OK HB 2729
enactedAdministrative Procedures Act; judicial review; providing for timing of certain claim; requiring interpretation of statute, rule, or regulation be provided; establishing guidelines; effective date.
Oklahoma · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did OK HB 2729 pass?
Yes. OK HB 2729 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-05-21): Approved by Governor 05/21/2025
What is OK HB 2729 about?
OK HB 2729 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Administrative Procedures Act; judicial review; providing for timing of certain claim; requiring interpretation of statute, rule, or regulation be provided; establishing guidelines; effective date.”.
Who sponsors OK HB 2729?
Kendrix, Bergstrom are the primary sponsors of OK HB 2729.
- Introduced
- 2025-02-03
- Latest action
- 2025-05-21 — Approved by Governor 05/21/2025
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Kendrixprimary
- Bergstromprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2025-05-21
Approved by Governor 05/21/2025
executive-signature
2025-05-15
Sent to Governor
executive-receipt
2025-05-15
Enrolled measure signed, returned to House
2025-05-15
Enrolled, signed, to Senate
2025-05-14
Referred for enrollment
2025-05-14
Fourth Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 71 Nays: 16
passage
2025-05-14
SA's read, adopted
passage
2025-05-06
SA's received
2025-05-06
Engrossed to House
passage
2025-05-05
Referred for engrossment
2025-05-05
Measure passed: Ayes: 37 Nays: 8
passage
2025-05-05
General Order, Considered
2025-05-05
Coauthored by Senator Jett
2025-04-24
Placed on General Order
2025-04-22
Reported Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Judiciary committee; CR filed
committee-passage
2025-04-01
Second Reading referred to Judiciary
reading-2,referral-committee
2025-03-04
First Reading
introduction,reading-1
2025-03-04
Engrossed, signed, to Senate
passage
2025-03-03
Referred for engrossment
2025-03-03
Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 79 Nays: 16
passage,reading-3
2025-03-03
Coauthored by Representative(s) CrosswhiteHader, Stark, Hill
2025-03-03
General Order
2025-02-25
Coauthored by Representative(s) Jenkins, Lepak
2025-02-25
CR; Do Pass Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight Committee
committee-passage
2025-02-06
Authored by Senator Bergstrom (principal Senate author)
2025-02-06
Coauthored by Representative(s) Maynard
2025-02-06
Policy recommendation to the Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight committee; Do Pass Civil Judiciary
committee-passage
2025-02-04
Referred to Civil Judiciary
referral-committee
2025-02-04
Second Reading referred to Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight
reading-2,referral-committee
2025-02-03
Authored by Representative Kendrix
2025-02-03
First Reading
introduction,reading-1
Versions
Documents
Votes
Civil Judiciary Committee: Do Pass
2025-02-06 · pass · 6-2
Member-level votes (8)
- Culver: yes
- Kannady: yes
- Osburn: yes
- Sneed: yes
- Stinson: yes
- West (T): yes
- Deck: no
- Schreiber: no
Judiciary And Public Safety Oversight Committee: Do Pass
2025-02-25 · pass · 6-2
Member-level votes (8)
- Duel: yes
- Ford: yes
- Hardin: yes
- Kane: yes
- Kannady: yes
- Manger: yes
- Rosecrants: no
- Schreiber: no
Third Reading
2025-03-03 · pass · 79-16
Member-level votes (101)
- Hays: yes
- Gann: yes
- Lowe (D): yes
- Staires: yes
- Adams: yes
- George: yes
- Luttrell: yes
- Stark: yes
- Archer: yes
- Gise: yes
- Manger: yes
- Steagall: yes
- Banning: yes
- Grego: yes
- Marti: yes
- Sterling: yes
- Bashore: yes
- Hall: yes
- May: yes
- Stinson: yes
- Blair: yes
- Hardin: yes
- Maynard: yes
- Strom: yes
- Boles: yes
- Harris: yes
- Menz: yes
- Tedford: yes
- Burns: yes
- Hasenbeck: yes
- Miller: yes
- Townley: yes
- Caldwell (C): yes
