Peterson (Sue): yes
- Pischke: yes
- Reed: yes
- Rohl: yes
- Sauder: yes
- Schoenfish: yes
- Smith: yes
- Vilhauer: yes
- Voight: yes
- Voita: yes
- Wipf: yes
- Zikmund: yes
Do Pass
2026-03-05 · pass · 9-0
Member-level votes (9)
- Auch: yes
- Kassin: yes
- Kolbeck (Jack): yes
- Muckey: yes
- Moore: yes
- Sjaarda: yes
- Jorgenson: yes
- Novstrup: yes
- Derby: yes
Tabled
2026-03-09 · pass · 66-3
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: yes
- Auch: yes
- Aylward: yes
- Bahmuller: yes
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: yes
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: yes
- Derby: yes
- Duffy: yes
- Emery: yes
- Fitzgerald: yes
- Fosness: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Gosch: no
- Greenfield: yes
- Halverson: yes
- Healy: yes
- Heermann: no
- Heinemann: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: yes
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): yes
- Jordan: yes
- Jorgenson: yes
- Kassin: yes
- Kayser: yes
- Kolbeck (Jack): yes
- Kull: yes
- Ladner: yes
- Lems: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Massie: yes
- May: yes
- Moore: yes
- Mortenson: yes
- Muckey: yes
- Mulally: yes
- Mulder: yes
- Nolz: yes
- Novstrup: yes
- Odenbach: yes
- Overweg: yes
- Peterson (Drew): yes
- Pourier: yes
- Randolph: yes
- Rehfeldt: yes
- Reimer: yes
- Reisch: no
- Rice: yes
- Roby: yes
- Roe: yes
- Schaefbauer: yes
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: yes
- Shubeck: yes
- Sjaarda: yes
- Soye: yes
- Stevens: yes
- Uhre-Balk: yes
- Van Diepen: yes
- Walburg: yes
- Weems: yes
- Weisgram: yes
- Wittman: yes
- Hansen: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=SB 120. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.