OK HB 2729
enactedAdministrative Procedures Act; judicial review; providing for timing of certain claim; requiring interpretation of statute, rule, or regulation be provided; establishing guidelines; effective date.
Oklahoma · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did OK HB 2729 pass?
Yes. OK HB 2729 has been enacted into law as of 2025-05-21. Latest recorded action (2025-05-21): Approved by Governor 05/21/2025
What is OK HB 2729 about?
OK HB 2729 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Administrative Procedures Act; judicial review; providing for timing of certain claim; requiring interpretation of statute, rule, or regulation be provided; establishing guidelines; effective date.”.
Who sponsors OK HB 2729?
Kendrix, Bergstrom are the primary sponsors of OK HB 2729.
- Introduced
- 2025-02-03
- Latest action
- 2025-05-21 — Approved by Governor 05/21/2025
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Kendrixprimary
- Bergstromprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-02-03
First Reading
introduction,reading-1
2025-02-03
Authored by Representative Kendrix
2025-02-04
Second Reading referred to Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight
reading-2,referral-committee
2025-02-04
Referred to Civil Judiciary
referral-committee
2025-02-06
Policy recommendation to the Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight committee; Do Pass Civil Judiciary
committee-passage
2025-02-06
Coauthored by Representative(s) Maynard
2025-02-06
Authored by Senator Bergstrom (principal Senate author)
2025-02-25
CR; Do Pass Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight Committee
committee-passage
2025-02-25
Coauthored by Representative(s) Jenkins, Lepak
2025-03-03
General Order
2025-03-03
Coauthored by Representative(s) CrosswhiteHader, Stark, Hill
2025-03-03
Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 79 Nays: 16
passage,reading-3
2025-03-03
Referred for engrossment
2025-03-04
Engrossed, signed, to Senate
passage
2025-03-04
First Reading
introduction,reading-1
2025-04-01
Second Reading referred to Judiciary
reading-2,referral-committee
2025-04-22
Reported Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Judiciary committee; CR filed
committee-passage
2025-04-24
Placed on General Order
2025-05-05
Coauthored by Senator Jett
2025-05-05
General Order, Considered
2025-05-05
Measure passed: Ayes: 37 Nays: 8
passage
2025-05-05
Referred for engrossment
2025-05-06
Engrossed to House
passage
2025-05-06
SA's received
2025-05-14
SA's read, adopted
passage
2025-05-14
Fourth Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 71 Nays: 16
passage
2025-05-14
Referred for enrollment
2025-05-15
Enrolled, signed, to Senate
2025-05-15
Enrolled measure signed, returned to House
2025-05-15
Sent to Governor
executive-receipt
2025-05-21
Approved by Governor 05/21/2025
executive-signature
Versions
Documents
Votes
Civil Judiciary Committee: Do Pass
2025-02-06 · pass · 6-2
Member-level votes (8)
- Culver: yes
- Kannady: yes
- Osburn: yes
- Sneed: yes
- Stinson: yes
- West (T): yes
- Deck: no
- Schreiber: no
Judiciary And Public Safety Oversight Committee: Do Pass
2025-02-25 · pass · 6-2
Member-level votes (8)
- Duel: yes
- Ford: yes
- Hardin: yes
- Kane: yes
- Kannady: yes
- Manger: yes
- Rosecrants: no
- Schreiber: no
Third Reading
2025-03-03 · pass · 79-16
Member-level votes (101)
- Hays: yes
- Gann: yes
- Lowe (D): yes
- Staires: yes
- Adams: yes
- George: yes
- Luttrell: yes
- Stark: yes
- Archer: yes
- Gise: yes
- Manger: yes
- Steagall: yes
- Banning: yes
- Grego: yes
- Marti: yes
- Sterling: yes
- Bashore: yes
- Hall: yes
- May: yes
- Stinson: yes
- Blair: yes
- Hardin: yes
- Maynard: yes
- Strom: yes
- Boles: yes
- Harris: yes
- Menz: yes
- Tedford: yes
- Burns: yes
- Hasenbeck: yes
- Miller: yes
- Townley: yes
- Caldwell (C): yes
