SD HB 1065

died on adjournment

revise the medical purpose affirmative defense in cannabis prosecution.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did SD HB 1065 pass?

No. SD HB 1065 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-03-02): Health and Human Services Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 3 S.J. 23

What is SD HB 1065 about?

SD HB 1065 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “revise the medical purpose affirmative defense in cannabis prosecution.”.

Who sponsors SD HB 1065?

Schaefbauer, Rice, Perry and 7 others are the primary sponsors of SD HB 1065.

Introduced: 2026-02-17
Latest action: 2026-03-02 — Health and Human Services Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 3 S.J. 23
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

2026-03-02
Health and Human Services Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 3 S.J. 23
2026-03-02
Health and Human Services Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 23 Amendment 1065D
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-03-02
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-18
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Health and Human Services S.J. 296
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-17
House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 53, NAYS 13 H.J. 339
2026-02-17
House of Representatives Motion to amend , Passed, YEAS 35, NAYS 31 H.J. 338 Amendment 1065C
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-02-12
Health and Human Services Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 8, NAYS 3 H.J. 17
committee-passage
2026-02-12
Scheduled for hearing
2026-01-22
Referred to House Health and Human Services H.J. 113
referral-committee
2026-01-15
First Reading House H.J. 37

Versions

Introduced — 2026-01-14Compare
House Engrossed — 2026-02-17Compare
1065DCompare
1065CCompare

Documents

Votes

Do Pass
2026-02-12 · pass · 8-3
Member-level votes (13)
- Rehfeldt: excused
- Fosness: no
- Halverson: yes
- Jordan: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Emery: no
- Andera: excused
- Kayser: yes
- Schaefbauer: yes
- Manhart: yes
- Baxter: yes
- Heinemann: yes
- Mulder: no
Motion to amend
2026-02-17 · pass · 35-31
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: yes
- Auch: no
- Aylward: no
- Bahmuller: no
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: no
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: yes
- Derby: yes
- Duffy: yes
- Emery: yes
- Fitzgerald: no
- Fosness: yes
- Garcia: no
- Goodwin: yes
- Gosch: no
- Greenfield: yes
- Halverson: yes
- Healy: yes
- Heermann: yes
- Heinemann: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: no
- Ismay: no
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): no
- Jordan: no
- Jorgenson: no
- Kassin: yes
- Kayser: no
- Kolbeck (Jack): yes
- Kull: yes
- Ladner: no
- Lems: no
- Manhart: no
- Massie: yes
- May: no
- Moore: yes
- Mortenson: yes
- Muckey: no
- Mulally: excused
- Mulder: yes
- Nolz: no
- Novstrup: no
- Odenbach: no
- Overweg: no
- Peterson (Drew): yes
- Pourier: excused
- Randolph: no
- Rehfeldt: yes
- Reimer: yes
- Reisch: yes
- Rice: no
- Roby: yes
- Roe: yes
- Schaefbauer: no
- Schwans: no
- Shorma: yes
- Shubeck: no
- Sjaarda: no
- Soye: excused
- Stevens: yes
- Uhre-Balk: no
- Van Diepen: yes
- Walburg: yes
- Weems: yes
- Weisgram: yes
- Wittman: no
- Hansen: no
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-17 · pass · 53-13
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: yes
- Arlint: yes
- Auch: yes
- Aylward: no
- Bahmuller: yes
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: yes
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: no
- Derby: yes
- Duffy: yes
- Emery: no
- Fitzgerald: yes
- Fosness: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Gosch: yes
- Greenfield: yes
- Halverson: yes
- Healy: no
- Heermann: yes
- Heinemann: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Ismay: yes
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): yes
- Jordan: yes
- Jorgenson: yes
- Kassin: yes
- Kayser: yes
- Kolbeck (Jack): yes
- Kull: yes
- Ladner: yes
- Lems: yes
- Manhart: no
- Massie: yes
- May: yes
- Moore: yes
- Mortenson: yes
- Muckey: no
- Mulally: excused
- Mulder: yes
- Nolz: yes
- Novstrup: no
- Odenbach: no
- Overweg: no
- Peterson (Drew): yes
- Pourier: excused
- Randolph: no
- Rehfeldt: yes
- Reimer: yes
- Reisch: yes
- Rice: yes
- Roby: yes
- Roe: yes
- Schaefbauer: yes
- Schwans: yes
- Shorma: yes
- Shubeck: yes
- Sjaarda: yes
- Soye: excused
- Stevens: no
- Uhre-Balk: no
- Van Diepen: yes
- Walburg: yes
- Weems: yes
- Weisgram: yes
- Wittman: no
- Hansen: yes
Deferred to the 41st legislative day
2026-03-02 · pass · 4-3
Member-level votes (7)
- Grove: yes
- Perry: no
- Reed: yes
- Smith: yes
- Voight: no
- Davis: yes
- Jensen (Kevin): no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Bills/26828

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this session Session dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1065. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.