SD HB 1317
deadeliminate a limit on the accumulation of the unused index factor for property taxation.
South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did SD HB 1317 pass?
No. SD HB 1317 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-20). Latest recorded action (2026-02-20): Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6 , Passed, YEAS 34, NAYS 33 H.J. 386
What is SD HB 1317 about?
SD HB 1317 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “eliminate a limit on the accumulation of the unused index factor for property taxation.”.
Who sponsors SD HB 1317?
Kayser, Jensen (Phil), Hunt and 4 others are the primary sponsors of SD HB 1317.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-02-20 — Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6 , Passed, YEAS 34, NAYS 33 H.J. 386
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Kayserprimary
- Jensen (Phil)primary
- Huntprimary
- Garciaprimary
- Baxterprimary
- Auchprimary
- Ismayprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-02-04
First Reading House H.J. 220
2026-02-05
Referred to House Taxation H.J. 237
referral-committee
2026-02-19
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-19
Taxation Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 6 H.J. 9
committee-failure
2026-02-19
Taxation Report out of committee without recommendation , Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 4 H.J. 9
2026-02-20
Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6 , Passed, YEAS 34, NAYS 33 H.J. 386
Versions
- Introduced — 2026-02-04Compare
Documents
Votes
Do Pass
2026-02-19 · fail · 5-6
Member-level votes (13)
- Czmowski: excused
- Jensen (Phil): yes
- Massie: no
- Mortenson: no
- Pourier: yes
- Randolph: yes
- Reimer: no
- Roe: no
- Walburg: excused
- Weems: no
- Weisgram: no
- Hughes: yes
- Aylward: yes
Report out of committee without recommendation
2026-02-19 · pass · 7-4
Member-level votes (13)
- Czmowski: excused
- Jensen (Phil): yes
- Massie: yes
- Mortenson: yes
- Pourier: yes
- Randolph: yes
- Reimer: no
- Roe: no
- Walburg: excused
- Weems: no
- Weisgram: no
- Hughes: yes
- Aylward: yes
Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6
2026-02-20 · pass · 34-33
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: no
- Auch: yes
- Aylward: yes
- Bahmuller: yes
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: yes
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: no
- Derby: no
- Duffy: no
- Emery: no
- Fitzgerald: yes
- Fosness: no
- Garcia: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Gosch: yes
- Greenfield: no
- Halverson: no
- Healy: no
- Heermann: no
- Heinemann: excused
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: yes
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): yes
- Jordan: yes
- Jorgenson: yes
- Kassin: no
- Kayser: yes
- Kolbeck (Jack): no
- Kull: no
- Ladner: no
- Lems: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Massie: no
- May: yes
- Moore: no
- Mortenson: no
- Muckey: no
- Mulally: excused
- Mulder: no
- Nolz: yes
- Novstrup: yes
- Odenbach: yes
- Overweg: no
- Peterson (Drew): no
- Pourier: yes
- Randolph: yes
- Rehfeldt: no
- Reimer: no
- Reisch: no
- Rice: yes
- Roby: no
- Roe: no
- Schaefbauer: yes
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: yes
- Shubeck: yes
- Sjaarda: yes
- Soye: yes
- Stevens: no
- Uhre-Balk: no
- Van Diepen: no
- Walburg: no
- Weems: no
- Weisgram: no
- Wittman: no
- Hansen: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1317. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.