Bill Commons

SD HB 1287

dead

require an alternate approval process for an operation that extracts materials by the use of explosives.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did SD HB 1287 pass?

No. SD HB 1287 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-17). Latest recorded action (2026-02-17): House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 29, NAYS 37 H.J. 337

What is SD HB 1287 about?

SD HB 1287 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “require an alternate approval process for an operation that extracts materials by the use of explosives.”.

Who sponsors SD HB 1287?

Uhre-Balk, Jorgenson, Carley are the primary sponsors of SD HB 1287.

Introduced
2026-02-04
Latest action
2026-02-17 — House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 29, NAYS 37 H.J. 337
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Uhre-Balkprimary
  • Jorgensonprimary
  • Carleyprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2026-02-04

    First read in House and referred to House Agriculture and Natural Resources H.J. 217

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

  2. 2026-02-12

    Scheduled for hearing H.J. 1

  3. 2026-02-12

    Agriculture and Natural Resources Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 3 H.J. 22

    committee-passage

  4. 2026-02-17

    House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 29, NAYS 37 H.J. 337

    failure

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do Pass

    2026-02-12 · pass · 7-3

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Goodwin: excused
    • Hunt: yes
    • Ismay: excused
    • Ladner: yes
    • May: yes
    • Nolz: yes
    • Peterson (Drew): no
    • Rice: yes
    • Van Diepen: no
    • Wittman: yes
    • Shubeck: no
    • Gosch: yes
    • Overweg: excused
  • Do Pass

    2026-02-17 · fail · 29-37

    Member-level votes (70)
    • Andera: yes
    • Arlint: no
    • Auch: yes
    • Aylward: no
    • Bahmuller: no
    • Bathke: excused
    • Baxter: yes
    • Czmowski: no
    • DeGroot: no
    • Derby: no
    • Duffy: no
    • Emery: yes
    • Fitzgerald: yes
    • Fosness: no
    • Garcia: yes
    • Goodwin: yes
    • Gosch: no
    • Greenfield: no
    • Halverson: no
    • Healy: yes
    • Heermann: no
    • Heinemann: yes
    • Hughes: yes
    • Hunt: yes
    • Ismay: yes
    • Jamison: no
    • Jensen (Phil): yes
    • Jordan: yes
    • Jorgenson: yes
    • Kassin: no
    • Kayser: no
    • Kolbeck (Jack): no
    • Kull: no
    • Ladner: yes
    • Lems: yes
    • Manhart: yes
    • Massie: yes
    • May: yes
    • Moore: no
    • Mortenson: no
    • Muckey: yes
    • Mulally: excused
    • Mulder: no
    • Nolz: no
    • Novstrup: no
    • Odenbach: yes
    • Overweg: no
    • Peterson (Drew): no
    • Pourier: excused
    • Randolph: yes
    • Rehfeldt: no
    • Reimer: no
    • Reisch: no
    • Rice: yes
    • Roby: no
    • Roe: no
    • Schaefbauer: yes
    • Schwans: yes
    • Shorma: no
    • Shubeck: no
    • Sjaarda: no
    • Soye: excused
    • Stevens: no
    • Uhre-Balk: yes
    • Van Diepen: no
    • Walburg: no
    • Weems: no
    • Weisgram: no
    • Wittman: yes
    • Hansen: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1287. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.