ME LD 418
deadAn Act To Remand Individuals With Pending State Probation Violations To The Department Of Corrections Following Initial Proceedings
Maine · 132 · lower
Quick answers
Did ME LD 418 pass?
No. ME LD 418 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2025-06-05). Latest recorded action (2025-06-05): Placed in Legislative Files (DEAD)
What is ME LD 418 about?
ME LD 418 is a bill in the 132 titled “An Act To Remand Individuals With Pending State Probation Violations To The Department Of Corrections Following Initial Proceedings”.
Who sponsors ME LD 418?
Mathew MCINTYRE is the primary sponsor of ME LD 418, joined by 1 cosponsor.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2025-06-05 — Placed in Legislative Files (DEAD)
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Mathew MCINTYREprimary
- Scott CYRWAYcosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-02-04
Committee on Judiciary suggested and ordered printed.
2025-02-04
The Bill was REFERRED to the Committee on JUDICIARY.
referral-committee
2025-02-04
Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-02-04
The Bill was REFERRED to the Committee on JUDICIARY in concurrence
referral-committee
2025-03-21
Carried over, in the same posture, to the next special or regular session of the 132nd Legislature, pursuant to Joint Order SP 519.
2025-06-04
Reports READ.
2025-06-04
On motion of Representative GRAMLICH of Old Orchard Beach, the Majority Ought Not to Pass Report was ACCEPTED.
committee-failure
2025-06-04
Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-06-05
Reports Read
2025-06-05
On motion by Senator CARNEY of Cumberland the Majority Ought Not to Pass Report ACCEPTED in concurrence. PREVAILED
2025-06-05
Roll Call Ordered Roll Call Number 367 Yeas 19 - Nays 13 - Excused 3 - Absent 0
2025-06-05
Placed in Legislative Files (DEAD)
failure
2025-03-11
Work Session Held
2025-03-11
Voted - Divided Report
2025-06-03
Reported Out - ONTP/OTP-AM
Versions
Documents
Votes
ACCEPT MAJORITY OUGHT NOT TO PASS REPORT
2025-06-05 · pass · 19-13
Member-level votes (35)
- BAILEY of York: yes
- BALDACCI of Penobscot: yes
- BEEBE-CENTER of Knox: yes
- BENNETT of Oxford: no
- BERNARD of Aroostook: no
- BICKFORD of Androscoggin: no
- BLACK of Franklin: no
- BRADSTREET of Kennebec: no
- BRENNER of Cumberland: yes
- CARNEY of Cumberland: yes
- CURRY of Waldo: yes
- CYRWAY of Kennebec: no
- DAUGHTRY of Cumberland: yes
- DUSON of Cumberland: yes
- FARRIN of Somerset: other
- GROHOSKI of Hancock: yes
- GUERIN of Penobscot: no
- HAGGAN of Penobscot: no
- HARRINGTON of York: no
- HICKMAN of Kennebec: yes
- INGWERSEN of York: yes
- LAWRENCE of York: yes
- LIBBY of Cumberland: no
- MARTIN of Oxford: no
- MOORE of Washington: other
- NANGLE of Cumberland: yes
- PIERCE of Cumberland: yes
- RAFFERTY of York: yes
- RENY of Lincoln: yes
- ROTUNDO of Androscoggin: yes
- STEWART of Aroostook: no
- TALBOT ROSS of Cumberland: other
- TEPLER of Sagadahoc: yes
- TIMBERLAKE of Androscoggin: no
- TIPPING of Penobscot: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:53.435176Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=ME&identifier=LD 418. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.