- Hildebrant: yes
- Moore: yes
- Turner: yes
- Caldwell (T): yes
- Hill: yes
- Newton: yes
- West (J): yes
- Cantrell: yes
- Humphrey: yes
- Olsen: yes
- West (K): yes
- Chapman: yes
- Jenkins: yes
- Osburn: yes
- West (R): yes
- Cornwell: yes
- Johns: yes
- Pae: yes
- West (T): yes
- Crosswhite Hader: yes
- Kane: yes
- Patzkowsky: yes
- Wilk: yes
- Culver: yes
- Kannady: yes
- Pfeiffer: yes
- Williams: yes
- Dempsey: yes
- Kendrix: yes
- Pittman: yes
- Wolfley: yes
- Dobrinski: yes
- Kerbs: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Woolley: yes
- Duel: yes
- Lawson: yes
- Roe: yes
- Worthen: yes
- Eaves: yes
- Lay: yes
- Shaw: yes
- Mr. Speaker: yes
- Ford: yes
- Lepak: yes
- Sneed: yes
- Alonso-Sandoval: no
- Dollens: no
- Munson: no
- Rosecrants: no
- Bennett: no
- Fugate: no
- Pogemiller: no
- Schreiber: no
- Blancett: no
- Hefner: no
- Provenzano: no
- Stewart: no
- Deck: no
- McCane: no
- Ranson: no
- Waldron: no
- Fetgatter: excused
- Kelley: excused
- Lowe (J): excused
- Smith: excused
- VACANCY:: other
- 2: other
Judiciary
2025-04-22 · pass · 8-1
Member-level votes (10)
- Boren: yes
- Daniels: yes
- Gollihare: yes
- Howard: yes
- Jech: yes
- Jett: yes
- Rosino: yes
- Standridge: yes
- Brooks: no
- AMD HB2729 PCS - ADOPTED (Request No: 1995): other
Third Reading
2025-05-05 · pass · 37-8
Member-level votes (47)
- Alvord: yes
- Green: yes
- Jett: yes
- Rosino: yes
- Bergstrom: yes
- Grellner: yes
- Kern: yes
- Sacchieri: yes
- Bullard: yes
- Guthrie: yes
- McIntosh: yes
- Seifried: yes
- Burns: yes
- Hall: yes
- Paxton: yes
- Standridge: yes
- Coleman: yes
- Hamilton: yes
- Pederson: yes
- Stanley: yes
- Daniels: yes
- Haste: yes
- Prieto: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Deevers: yes
- Hines: yes
- Pugh: yes
- Thompson: yes
- Frix: yes
- Howard: yes
- Rader: yes
- Weaver: yes
- Gillespie: yes
- Jech: yes
- Reinhardt: yes
- Woods: yes
- Gollihare: yes
- Boren: no
- Dossett: no
- Hicks: no
- Mann: no
- Brooks: no
- Goodwin: no
- Kirt: no
- Nice: no
- Murdock: excused
- Wingard: excused
Fourth Reading
2025-05-14 · pass · 71-16
Member-level votes (100)
- Adams: yes
- Gise: yes
- Lepak: yes
- Staires: yes
- Archer: yes
- Grego: yes
- Lowe (D): yes
- Stark: yes
- Banning: yes
- Hall: yes
- Luttrell: yes
- Steagall: yes
- Bashore: yes
- Hardin: yes
- Manger: yes
- Sterling: yes
- Blair: yes
- Harris: yes
- May: yes
- Strom: yes
- Boles: yes
- Hasenbeck: yes
- Maynard: yes
- Townley: yes
- Burns: yes
- Hays: yes
- Moore: yes
- Turner: yes
- Caldwell (C): yes
- Hildebrant: yes
- Newton: yes
- West (J): yes
- Caldwell (T): yes
- Humphrey: yes
- Olsen: yes
- West (K): yes
- Cantrell: yes
- Jenkins: yes
- Osburn: yes
- West (R): yes
- Chapman: yes
- Johns: yes
- Pae: yes
- West (T): yes
- Cornwell: yes
- Kane: yes
- Patzkowsky: yes
- Wilk: yes
- Crosswhite Hader: yes
- Kannady: yes
- Pfeiffer: yes
- Williams: yes
- Culver: yes
- Kelley: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Wolfley: yes
- Dempsey: yes
- Kendrix: yes
- Roe: yes
- Woolley: yes
- Duel: yes
- Kerbs: yes
- Shaw: yes
- Worthen: yes
- Gann: yes
- Lawson: yes
- Smith: yes
- Mr. Speaker: yes
- George: yes
- Lay: yes
- Sneed: yes
- Alonso-Sandoval: no
- Fugate: no
- Pittman: no
- Rosecrants: no
- Bennett: no
- Hefner: no
- Pogemiller: no
- Schreiber: no
- Blancett: no
- McCane: no
- Provenzano: no
- Stewart: no
- Deck: no
- Menz: no
- Ranson: no
- Waldron: no
- Dobrinski: excused
- Fetgatter: excused
- Marti: excused
- Stinson: excused
- Dollens: excused
- Ford: excused
- Miller: excused
- Tedford: excused
- Eaves: excused
- Hill: excused
- Munson: excused
- VACANCY:: other
- 3: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:30:20.811026Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=OK&identifier=HB 2729. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.