SD HB 1165
died on adjournmentestablish basic and advanced esthetics licenses, and to revise the licensure chapter for cosmetology, nail technology, and esthetics.
South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did SD HB 1165 pass?
No. SD HB 1165 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-02-11): House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 27, NAYS 38 H.J. 298
What is SD HB 1165 about?
SD HB 1165 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “establish basic and advanced esthetics licenses, and to revise the licensure chapter for cosmetology, nail technology, and esthetics.”.
Who sponsors SD HB 1165?
Rice, Perry, Novstrup and 3 others are the primary sponsors of SD HB 1165.
- Introduced
- 2026-01-28
- Latest action
- 2026-02-11 — House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 27, NAYS 38 H.J. 298
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Riceprimary
- Perryprimary
- Novstrupprimary
- Goodwinprimary
- Schwansprimary
- Hulseprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-02-11
House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 27, NAYS 38 H.J. 298
2026-02-11
House of Representatives Motion to amend , Passed, H.J. 298 Amendment 1165B
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-02-09
Commerce and Energy Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 11, NAYS 1 H.J. 16
2026-02-09
Commerce and Energy Motion to amend , Passed, H.J. 15 Amendment 1165A
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-02-09
Scheduled for hearing
2026-01-28
First read in House and referred to House Commerce and Energy H.J. 163
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
Versions
Documents
Votes
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-09 · pass · 11-1
Member-level votes (13)
- Aylward: yes
- Duffy: no
- Greenfield: yes
- Kayser: yes
- Mulally: yes
- Nolz: yes
- Peterson (Drew): yes
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: yes
- Uhre-Balk: yes
- Weisgram: excused
- Bahmuller: yes
- Lems: yes
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-11 · fail · 27-38
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: no
- Auch: yes
- Aylward: no
- Bahmuller: yes
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: yes
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: no
- Derby: yes
- Duffy: no
- Emery: no
- Fitzgerald: no
- Fosness: yes
- Garcia: no
- Goodwin: excused
- Gosch: yes
- Greenfield: yes
- Halverson: no
- Healy: no
- Heermann: no
- Heinemann: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: yes
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): no
- Jordan: no
- Jorgenson: yes
- Kassin: yes
- Kayser: no
- Kolbeck (Jack): no
- Kull: no
- Ladner: no
- Lems: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Massie: no
- May: yes
- Moore: no
- Mortenson: excused
- Muckey: no
- Mulally: excused
- Mulder: no
- Nolz: yes
- Novstrup: yes
- Odenbach: yes
- Overweg: yes
- Peterson (Drew): no
- Pourier: yes
- Randolph: no
- Rehfeldt: no
- Reimer: no
- Reisch: no
- Rice: yes
- Roby: no
- Roe: no
- Schaefbauer: no
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: no
- Shubeck: no
- Sjaarda: no
- Soye: excused
- Stevens: no
- Uhre-Balk: no
- Van Diepen: no
- Walburg: no
- Weems: no
- Weisgram: no
- Wittman: no
- Hansen: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1165. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.