SD HB 1240
deadestablish requirements for the distribution and sale of vapor products, and to provide a penalty therefor.
South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did SD HB 1240 pass?
No. SD HB 1240 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-18). Latest recorded action (2026-02-18): Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6 , Passed, YEAS 31, NAYS 36 H.J. 355
What is SD HB 1240 about?
SD HB 1240 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “establish requirements for the distribution and sale of vapor products, and to provide a penalty therefor.”.
Who sponsors SD HB 1240?
Zikmund, Perry, Goodwin are the primary sponsors of SD HB 1240.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-02
- Latest action
- 2026-02-18 — Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6 , Passed, YEAS 31, NAYS 36 H.J. 355
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Zikmundprimary
- Perryprimary
- Goodwinprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-02-02
First read in House and referred to House Health and Human Services H.J. 192
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-17
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-17
Health and Human Services Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 6, NAYS 7
committee-failure
2026-02-17
Health and Human Services Report out of committee without recommendation , Passed, YEAS 9, NAYS 4
2026-02-18
Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6 , Passed, YEAS 31, NAYS 36 H.J. 355
Versions
- Introduced — 2026-01-29Compare
Documents
Votes
Report out of committee without recommendation
2026-02-17 · pass · 9-4
Member-level votes (13)
- Rehfeldt: yes
- Fosness: no
- Halverson: yes
- Jordan: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Emery: no
- Andera: yes
- Kayser: yes
- Schaefbauer: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Baxter: yes
- Heinemann: no
- Mulder: no
Do Pass
2026-02-17 · fail · 6-7
Member-level votes (13)
- Rehfeldt: no
- Fosness: no
- Halverson: no
- Jordan: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Emery: no
- Andera: yes
- Kayser: no
- Schaefbauer: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Baxter: yes
- Heinemann: no
- Mulder: no
Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6
2026-02-18 · fail · 31-36
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: no
- Auch: no
- Aylward: yes
- Bahmuller: no
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: yes
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: yes
- Derby: no
- Duffy: yes
- Emery: no
- Fitzgerald: no
- Fosness: no
- Garcia: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Gosch: no
- Greenfield: yes
- Halverson: yes
- Healy: no
- Heermann: no
- Heinemann: no
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: no
- Ismay: no
- Jamison: no
- Jensen (Phil): yes
- Jordan: yes
- Jorgenson: yes
- Kassin: no
- Kayser: yes
- Kolbeck (Jack): yes
- Kull: no
- Ladner: no
- Lems: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Massie: no
- May: yes
- Moore: yes
- Mortenson: no
- Muckey: no
- Mulally: yes
- Mulder: no
- Nolz: no
- Novstrup: yes
- Odenbach: no
- Overweg: no
- Peterson (Drew): no
- Pourier: yes
- Randolph: no
- Rehfeldt: yes
- Reimer: no
- Reisch: yes
- Rice: yes
- Roby: yes
- Roe: no
- Schaefbauer: excused
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: yes
- Shubeck: no
- Sjaarda: no
- Soye: excused
- Stevens: no
- Uhre-Balk: no
- Van Diepen: yes
- Walburg: yes
- Weems: no
- Weisgram: no
- Wittman: no
- Hansen: no
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1240. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.