- Hildebrant: yes
- Moore: yes
- Turner: yes
- Caldwell (T): yes
- Hill: yes
- Newton: yes
- West (J): yes
- Cantrell: yes
- Humphrey: yes
- Olsen: yes
- West (K): yes
- Chapman: yes
- Jenkins: yes
- Osburn: yes
- West (R): yes
- Cornwell: yes
- Johns: yes
- Pae: yes
- West (T): yes
- Crosswhite Hader: yes
- Kane: yes
- Patzkowsky: yes
- Wilk: yes
- Culver: yes
- Kannady: yes
- Pfeiffer: yes
- Williams: yes
- Dempsey: yes
- Kendrix: yes
- Pittman: yes
- Wolfley: yes
- Dobrinski: yes
- Kerbs: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Woolley: yes
- Duel: yes
- Lawson: yes
- Roe: yes
- Worthen: yes
- Eaves: yes
- Lay: yes
- Shaw: yes
- Mr. Speaker: yes
- Ford: yes
- Lepak: yes
- Sneed: yes
- Alonso-Sandoval: no
- Dollens: no
- Munson: no
- Rosecrants: no
- Bennett: no
- Fugate: no
- Pogemiller: no
- Schreiber: no
- Blancett: no
- Hefner: no
- Provenzano: no
- Stewart: no
- Deck: no
- McCane: no
- Ranson: no
- Waldron: no
- Fetgatter: excused
- Kelley: excused
- Lowe (J): excused
- Smith: excused
- VACANCY:: other
- 2: other
Judiciary
2025-04-22 · pass · 8-1
Member-level votes (10)
- Boren: yes
- Daniels: yes
- Gollihare: yes
- Howard: yes
- Jech: yes
- Jett: yes
- Rosino: yes
- Standridge: yes
- Brooks: no
- AMD HB2729 PCS - ADOPTED (Request No: 1995): other
Third Reading
2025-05-05 · pass · 37-8
Member-level votes (47)
- Alvord: yes
- Green: yes
- Jett: yes
- Rosino: yes
- Bergstrom: yes
- Grellner: yes
- Kern: yes
- Sacchieri: yes
- Bullard: yes
- Guthrie: yes
- McIntosh: yes
- Seifried: yes
- Burns: yes
- Hall: yes
- Paxton: yes
- Standridge: yes
- Coleman: yes
- Hamilton: yes
- Pederson: yes
- Stanley: yes
- Daniels: yes
- Haste: yes
- Prieto: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Deevers: yes
- Hines: yes
- Pugh: yes
- Thompson: yes
- Frix: yes
- Howard: yes
- Rader: yes
- Weaver: yes
- Gillespie: yes
- Jech: yes
- Reinhardt: yes
- Woods: yes
- Gollihare: yes
- Boren: no
- Dossett: no
- Hicks: no
- Mann: no
- Brooks: no
- Goodwin: no
- Kirt: no
- Nice: no
- Murdock: excused
- Wingard: excused
Fourth Reading
2025-05-14 · pass · 71-16
Member-level votes (100)
- Adams: yes
- Gise: yes
- Lepak: yes
- Staires: yes
- Archer: yes
- Grego: yes
- Lowe (D): yes
- Stark: yes
- Banning: yes
- Hall: yes
- Luttrell: yes
- Steagall: yes
- Bashore: yes
- Hardin: yes
- Manger: yes
- Sterling: yes
- Blair: yes
- Harris: yes
- May: yes
- Strom: yes
- Boles: yes
- Hasenbeck: yes
- Maynard: yes
- Townley: yes
- Burns: yes
- Hays: yes
- Moore: yes
- Turner: yes
- Caldwell (C): yes
- Hildebrant: yes
- Newton: yes
- West (J): yes
- Caldwell (T): yes
- Humphrey: yes
- Olsen: yes
- West (K): yes
- Cantrell: yes
- Jenkins: yes
- Osburn: yes
- West (R): yes
- Chapman: yes
- Johns: yes
- Pae: yes
- West (T): yes
- Cornwell: yes
- Kane: yes
- Patzkowsky: yes
- Wilk: yes
- Crosswhite Hader: yes
- Kannady: yes
- Pfeiffer: yes
- Williams: yes
- Culver: yes
- Kelley: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Wolfley: yes
- Dempsey: yes
- Kendrix: yes
- Roe: yes
- Woolley: yes
- Duel: yes
- Kerbs: yes
- Shaw: yes
- Worthen: yes
- Gann: yes
- Lawson: yes
- Smith: yes
- Mr. Speaker: yes
- George: yes
- Lay: yes
- Sneed: yes
- Alonso-Sandoval: no
- Fugate: no
- Pittman: no
- Rosecrants: no
- Bennett: no
- Hefner: no
- Pogemiller: no
- Schreiber: no
- Blancett: no
- McCane: no
- Provenzano: no
- Stewart: no
- Deck: no
- Menz: no
- Ranson: no
- Waldron: no
- Dobrinski: excused
- Fetgatter: excused
- Marti: excused
- Stinson: excused
- Dollens: excused
- Ford: excused
- Miller: excused
- Tedford: excused
- Eaves: excused
- Hill: excused
- Munson: excused
- VACANCY:: other
- 3: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:30:20.811026Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=OK&identifier=HB 2729. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.