SD HB 1077

enacted

consider a cultivated-protein food product to be adulterated food.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did SD HB 1077 pass?

Yes. SD HB 1077 has been enacted into law as of 2026-03-30. Latest recorded action (2026-03-30): Delivered veto sustained to the Secretary of State H.J. 583

What is SD HB 1077 about?

SD HB 1077 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “consider a cultivated-protein food product to be adulterated food.”.

Who sponsors SD HB 1077?

Voita, Sjaarda, Schwans and 20 others are the primary sponsors of SD HB 1077.

Introduced: 2026-01-16
Latest action: 2026-03-30 — Delivered veto sustained to the Secretary of State H.J. 583
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2026-01-16
First read in House and referred to House Agriculture and Natural Resources H.J. 42
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-01-27
Scheduled for hearing H.J. 1
2026-01-27
Agriculture and Natural Resources Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 9, NAYS 3 H.J. 8
committee-passage
2026-01-28
House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 45, NAYS 22 H.J. 168
passage
2026-01-29
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources S.J. 143
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-03
Scheduled for hearing S.J. 1
2026-02-03
Agriculture and Natural Resources Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 3 S.J. 9
committee-passage
2026-02-05
Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 18, NAYS 16 S.J. 202
passage
2026-02-06
Signed by the Speaker H.J. 251
passage
2026-02-09
Signed by the President S.J. 223
passage
2026-02-10
Delivered to the Governor on 2026-02-10 H.J. 271
executive-receipt
2026-02-10
Vetoed by the Governor H.J. 270
executive-veto
2026-03-30
Veto override , Passed, YEAS 32, NAYS 32 H.J. 581
veto-override-failure
2026-03-30
Delivered veto sustained to the Secretary of State H.J. 583

Versions

Introduced — 2026-01-15Compare
Enrolled — 2026-02-06Compare

Documents

Votes

Do Pass
2026-01-27 · pass · 9-3
Member-level votes (13)
- Goodwin: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: yes
- Ladner: yes
- May: excused
- Nolz: yes
- Peterson (Drew): no
- Rice: yes
- Van Diepen: no
- Wittman: no
- Shubeck: yes
- Gosch: yes
- Overweg: yes
Do Pass
2026-01-28 · pass · 45-22
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: no
- Auch: yes
- Aylward: yes
- Bahmuller: yes
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: yes
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: excused
- Derby: yes
- Duffy: no
- Emery: yes
- Fitzgerald: yes
- Fosness: no
- Garcia: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Gosch: yes
- Greenfield: yes
- Halverson: no
- Healy: no
- Heermann: no
- Heinemann: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: yes
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): yes
- Jordan: yes
- Jorgenson: yes
- Kassin: no
- Kayser: yes
- Kolbeck (Jack): yes
- Kull: yes
- Ladner: yes
- Lems: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Massie: no
- May: yes
- Moore: yes
- Mortenson: no
- Muckey: no
- Mulally: yes
- Mulder: yes
- Nolz: yes
- Novstrup: yes
- Odenbach: yes
- Overweg: yes
- Peterson (Drew): no
- Pourier: yes
- Randolph: yes
- Rehfeldt: no
- Reimer: no
- Reisch: no
- Rice: yes
- Roby: no
- Roe: no
- Schaefbauer: yes
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: excused
- Shubeck: yes
- Sjaarda: yes
- Soye: yes
- Stevens: no
- Uhre-Balk: no
- Van Diepen: no
- Walburg: yes
- Weems: no
- Weisgram: no
- Wittman: no
- Hansen: yes
Do Pass
2026-02-03 · pass · 4-3
Member-level votes (7)
- Davis: no
- Duhamel: no
- Marty: yes
- Voight: yes
- Wipf: no
- Jensen (Kevin): yes
- Pischke: yes
Do Pass
2026-02-05 · pass · 18-16
Member-level votes (35)
- Beal: excused
- Blanc: yes
- Carley: yes
- Crabtree: no
- Davis: no
- Deibert: no
- Duhamel: no
- Foster: yes
- Grove: yes
- Hohn: yes
- Howard: yes
- Hulse: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): yes
- Karr: yes
- Kolbeck (Steve): no
- Lapka: yes
- Larson: no
- Marty: yes
- Mehlhaff: yes
- Miskimins: no
- Nelson: yes
- Otten: no
- Perry: yes
- Peterson (Sue): yes
- Pischke: yes
- Reed: no
- Rohl: no
- Sauder: no
- Schoenfish: no
- Smith: no
- Vilhauer: no
- Voight: yes
- Voita: yes
- Wipf: no
- Zikmund: no
Veto override
2026-03-30 · fail · 32-32
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: no
- Auch: yes
- Aylward: yes
- Bahmuller: yes
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: yes
- Czmowski: no
- DeGroot: no
- Derby: no
- Duffy: no
- Emery: no
- Fitzgerald: no
- Fosness: no
- Garcia: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Gosch: yes
- Greenfield: yes
- Halverson: no
- Healy: no
- Heermann: no
- Heinemann: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: yes
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): yes
- Jordan: yes
- Jorgenson: yes
- Kassin: no
- Kayser: yes
- Kolbeck (Jack): no
- Kull: no
- Ladner: no
- Lems: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Massie: no
- May: excused
- Moore: yes
- Mortenson: no
- Muckey: no
- Mulally: yes
- Mulder: no
- Nolz: yes
- Novstrup: no
- Odenbach: yes
- Overweg: yes
- Peterson (Drew): no
- Pourier: excused
- Randolph: yes
- Rehfeldt: no
- Reimer: excused
- Reisch: no
- Rice: yes
- Roby: no
- Roe: no
- Schaefbauer: yes
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: no
- Shubeck: yes
- Sjaarda: yes
- Soye: excused
- Stevens: no
- Uhre-Balk: no
- Van Diepen: no
- Walburg: excused
- Weems: no
- Weisgram: no
- Wittman: no
- Hansen: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Bills/26999

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1077. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.