ME LD 1960

dead

An Act To Exempt Electronic Smoking Devices Or Other Tobacco Products Containing Ingestible Hemp From The Tax Imposed On Tobacco Products

Maine · 132 · upper

Quick answers

Did ME LD 1960 pass?

No. ME LD 1960 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2025-06-18). Latest recorded action (2025-06-18): Placed in Legislative Files (DEAD)

What is ME LD 1960 about?

ME LD 1960 is a bill in the 132 titled “An Act To Exempt Electronic Smoking Devices Or Other Tobacco Products Containing Ingestible Hemp From The Tax Imposed On Tobacco Products”.

Who sponsors ME LD 1960?

Rachel TALBOT ROSS is the primary sponsor of ME LD 1960, joined by 9 cosponsors.

Introduced: —
Latest action: 2025-06-18 — Placed in Legislative Files (DEAD)
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2025-05-07
Committee on VETERANS AND LEGAL AFFAIRS suggested and ordered printed REFERENCE to the Committee on VETERANS AND LEGAL AFFAIRS Ordered sent down forthwith for concurrence
2025-05-13
The Bill was REFERRED to the Committee on TAXATION.
referral-committee
2025-05-13
In NON-CONCURRENCE and sent for concurrence.
2025-05-13
ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-05-14
On motion by Senator PIERCE of Cumberland the Senate RECEDED and CONCURRED to REFERENCE to the Committee on TAXATION
2025-05-14
Ordered sent down forthwith
2025-06-03
Reports Read
2025-06-03
On motion by Senator GROHOSKI of Hancock the Majority Ought to Pass as Amended Report ACCEPTED
2025-06-03
Bill READ ONCE
reading-1
2025-06-03
Committee Amendment "A" (S-231) READ and ADOPTED.
committee-passage-favorable,passage
2025-06-03
Under suspension of the Rules, READ A SECOND TIME and PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED AS AMENDED by Committee Amendment "A" (S-231)
reading-2,reading-3
2025-06-03
Sent down for concurrence
2025-06-04
Reports READ.
2025-06-04
Motion of Representative CLOUTIER of Lewiston to ACCEPT the Majority Ought to Pass as Amended Report FAILED.
2025-06-04
ROLL CALL NO. 308
2025-06-04
(Yeas 52 - Nays 91 - Absent 8 - Excused 0)
2025-06-04
On motion of Representative CLOUTIER of Lewiston, the Minority Ought Not to Pass Report was ACCEPTED.
2025-06-04
In NON-CONCURRENCE and sent for concurrence.
2025-06-04
ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-06-05
On motion by Senator PIERCE of Cumberland Tabled until Later in Today's Session, pending CONSIDERATION.
2025-06-17
Taken from the table by the President
2025-06-17
On motion by Senator TALBOT ROSS of Cumberland the Senate RECEDED from PASSAGE TO BE ENGROSSED AS AMENDED by Committee Amendment "A" (S-231)
reading-3
2025-06-17
On motion by Same Senator Senate Amendment "A" (S-430) READ and ADOPTED
2025-06-17
Under suspension of the Rules, READ A SECOND TIME and PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED AS AMENDED by Committee Amendment "A" (S-231) and Senate Amendment "A" (S-430) in NON-CONCURRENCE
reading-2,reading-3
2025-06-17
Sent down for concurrence
2025-06-18
Speaker FECTEAU of Biddeford MOVED to INSIST.
2025-06-18
Motion of Representative CLOUTIER of Lewiston to RECEDE and CONCUR to PASSAGE TO BE ENGROSSED as Amended by Committee Amendment "A" (S-231) and Senate Amendment "A" (S-430) FAILED.
amendment-failure,reading-3
2025-06-18
ROLL CALL NO. 572
2025-06-18
(Yeas 38 - Nays 110 - Absent 1 - Excused 2)
2025-06-18
Subsequently, the House INSISTED on ACCEPTANCE of the Minority Ought Not to Pass Report.
2025-06-18
ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-06-18
On motion by Senator PIERCE of Cumberland The Senate INSISTED on PASSAGE TO BE ENGROSSED AS AMENDED by Committee Amendment "A" (S-231) as Amended by Senate Amendment "A" (S-430) thereto.
reading-3
2025-06-18
Placed in Legislative Files (DEAD)
failure
2025-05-22
Work Session Held
2025-05-22
Voted - Divided Report
2025-06-02
Reported Out - OTP-AM/ONTP

