Bill Commons

SD HB 1009

dead

revise the speed limit restriction applicable to the operation of a golf cart on certain highways.

South Dakota · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did SD HB 1009 pass?

No. SD HB 1009 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-01-20). Latest recorded action (2026-01-20): House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 48 H.J. 54

What is SD HB 1009 about?

SD HB 1009 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “revise the speed limit restriction applicable to the operation of a golf cart on certain highways.”.

Who sponsors SD HB 1009?

Rice, Jordan, Jensen (Kevin) and 4 others are the primary sponsors of SD HB 1009.

Introduced
2026-01-13
Latest action
2026-01-20 — House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 48 H.J. 54
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Riceprimary
  • Jordanprimary
  • Jensen (Kevin)primary
  • DeGrootprimary
  • Baxterprimary
  • Aylwardprimary
  • Shormaprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2026-01-13

    First read in House and referred to House Transportation H.J. 15

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

  2. 2026-01-15

    Scheduled for hearing

  3. 2026-01-15

    Transportation Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0 H.J. 1

    committee-passage

  4. 2026-01-15

    Certified uncontested, placed on consent , Passed, H.J. 1

  5. 2026-01-16

    Remove from Consent Calendar H.J. 43

  6. 2026-01-20

    House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 21, NAYS 48 H.J. 54

    failure

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do Pass

    2026-01-15 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Jensen (Phil): yes
    • Arlint: yes
    • Duffy: yes
    • Fosness: yes
    • Goodwin: excused
    • Mulder: yes
    • Rehfeldt: yes
    • Roe: yes
    • Shorma: yes
    • Shubeck: yes
    • Weems: yes
    • Czmowski: yes
    • Randolph: yes
  • Do Pass

    2026-01-20 · fail · 21-48

    Member-level votes (70)
    • Andera: no
    • Arlint: no
    • Auch: no
    • Aylward: yes
    • Bahmuller: no
    • Bathke: excused
    • Baxter: no
    • Czmowski: no
    • DeGroot: no
    • Derby: yes
    • Duffy: no
    • Emery: yes
    • Fitzgerald: no
    • Fosness: yes
    • Garcia: no
    • Goodwin: no
    • Gosch: yes
    • Greenfield: no
    • Halverson: no
    • Healy: yes
    • Heermann: no
    • Heinemann: no
    • Hughes: no
    • Hunt: yes
    • Ismay: no
    • Jamison: yes
    • Jensen (Phil): yes
    • Jordan: yes
    • Jorgenson: no
    • Kassin: yes
    • Kayser: no
    • Kolbeck (Jack): no
    • Kull: no
    • Ladner: yes
    • Lems: no
    • Manhart: yes
    • Massie: no
    • May: no
    • Moore: no
    • Mortenson: no
    • Muckey: no
    • Mulally: no
    • Mulder: yes
    • Nolz: no
    • Novstrup: no
    • Odenbach: no
    • Overweg: no
    • Peterson (Drew): no
    • Pourier: no
    • Randolph: yes
    • Rehfeldt: yes
    • Reimer: no
    • Reisch: no
    • Rice: no
    • Roby: no
    • Roe: yes
    • Schaefbauer: no
    • Schwans: no
    • Shorma: yes
    • Shubeck: no
    • Sjaarda: no
    • Soye: no
    • Stevens: no
    • Uhre-Balk: yes
    • Van Diepen: no
    • Walburg: no
    • Weems: yes
    • Weisgram: no
    • Wittman: yes
    • Hansen: no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:38.286047Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SD&identifier=HB 1009. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.