OK HB 1029
vetoedSunset; Oklahoma Funeral Board; extending sunset year.
Oklahoma · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did OK HB 1029 pass?
No. OK HB 1029 passed the legislature but was vetoed. Latest recorded action (2025-05-14): Vetoed 05/14/2025
What is OK HB 1029 about?
OK HB 1029 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Sunset; Oklahoma Funeral Board; extending sunset year.”.
Who sponsors OK HB 1029?
Kendrix, Bergstrom are the primary sponsors of OK HB 1029.
- Introduced
- 2025-02-03
- Latest action
- 2025-05-14 — Vetoed 05/14/2025
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Kendrixprimary
- Bergstromprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2025-05-14
Vetoed 05/14/2025
executive-veto
2025-05-08
Sent to Governor
executive-receipt
2025-05-08
Enrolled measure signed, returned to House
2025-05-08
Enrolled, signed, to Senate
2025-05-07
Referred for enrollment
2025-05-07
Engrossed measure signed, returned to House
passage
2025-05-07
Measure passed: Ayes: 33 Nays: 4
passage
2025-05-07
General Order, Considered
2025-04-08
Placed on General Order
2025-04-03
Reported Do Pass Administrative Rules committee; CR filed
committee-passage
2025-04-01
Second Reading referred to Administrative Rules
reading-2,referral-committee
2025-02-25
First Reading
introduction,reading-1
2025-02-25
Engrossed, signed, to Senate
passage
2025-02-24
Referred for engrossment
2025-02-24
Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 96 Nays: 0
passage,reading-3
2025-02-24
General Order
2025-02-17
Authored by Senator Bergstrom (principal Senate author)
2025-02-17
CR; Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Administrative Rules Committee
committee-passage
2025-02-04
Second Reading referred to Administrative Rules
reading-2,referral-committee
2025-02-03
Authored by Representative Kendrix
2025-02-03
First Reading
introduction,reading-1
Versions
Documents
Votes
Administrative Rules Committee: Do Pass As Amended By Cs
2025-02-11 · pass · 10-0
Member-level votes (10)
- Chapman: yes
- Duel: yes
- Eaves: yes
- Jenkins: yes
- Kendrix: yes
- Maynard: yes
- McCane: yes
- Staires: yes
- Waldron: yes
- West (K): yes
Third Reading
2025-02-24 · pass · 96-0
Member-level votes (101)
- Hays: yes
- Fetgatter: yes
- Lepak: yes
- Rosecrants: yes
- Adams: yes
- Ford: yes
- Lowe (D): yes
- Schreiber: yes
- Alonso-Sandoval: yes
- Fugate: yes
- Lowe (J): yes
- Shaw: yes
- Archer: yes
- Gann: yes
- Luttrell: yes
- Smith: yes
- Banning: yes
- George: yes
- Manger: yes
- Sneed: yes
- Bashore: yes
- Gise: yes
- Marti: yes
- Staires: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Grego: yes
- May: yes
- Stark: yes
- Blair: yes
- Hall: yes
- Maynard: yes
- Steagall: yes
- Blancett: yes
- Hardin: yes
- McCane: yes
- Sterling: yes
- Boles: yes
- Harris: yes
- Menz: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Burns: yes
- Hasenbeck: yes
- Miller: yes
- Stinson: yes
- Caldwell (C): yes
- Hefner: yes
- Moore: yes
- Strom: yes
- Caldwell (T): yes
- Hildebrant: yes
- Munson: yes
- Tedford: yes
- Cantrell: yes
- Hill: yes
- Olsen: yes
- Townley: yes
- Chapman: yes
- Humphrey: yes
- Osburn: yes
- Turner: yes
- Cornwell: yes
- Jenkins: yes
- Pae: yes
- Waldron: yes
- Crosswhite Hader: yes
- Johns: yes
- Patzkowsky: yes
- West (J): yes
- Culver: yes
- Kane: yes
- Pfeiffer: yes
- West (K): yes
- Deck: yes
- Kannady: yes
- Pittman: yes
- West (R): yes
- Dempsey: yes
- Kelley: yes
- Pogemiller: yes
- West (T): yes
- Dobrinski: yes
- Kendrix: yes
- Provenzano: yes
- Wilk: yes
- Dollens: yes
- Kerbs: yes
- Ranson: yes
- Williams: yes
- Duel: yes
- Lawson: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Woolley: yes
- Eaves: yes
- Lay: yes
- Roe: yes
- Mr. Speaker: yes
- Newton: excused
- Wolfley: excused
- Worthen: excused
- VACANCY:: other
- 2: other
Administrative Rules
2025-04-03 · pass · 6-0
Member-level votes (6)
- Bergstrom: yes
- Burns: yes
- Deevers: yes
- Nice: yes
- Prieto: yes
- Sacchieri: yes
Third Reading
2025-05-07 · pass · 33-4
Member-level votes (47)
- Alvord: yes
- Green: yes
- Kern: yes
- Pugh: yes
- Bergstrom: yes
- Grellner: yes
- Kirt: yes
- Rader: yes
- Boren: yes
- Guthrie: yes
- Mann: yes
- Reinhardt: yes
- Brooks: yes
- Hall: yes
- McIntosh: yes
- Sacchieri: yes
- Coleman: yes
- Haste: yes
- Murdock: yes
- Standridge: yes
- Daniels: yes
- Hicks: yes
- Nice: yes
- Stanley: yes
- Dossett: yes
- Hines: yes
- Pederson: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Frix: yes
- Jech: yes
- Prieto: yes
- Weaver: yes
- Gillespie: yes
- Bullard: no
- Burns: no
- Deevers: no
- Hamilton: no
- Gollihare: excused
- Jett: excused
- Seifried: excused
- Wingard: excused
- Goodwin: excused
- Paxton: excused
- Thompson: excused
- Woods: excused
- Howard: excused
- Rosino: excused
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:30:20.811026Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=OK&identifier=HB 1029. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.