ME LD 428
deadAn Act Regarding The State Forensic Service
Maine · 132 · lower
Quick answers
Did ME LD 428 pass?
No. ME LD 428 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2025-06-12). Latest recorded action (2025-06-12): Placed in Legislative Files (DEAD)
What is ME LD 428 about?
ME LD 428 is a bill in the 132 titled “An Act Regarding The State Forensic Service”.
Who sponsors ME LD 428?
Sophia WARREN is the primary sponsor of ME LD 428.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2025-06-12 — Placed in Legislative Files (DEAD)
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Sophia WARRENprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-02-04
Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety suggested and ordered printed.
2025-02-04
The Bill was REFERRED to the Committee on CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY.
referral-committee
2025-02-04
Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-02-04
The Bill was REFERRED to the Committee on CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY in concurrence
referral-committee
2025-03-21
Carried over, in the same posture, to the next special or regular session of the 132nd Legislature, pursuant to Joint Order SP 519.
2025-06-11
Reports READ.
2025-06-11
On motion of Representative HASENFUS of Readfield, the Majority Ought to Pass as Amended Report was ACCEPTED.
2025-06-11
The Bill was READ ONCE.
reading-1
2025-06-11
Committee Amendment "A" (H-635) was READ and ADOPTED.
committee-passage-favorable,passage
2025-06-11
Under suspension of the rules, the Bill was given its SECOND READING without REFERENCE to the Committee on Bills in the Second Reading.
2025-06-11
The Bill was PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED as Amended by Committee Amendment "A" (H-635).
reading-3
2025-06-11
Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-06-12
Reports READ
2025-06-12
On motion by Senator BEEBE-CENTER of Knox The Minority Ought Not To Pass
2025-06-12
Report ACCEPTED In NON-CONCURRENCE
2025-06-12
Sent down for concurrence
2025-06-12
Speaker FECTEAU of Biddeford MOVED to INSIST.
2025-06-12
Motion of Representative GREENWOOD of Wales to RECEDE and CONCUR to ACCEPTANCE of the Minority Ought Not to Pass Report FAILED.
2025-06-12
ROLL CALL NO. 466
2025-06-12
(Yeas 72 - Nays 75 - Absent 2 - Excused 2)
2025-06-12
Subsequently, the House INSISTED on ACCEPTANCE of the Majority Ought to Pass as Amended Report and PASSAGE TO BE ENGROSSED as Amended by Committee Amendment "A" (H-635)
reading-3
2025-06-12
ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-06-12
On motion by Senator DUSON of Cumberland the Senate INSISTED to ACCEPTANCE of The Minority Ought Not To Pass Report In NON-CONCURRENCE.
2025-06-12
Placed in Legislative Files (DEAD)
failure
2025-05-15
Work Session Held
2025-05-15
Voted - Divided Report
2025-06-10
Reported Out - OTP-AM/ONTP
Versions
Documents
Votes
RECEDE AND CONCUR
2025-06-12 · fail · 72-75
Member-level votes (151)
- ABDI of Lewiston: no
- ADAMS of Lebanon: yes
- ALBERT of Madawaska: yes
- ANKELES of Brunswick: no
- ARATA of New Gloucester: yes
- ARCHER of Saco: no
- ARDELL of Monticello: yes
- ARFORD of Brunswick: no
- BABIN of Fort Fairfield: yes
- BAGSHAW of Windham: yes
- BECK of South Portland: no
- BELL of Yarmouth: no
- BISHOP of Bucksport: yes
- BLIER of Buxton: yes
- BOYER of Poland: yes
- BOYER of Cape Elizabeth: no
- BRENNAN of Portland: no
- BRIDGEO of Augusta: no
- BUNKER of Farmington: no
- CAMPBELL of Orrington: yes
- CARLOW of Buxton: yes
