SD HB 1287
deadrequire an alternate approval process for an operation that extracts materials by the use of explosives.
South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did SD HB 1287 pass?
No. SD HB 1287 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-17). Latest recorded action (2026-02-17): House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 29, NAYS 37 H.J. 337
What is SD HB 1287 about?
SD HB 1287 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “require an alternate approval process for an operation that extracts materials by the use of explosives.”.
Who sponsors SD HB 1287?
Uhre-Balk, Jorgenson, Carley are the primary sponsors of SD HB 1287.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-04
- Latest action
- 2026-02-17 — House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 29, NAYS 37 H.J. 337
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Uhre-Balkprimary
- Jorgensonprimary
- Carleyprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-02-04
First read in House and referred to House Agriculture and Natural Resources H.J. 217
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-12
Scheduled for hearing H.J. 1
2026-02-12
Agriculture and Natural Resources Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 3 H.J. 22
committee-passage
2026-02-17
House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 29, NAYS 37 H.J. 337
failure
Versions
- Introduced — 2026-02-04Compare
Documents
Votes
Do Pass
2026-02-12 · pass · 7-3
Member-level votes (13)
- Goodwin: excused
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: excused
- Ladner: yes
- May: yes
- Nolz: yes
- Peterson (Drew): no
- Rice: yes
- Van Diepen: no
- Wittman: yes
- Shubeck: no
- Gosch: yes
- Overweg: excused
Do Pass
2026-02-17 · fail · 29-37
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: no
- Auch: yes
- Aylward: no
- Bahmuller: no
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: yes
- Czmowski: no
- DeGroot: no
- Derby: no
- Duffy: no
- Emery: yes
- Fitzgerald: yes
- Fosness: no
- Garcia: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Gosch: no
- Greenfield: no
- Halverson: no
- Healy: yes
- Heermann: no
- Heinemann: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: yes
- Jamison: no
- Jensen (Phil): yes
- Jordan: yes
- Jorgenson: yes
- Kassin: no
- Kayser: no
- Kolbeck (Jack): no
- Kull: no
- Ladner: yes
- Lems: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Massie: yes
- May: yes
- Moore: no
- Mortenson: no
- Muckey: yes
- Mulally: excused
- Mulder: no
- Nolz: no
- Novstrup: no
- Odenbach: yes
- Overweg: no
- Peterson (Drew): no
- Pourier: excused
- Randolph: yes
- Rehfeldt: no
- Reimer: no
- Reisch: no
- Rice: yes
- Roby: no
- Roe: no
- Schaefbauer: yes
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: no
- Shubeck: no
- Sjaarda: no
- Soye: excused
- Stevens: no
- Uhre-Balk: yes
- Van Diepen: no
- Walburg: no
- Weems: no
- Weisgram: no
- Wittman: yes
- Hansen: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1287. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.