ME LD 2159
deadAn Act To Require School Buses To Be Equipped With And To Use School Bus Crossing Arms
Maine · 132 · lower
Quick answers
Did ME LD 2159 pass?
No. ME LD 2159 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-04-29). Latest recorded action (2026-04-29): Died in Possession of the Senate when the Legislature adjourned Sine Die and was PLACED IN THE LEGISLATIVE FILES. (DEAD)
What is ME LD 2159 about?
ME LD 2159 is a bill in the 132 titled “An Act To Require School Buses To Be Equipped With And To Use School Bus Crossing Arms”.
Who sponsors ME LD 2159?
Valli GEIGER is the primary sponsor of ME LD 2159.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-04-29 — Died in Possession of the Senate when the Legislature adjourned Sine Die and was PLACED IN THE LEGISLATIVE FILES. (DEAD)
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Valli GEIGERprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-01-13
Committee on Transportation suggested and ordered printed.
2026-01-13
The Bill was REFERRED to the Committee on TRANSPORTATION.
referral-committee
2026-01-13
Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2026-01-13
The Bill was REFERRED to the Committee on TRANSPORTATION in concurrence
referral-committee
2026-04-02
CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRST DAY
2026-04-02
On OBJECTION of Representative GOLEK of Harpswell REMOVED.
2026-04-02
The Committee Report was READ and ACCEPTED.
2026-04-02
The Bill was READ ONCE.
reading-1
2026-04-02
Committee Amendment "A" (H-959) was READ.
2026-04-02
On motion of Representative GOLEK of Harpswell, House Amendment "A" (H-963) to Committee Amendment "A" (H-959) was READ and FAILED ADOPTION.
amendment-failure
2026-04-02
ROLL CALL NO. 718
2026-04-02
(Yeas 52 - Nays 92 - Absent 6 - Excused 0 - Vacant 1)
2026-04-02
Subsequently, Committee Amendment "A" (H-959) was ADOPTED.
committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-02
Under suspension of the rules, the Bill was given its SECOND READING without REFERENCE to the Committee on Bills in the Second Reading.
2026-04-02
The Bill was PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED as Amended by Committee Amendment "A" (H-959).
reading-3
2026-04-02
Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2026-04-02
Report READ and ACCEPTED, in concurrence.
2026-04-02
READ ONCE.
reading-1
2026-04-02
Committee Amendment "A" (H-959) READ and ADOPTED, in concurrence.
committee-passage-favorable,passage
2026-04-02
Under suspension of the Rules, READ A SECOND TIME and PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED AS AMENDED BY Committee Amendment "A" (H-959), in concurrence.
reading-2,reading-3
2026-04-02
Ordered sent down forthwith.
2026-04-06
This being an emergency measure, a two-thirds vote of all the members elected to the House was necessary.
2026-04-06
PASSED TO BE ENACTED.
passage
2026-04-06
Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2026-04-06
On motion by Senator ROTUNDO of Androscoggin PLACED ON THE SPECIAL APPROPRIATIONS TABLE pending PASSAGE TO BE ENACTED - Emergency - 2/3 Elected Required, in concurrence.
2026-04-29
Died in Possession of the Senate when the Legislature adjourned Sine Die and was PLACED IN THE LEGISLATIVE FILES. (DEAD)
failure
2026-02-24
Work Session Held - TABLED
2026-03-03
Work Session Held - TABLED
2026-03-12
Work Session Held - TABLED
2026-03-19
Work Session Held
2026-03-19
Voted - OTP-AM
2026-04-01
Reported Out - OTP-AM
Versions
Documents
Votes
ADOPT HAH-963 to CAH-959
2026-04-02 · fail · 52-92
Member-level votes (150)
- ABDI of Lewiston: yes
- ADAMS of Lebanon: no
- ALBERT of Madawaska: no
- ANKELES of Brunswick: no
- ARATA of New Gloucester: no
- ARCHER of Saco: other
- ARDELL of Monticello: no
- ARFORD of Brunswick: yes
- BABIN of Fort Fairfield: no
- BAGSHAW of Windham: no