- CARUSO of Caratunk: yes
- CHAPMAN of Auburn: yes
- CIMINO of Bridgton: yes
- CLOUTIER of Lewiston: no
- CLUCHEY of Bowdoinham: no
- COLLAMORE of Pittsfield: yes
- COLLINS of Sidney: yes
- COOPER of Windham: yes
- COPELAND of Saco: no
- CRAFTS of Newcastle: no
- CRAY of Palmyra: yes
- CROCKETT of Portland: no
- DAIGLE of Fort Kent: yes
- DEBRITO of Waterville: no
- DHALAC of South Portland: no
- DILL of Old Town: no
- DODGE of Belfast: no
- DOUDERA of Camden: no
- DRINKWATER of Milford: yes
- DUCHARME of Madison: other
- EATON of Deer Isle: other
- EDER of Waterboro: yes
- FAIRCLOTH of Bangor: no
- FARRIN of Jefferson: no
- FAULKINGHAM of Winter Harbor: yes
- FECTEAU of Biddeford: no
- FLYNN of Albion: yes
- FOLEY of Wells: yes
- FOSTER of Dexter: yes
- FREDERICKS of Sanford: yes
- FREDETTE of Newport: yes
- FRIEDMANN of Bar Harbor: no
- FROST of Belgrade: no
- GATTINE of Westbrook: yes
- GEIGER of Rockland: no
- GERE of Kennebunkport: no
- GIFFORD of Lincoln: yes
- GOLEK of Harpswell: no
- GRAHAM of North Yarmouth: no
- GRAMLICH of Old Orchard Beach: no
- GREENWOOD of Wales: yes
- GRIFFIN of Levant: other
- GUERRETTE of Caribou: yes
- HAGGAN of Hampden: yes
- HALL of Wilton: yes
- HASENFUS of Readfield: no
- HENDERSON of Rumford: yes
- HEPLER of Woolwich: no
- HYMES of Waldo: yes
- JACKSON of Oxford: yes
- JAVNER of Chester: yes
- JULIA of Waterville: no
- KESSLER of South Portland: no
- KUHN of Falmouth: no
- LAJOIE of Lewiston: no
- LANCE of Paris: yes
- LANIGAN of Sanford: yes
- LAVIGNE of Berwick: yes
- LEE of Auburn: no
- LEMELIN of Chelsea: yes
- LIBBY of Auburn: yes
- LOOKNER of Portland: no
- LYMAN of Livermore Falls: yes
- MACIAS of Topsham: no
- MALON of Biddeford: no
- MASON of Lisbon: yes
- MASTRACCIO of Sanford: no
- MATHIESON of Kittery: no
- MATLACK of St. George: no
- MCCABE of Lewiston: no
- MCINTYRE of Lowell: yes
- MEYER of Eliot: no
- MILLIKEN of Blue Hill: no
- MINGO of Calais: yes
- MITCHELL of Cumberland: no
- MONTELL of Gardiner: no
- MOONEN of Portland: no
- MORRIS of Turner: yes
- MURPHY of Scarborough: no
- NUTTING of Oakland: yes
- O'HALLORAN of Brewer: other
- OLSEN of Raymond: yes
- OSHER of Orono: no
- PARRY of Arundel: yes
- PAUL of Winterport: yes
- PERKINS of Dover-Foxcroft: yes
- PLUECKER of Warren: no
- POIRIER of Skowhegan: yes
- POMERLEAU of Standish: yes
- PUGH of Portland: no
- QUINT of Hodgdon: yes
- RANA of Bangor: no
- RAY of Lincolnville: no
- RIELLY of Westbrook: no
- ROBERTS of South Berwick: no
- ROEDER of Bangor: no
- ROLLINS of Augusta: no
- RUDNICKI of Fairfield: yes
- RUNTE of York: no
- SACHS of Freeport: no
- SALISBURY of Westbrook: no
- SARGENT of York: no
- SATO of Gorham: no
- SAYRE of Kennebunk: no
- SCHMERSAL-BURGESS of Mexico: yes
- SHAGOURY of Hallowell: no
- SIMMONS of Waldoboro: yes
- SINCLAIR of Bath: no
- SKOLD of Portland: no
- SMITH of Palermo: yes
- SOBOLESKI of Phillips: yes
- STOVER of Boothbay: no
- STROUT of Harrington: yes
- SUPICA of Bangor: no
- SWALLOW of Houlton: yes
- TERRY of Gorham: no
- THORNE of Carmel: yes
- TUELL of East Machias: yes
- UNDERWOOD of Presque Isle: yes
- WADSWORTH of Hiram: yes
- WALKER of Naples: yes
- WARREN of Scarborough: no
- WEBB of Durham: no
- WHITE of Guilford: yes
- WHITE of Ellsworth: yes
- WOOD of Norway: yes
- WOOD of Greene: yes
- WOODSOME of Waterboro: yes
- YUSUF of Portland: no
- ZAGER of Portland: no
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:53.435176Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=ME&identifier=LD 428. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.