Bill Commons

SD HB 1198

dead

require that certain facilities obtain conditional use permits from adjacent political subdivisions.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did SD HB 1198 pass?

No. SD HB 1198 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-12). Latest recorded action (2026-02-12): House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 41 H.J. 321

What is SD HB 1198 about?

SD HB 1198 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “require that certain facilities obtain conditional use permits from adjacent political subdivisions.”.

Who sponsors SD HB 1198?

Sjaarda is the primary sponsor of SD HB 1198.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-02-12 — House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 41 H.J. 321
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Sjaardaprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2026-01-29

    First Reading House H.J. 181

  2. 2026-02-02

    Referred to House Commerce and Energy H.J. 194

    referral-committee

  3. 2026-02-11

    Scheduled for hearing H.J. 1

  4. 2026-02-11

    Commerce and Energy Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 9, NAYS 4

    committee-passage

  5. 2026-02-12

    House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 41 H.J. 321

    failure

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do Pass

    2026-02-11 · pass · 9-4

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Aylward: yes
    • Duffy: no
    • Greenfield: yes
    • Kayser: yes
    • Mulally: yes
    • Nolz: yes
    • Peterson (Drew): no
    • Schwans: yes
    • Shorma: no
    • Uhre-Balk: yes
    • Weisgram: no
    • Bahmuller: yes
    • Lems: yes

  • Do Pass

    2026-02-12 · fail · 21-41

    Member-level votes (70)
    • Andera: yes
    • Arlint: no
    • Auch: yes
    • Aylward: yes
    • Bahmuller: yes
    • Bathke: excused
    • Baxter: yes
    • Czmowski: no
    • DeGroot: no
    • Derby: no
    • Duffy: no
    • Emery: no
    • Fitzgerald: yes
    • Fosness: no
    • Garcia: yes
    • Goodwin: excused
    • Gosch: excused
    • Greenfield: yes
    • Halverson: no
    • Healy: no
    • Heermann: no
    • Heinemann: no
    • Hughes: yes
    • Hunt: yes
    • Ismay: no
    • Jamison: no
    • Jensen (Phil): no
    • Jordan: no
    • Jorgenson: yes
    • Kassin: no
    • Kayser: no
    • Kolbeck (Jack): no
    • Kull: no
    • Ladner: no
    • Lems: yes
    • Manhart: no
    • Massie: yes
    • May: yes
    • Moore: excused
    • Mortenson: excused
    • Muckey: no
    • Mulally: excused
    • Mulder: no
    • Nolz: yes
    • Novstrup: yes
    • Odenbach: no
    • Overweg: no
    • Peterson (Drew): no
    • Pourier: yes
    • Randolph: no
    • Rehfeldt: excused
    • Reimer: no
    • Reisch: no
    • Rice: no
    • Roby: no
    • Roe: no
    • Schaefbauer: yes
    • Schwans: yes
    • Shorma: no
    • Shubeck: no
    • Sjaarda: yes
    • Soye: excused
    • Stevens: no
    • Uhre-Balk: no
    • Van Diepen: no
    • Walburg: no
    • Weems: no
    • Weisgram: no
    • Wittman: no
    • Hansen: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Bills/27162

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1198. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.