SD HB 1010

died on adjournment

modify requirements regarding the use of a mobile electronic device while operating a motor vehicle.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did SD HB 1010 pass?

No. SD HB 1010 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-02-18): House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 46 H.J. 358

What is SD HB 1010 about?

SD HB 1010 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “modify requirements regarding the use of a mobile electronic device while operating a motor vehicle.”.

Who sponsors SD HB 1010?

Zikmund, Shorma are the primary sponsors of SD HB 1010.

Introduced: 2026-01-13
Latest action: 2026-02-18 — House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 46 H.J. 358
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2026-01-13
First read in House and referred to House Transportation H.J. 15
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2026-01-15
Scheduled for hearing
2026-01-29
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-03
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-03
Transportation Deferred to another day , Passed, H.J. 11
2026-02-12
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-12
Transportation Motion to amend , Passed, Amendment 1010A
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-02-12
Transportation Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 8, NAYS 2
2026-02-18
House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 46 H.J. 358

Versions

Introduced — 2025-12-26Compare
House Transportation Engrossed — 2026-02-13Compare
1010ACompare

Documents

Votes

Do Pass Amended
2026-02-12 · pass · 8-2
Member-level votes (13)
- Arlint: yes
- Bathke: excused
- Duffy: yes
- Fosness: yes
- Goodwin: excused
- Mulder: yes
- Rehfeldt: excused
- Roe: yes
- Shorma: yes
- Shubeck: no
- Weems: yes
- Czmowski: yes
- Randolph: no
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-18 · fail · 21-46
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: no
- Arlint: yes
- Auch: no
- Aylward: no
- Bahmuller: no
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: no
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: no
- Derby: yes
- Duffy: yes
- Emery: no
- Fitzgerald: yes
- Fosness: yes
- Garcia: no
- Goodwin: no
- Gosch: no
- Greenfield: no
- Halverson: yes
- Healy: no
- Heermann: yes
- Heinemann: no
- Hughes: no
- Hunt: no
- Ismay: no
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): no
- Jordan: no
- Jorgenson: no
- Kassin: yes
- Kayser: no
- Kolbeck (Jack): no
- Kull: no
- Ladner: yes
- Lems: no
- Manhart: no
- Massie: no
- May: no
- Moore: yes
- Mortenson: no
- Muckey: no
- Mulally: no
- Mulder: no
- Nolz: no
- Novstrup: no
- Odenbach: no
- Overweg: no
- Peterson (Drew): no
- Pourier: no
- Randolph: no
- Rehfeldt: yes
- Reimer: no
- Reisch: yes
- Rice: no
- Roby: yes
- Roe: yes
- Schaefbauer: excused
- Schwans: no
- Shorma: yes
- Shubeck: no
- Sjaarda: no
- Soye: excused
- Stevens: yes
- Uhre-Balk: no
- Van Diepen: yes
- Walburg: no
- Weems: yes
- Weisgram: yes
- Wittman: no
- Hansen: no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Bills/26815

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1010. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.