SD HB 1165

died on adjournment

establish basic and advanced esthetics licenses, and to revise the licensure chapter for cosmetology, nail technology, and esthetics.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did SD HB 1165 pass?

No. SD HB 1165 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-02-11): House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 27, NAYS 38 H.J. 298

What is SD HB 1165 about?

SD HB 1165 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “establish basic and advanced esthetics licenses, and to revise the licensure chapter for cosmetology, nail technology, and esthetics.”.

Who sponsors SD HB 1165?

Rice, Perry, Novstrup and 3 others are the primary sponsors of SD HB 1165.

Introduced: 2026-01-28
Latest action: 2026-02-11 — House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 27, NAYS 38 H.J. 298
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2026-01-28
First read in House and referred to House Commerce and Energy H.J. 163
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-09
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-09
Commerce and Energy Motion to amend , Passed, H.J. 15 Amendment 1165A
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-02-09
Commerce and Energy Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 11, NAYS 1 H.J. 16
2026-02-11
House of Representatives Motion to amend , Passed, H.J. 298 Amendment 1165B
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-02-11
House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 27, NAYS 38 H.J. 298

Versions

Introduced — 2026-01-27Compare
House Commerce and Energy Engrossed — 2026-02-09Compare
1165BCompare
1165ACompare

Documents

Votes

Do Pass Amended
2026-02-09 · pass · 11-1
Member-level votes (13)
- Aylward: yes
- Duffy: no
- Greenfield: yes
- Kayser: yes
- Mulally: yes
- Nolz: yes
- Peterson (Drew): yes
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: yes
- Uhre-Balk: yes
- Weisgram: excused
- Bahmuller: yes
- Lems: yes
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-11 · fail · 27-38
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: no
- Auch: yes
- Aylward: no
- Bahmuller: yes
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: yes
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: no
- Derby: yes
- Duffy: no
- Emery: no
- Fitzgerald: no
- Fosness: yes
- Garcia: no
- Goodwin: excused
- Gosch: yes
- Greenfield: yes
- Halverson: no
- Healy: no
- Heermann: no
- Heinemann: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: yes
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): no
- Jordan: no
- Jorgenson: yes
- Kassin: yes
- Kayser: no
- Kolbeck (Jack): no
- Kull: no
- Ladner: no
- Lems: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Massie: no
- May: yes
- Moore: no
- Mortenson: excused
- Muckey: no
- Mulally: excused
- Mulder: no
- Nolz: yes
- Novstrup: yes
- Odenbach: yes
- Overweg: yes
- Peterson (Drew): no
- Pourier: yes
- Randolph: no
- Rehfeldt: no
- Reimer: no
- Reisch: no
- Rice: yes
- Roby: no
- Roe: no
- Schaefbauer: no
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: no
- Shubeck: no
- Sjaarda: no
- Soye: excused
- Stevens: no
- Uhre-Balk: no
- Van Diepen: no
- Walburg: no
- Weems: no
- Weisgram: no
- Wittman: no
- Hansen: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Bills/26416

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1165. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.