SD HB 1010
died on adjournmentmodify requirements regarding the use of a mobile electronic device while operating a motor vehicle.
South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did SD HB 1010 pass?
No. SD HB 1010 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-02-18): House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 46 H.J. 358
What is SD HB 1010 about?
SD HB 1010 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “modify requirements regarding the use of a mobile electronic device while operating a motor vehicle.”.
Who sponsors SD HB 1010?
Zikmund, Shorma are the primary sponsors of SD HB 1010.
- Introduced
- 2026-01-13
- Latest action
- 2026-02-18 — House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 46 H.J. 358
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Zikmundprimary
- Shormaprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-02-18
House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 46 H.J. 358
2026-02-12
Transportation Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 8, NAYS 2
2026-02-12
Transportation Motion to amend , Passed, Amendment 1010A
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2026-02-12
Scheduled for hearing
2026-02-03
Transportation Deferred to another day , Passed, H.J. 11
2026-02-03
Scheduled for hearing
2026-01-29
Scheduled for hearing
2026-01-15
Scheduled for hearing
2026-01-13
First read in House and referred to House Transportation H.J. 15
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
Versions
Documents
Votes
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-12 · pass · 8-2
Member-level votes (13)
- Arlint: yes
- Bathke: excused
- Duffy: yes
- Fosness: yes
- Goodwin: excused
- Mulder: yes
- Rehfeldt: excused
- Roe: yes
- Shorma: yes
- Shubeck: no
- Weems: yes
- Czmowski: yes
- Randolph: no
Do Pass Amended
2026-02-18 · fail · 21-46
Member-level votes (70)
- Andera: no
- Arlint: yes
- Auch: no
- Aylward: no
- Bahmuller: no
- Bathke: excused
- Baxter: no
- Czmowski: yes
- DeGroot: no
- Derby: yes
- Duffy: yes
- Emery: no
- Fitzgerald: yes
- Fosness: yes
- Garcia: no
- Goodwin: no
- Gosch: no
- Greenfield: no
- Halverson: yes
- Healy: no
- Heermann: yes
- Heinemann: no
- Hughes: no
- Hunt: no
- Ismay: no
- Jamison: yes
- Jensen (Phil): no
- Jordan: no
- Jorgenson: no
- Kassin: yes
- Kayser: no
- Kolbeck (Jack): no
- Kull: no
- Ladner: yes
- Lems: no
- Manhart: no
- Massie: no
- May: no
- Moore: yes
- Mortenson: no
- Muckey: no
- Mulally: no
- Mulder: no
- Nolz: no
- Novstrup: no
- Odenbach: no
- Overweg: no
- Peterson (Drew): no
- Pourier: no
- Randolph: no
- Rehfeldt: yes
- Reimer: no
- Reisch: yes
- Rice: no
- Roby: yes
- Roe: yes
- Schaefbauer: excused
- Schwans: no
- Shorma: yes
- Shubeck: no
- Sjaarda: no
- Soye: excused
- Stevens: yes
- Uhre-Balk: no
- Van Diepen: yes
- Walburg: no
- Weems: yes
- Weisgram: yes
- Wittman: no
- Hansen: no
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1010. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.