- BECK of South Portland: yes
- BELL of Yarmouth: yes
- BISHOP of Bucksport: no
- BLIER of Buxton: no
- BOYER of Poland: no
- BOYER of Cape Elizabeth: yes
- BRENNAN of Portland: other
- BRIDGEO of Augusta: yes
- BUNKER of Farmington: yes
- CAMPBELL of Orrington: no
- CARLOW of Buxton: other
- CARUSO of Caratunk: no
- CHAPMAN of Auburn: no
- CIMINO of Bridgton: no
- CLUCHEY of Bowdoinham: yes
- COLLAMORE of Pittsfield: no
- COLLINS of Sidney: no
- COOPER of Windham: no
- COPELAND of Saco: yes
- CRAFTS of Newcastle: no
- CRAY of Palmyra: no
- CROCKETT of Portland: yes
- DAIGLE of Fort Kent: no
- DEBRITO of Waterville: yes
- DHALAC of South Portland: yes
- DILL of Old Town: yes
- DODGE of Belfast: yes
- DOUDERA of Camden: yes
- DRINKWATER of Milford: no
- DUCHARME of Madison: no
- EATON of Deer Isle: no
- EDER of Waterboro: no
- FAIRCLOTH of Bangor: yes
- FARRIN of Jefferson: yes
- FAULKINGHAM of Winter Harbor: no
- FECTEAU of Biddeford: no
- FLYNN of Albion: no
- FOLEY of Wells: no
- FOSTER of Dexter: no
- FREDERICKS of Sanford: no
- FREDETTE of Newport: no
- FRIEDMANN of Bar Harbor: yes
- FROST of Belgrade: yes
- GATTINE of Westbrook: no
- GEIGER of Rockland: yes
- GERE of Kennebunkport: no
- GIFFORD of Lincoln: no
- GOLEK of Harpswell: yes
- GRAHAM of North Yarmouth: no
- GRAMLICH of Old Orchard Beach: yes
- GREENWOOD of Wales: no
- GRIFFIN of Levant: no
- GUERRETTE of Caribou: no
- HAGGAN of Hampden: no
- HALL of Wilton: no
- HARRIMAN of Lewiston: yes
- HASENFUS of Readfield: yes
- HENDERSON of Rumford: no
- HEPLER of Woolwich: no
- HYMES of Waldo: other
- JACKSON of Oxford: no
- JULIA of Waterville: yes
- KESSLER of South Portland: yes
- KUHN of Falmouth: no
- LAJOIE of Lewiston: yes
- LANCE of Paris: no
- LANIGAN of Sanford: no
- LAVIGNE of Berwick: no
- LEE of Auburn: yes
- LEMELIN of Chelsea: other
- LIBBY of Auburn: no
- LOOKNER of Portland: yes
- LYMAN of Livermore Falls: other
- MACIAS of Topsham: yes
- MALON of Biddeford: no
- MASON of Lisbon: no
- MASTRACCIO of Sanford: no
- MATHIESON of Kittery: no
- MATLACK of St. George: yes
- MCCABE of Lewiston: yes
- MCINTYRE of Lowell: no
- MEYER of Eliot: no
- MILLIKEN of Blue Hill: yes
- MINGO of Calais: no
- MITCHELL of Cumberland: yes
- MONTELL of Gardiner: yes
- MOONEN of Portland: yes
- MORRIS of Turner: no
- MURPHY of Scarborough: no
- NUTTING of Oakland: no
- O'HALLORAN of Brewer: no
- OLSEN of Raymond: no
- OSHER of Orono: yes
- PARRY of Arundel: no
- PAUL of Winterport: no
- PERKINS of Dover-Foxcroft: no
- PLUECKER of Warren: no
- POIRIER of Skowhegan: yes
- POMERLEAU of Standish: no
- PUGH of Portland: yes
- QUINT of Hodgdon: no
- RANA of Bangor: yes
- RAY of Lincolnville: no
- RIELLY of Westbrook: no
- ROBERTS of South Berwick: no
- ROEDER of Bangor: yes
- ROLLINS of Augusta: yes
- RUDNICKI of Fairfield: no
- RUNTE of York: no
- SACHS of Freeport: yes
- SALISBURY of Westbrook: no
- SARGENT of York: yes
- SATO of Gorham: yes
- SAYRE of Kennebunk: yes
- SCHMERSAL-BURGESS of Mexico: no
- SHAGOURY of Hallowell: yes
- SIMMONS of Waldoboro: no
- SINCLAIR of Bath: no
- SKOLD of Portland: yes
- SMITH of Palermo: no
- SOBOLESKI of Phillips: no
- STOVER of Boothbay: no
- STROUT of Harrington: no
- SUPICA of Bangor: no
- SWALLOW of Houlton: no
- TERRY of Gorham: no
- THORNE of Carmel: no
- TUELL of East Machias: no
- UNDERWOOD of Presque Isle: no
- WADSWORTH of Hiram: yes
- WALKER of Naples: no
- WARREN of Scarborough: yes
- WEBB of Durham: no
- WHITE of Guilford: no
- WHITE of Ellsworth: no
- WOOD of Norway: no
- WOOD of Greene: no
- WOODSOME of Waterboro: no
- YUSUF of Portland: yes
- ZAGER of Portland: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:53.435176Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=ME&identifier=LD 2159. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.