MO SJR 65
died on adjournmentSJR 65 - Under current law, an initiative petition proposing a constitutional amendment must contain a single subject and matters properly connected therewith. This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, would additionally stipulate that an initiative petition proposing a constitutional amendment contains a single subject only if it does not extend beyond one sole purpose and only contains additions or changes that are necessary to effectuate a single legislative change. This provision is identical to SJR 56 (2024) and SJR 12 (2023). The amendment additionally provides that each initiative petition that has been approved to be circulated for signature gathering shall have a summary statement of the measure prepared. The summary statement shall not exceed 100 words and shall be a complete, concise, clear, and accurate statement of the measure. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds that a summary statement is not a complete, concise, clear, and accurate statement of the measure and that a complete, concise, clear, and accurate statement cannot possibly be written in one hundred or less words, the court shall prohibit the measure from being circulated for further signatures or, in the event that the measure has been certified to be placed on the ballot, the court shall order the measure to be removed from the ballot. SCOTT SVAGERA
Missouri · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did MO SJR 65 pass?
No. MO SJR 65 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-01-27): Second Read and Referred S Local Government, Elections and Pensions Committee
What is MO SJR 65 about?
MO SJR 65 is a joint resolution in the 2026 Regular Session titled “SJR 65 - Under current law, an initiative petition proposing a constitutional amendment must contain a single subject and matters properly connected therewith. This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, would additionally stipulate that an initiative petition proposing a constitutional amendment contains a single subject only if it does not extend beyond one sole purpose and only contains additions or changes that are necessary to effectuate a single legislative change. This provision is identical to SJR 56 (2024) and SJR 12 (2023). The amendment additionally provides that each initiative petition that has been approved to be circulated for signature gathering shall have a summary statement of the measure prepared. The summary statement shall not exceed 100 words and shall be a complete, concise, clear, and accurate statement of the measure. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds that a summary statement is not a complete, concise, clear, and accurate statement of the measure and that a complete, concise, clear, and accurate statement cannot possibly be written in one hundred or less words, the court shall prohibit the measure from being circulated for further signatures or, in the event that the measure has been certified to be placed on the ballot, the court shall order the measure to be removed from the ballot. SCOTT SVAGERA”.
Who sponsors MO SJR 65?
Cierpiot, Mike is the primary sponsor of MO SJR 65.
Description
SJR 65 - Under current law, an initiative petition proposing a constitutional amendment must contain a single subject and matters properly connected therewith. This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, would additionally stipulate that an initiative petition proposing a constitutional amendment contains a single subject only if it does not extend beyond one sole purpose and only contains additions or changes that are necessary to effectuate a single legislative change. This provision is identical to SJR 56 (2024) and SJR 12 (2023). The amendment additionally provides that each initiative petition that has been approved to be circulated for signature gathering shall have a summary statement of the measure prepared. The summary statement shall not exceed 100 words and shall be a complete, concise, clear, and accurate statement of the measure. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds that a summary statement is not a complete, concise, clear, and accurate statement of the measure and that a complete, concise, clear, and accurate statement cannot possibly be written in one hundred or less words, the court shall prohibit the measure from being circulated for further signatures or, in the event that the measure has been certified to be placed on the ballot, the court shall order the measure to be removed from the ballot. SCOTT SVAGERA
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-01-27 — Second Read and Referred S Local Government, Elections and Pensions Committee
- Bill type
- joint resolution
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Cierpiot, Mikeprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-01-27
Second Read and Referred S Local Government, Elections and Pensions Committee
reading-2,referral-committee
2026-01-07
S First Read
reading-1
2025-12-01
Prefiled
Versions
- 3842S.01I - IntroducedCompare
Documents
Votes
Not provided by source.
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:25:15.077812Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MO&identifier=SJR 65. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.