Versions

Amendment S-A (S-430)Compare
Amendment C-A (S-231)Compare
LD 1960 SP 767Compare
(document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

ACC MAJ OTP AS AMENDED REP
2025-06-04 · fail · 52-91
Member-level votes (151)
- ABDI of Lewiston: no
- ADAMS of Lebanon: no
- ALBERT of Madawaska: no
- ANKELES of Brunswick: no
- ARATA of New Gloucester: no
- ARCHER of Saco: yes
- ARDELL of Monticello: no
- ARFORD of Brunswick: yes
- BABIN of Fort Fairfield: other
- BAGSHAW of Windham: no
- BECK of South Portland: yes
- BELL of Yarmouth: yes
- BISHOP of Bucksport: no
- BLIER of Buxton: no
- BOYER of Poland: yes
- BOYER of Cape Elizabeth: yes
- BRENNAN of Portland: no
- BRIDGEO of Augusta: no
- BUNKER of Farmington: no
- CAMPBELL of Orrington: no
- CARLOW of Buxton: no
- CARUSO of Caratunk: no
- CHAPMAN of Auburn: no
- CIMINO of Bridgton: no
- CLOUTIER of Lewiston: yes
- CLUCHEY of Bowdoinham: yes
- COLLAMORE of Pittsfield: other
- COLLINS of Sidney: no
- COOPER of Windham: no
- COPELAND of Saco: yes
- CRAFTS of Newcastle: yes
- CRAY of Palmyra: no
- CROCKETT of Portland: yes
- DAIGLE of Fort Kent: no
- DEBRITO of Waterville: yes
- DHALAC of South Portland: yes
- DILL of Old Town: yes
- DODGE of Belfast: yes
- DOUDERA of Camden: no
- DRINKWATER of Milford: no
- DUCHARME of Madison: no
- EATON of Deer Isle: other
- EDER of Waterboro: no
- FAIRCLOTH of Bangor: no
- FARRIN of Jefferson: yes
- FAULKINGHAM of Winter Harbor: no
- FECTEAU of Biddeford: no
- FLYNN of Albion: no
- FOLEY of Wells: no
- FOSTER of Dexter: no
- FREDERICKS of Sanford: no
- FREDETTE of Newport: no
- FRIEDMANN of Bar Harbor: yes
- FROST of Belgrade: no
- GATTINE of Westbrook: other
- GEIGER of Rockland: yes
- GERE of Kennebunkport: no
- GIFFORD of Lincoln: no
- GOLEK of Harpswell: no
- GRAHAM of North Yarmouth: no
- GRAMLICH of Old Orchard Beach: no
- GREENWOOD of Wales: no
- GRIFFIN of Levant: other
- GUERRETTE of Caribou: other
- HAGGAN of Hampden: no
- HALL of Wilton: other
- HASENFUS of Readfield: no
- HENDERSON of Rumford: no
- HEPLER of Woolwich: yes
- HYMES of Waldo: no
- JACKSON of Oxford: no
- JAVNER of Chester: no
- JULIA of Waterville: no
- KESSLER of South Portland: no
- KUHN of Falmouth: yes
- LAJOIE of Lewiston: yes
- LANCE of Paris: no
- LANIGAN of Sanford: other
- LAVIGNE of Berwick: no
- LEE of Auburn: yes
- LEMELIN of Chelsea: no
- LIBBY of Auburn: yes
- LOOKNER of Portland: yes
- LYMAN of Livermore Falls: no
- MACIAS of Topsham: yes
- MALON of Biddeford: no
- MASON of Lisbon: no
- MASTRACCIO of Sanford: no
- MATHIESON of Kittery: yes
- MATLACK of St. George: yes
- MCCABE of Lewiston: yes
- MCINTYRE of Lowell: no
- MEYER of Eliot: yes
- MILLIKEN of Blue Hill: yes
- MINGO of Calais: no
- MITCHELL of Cumberland: no
- MONTELL of Gardiner: no
- MOONEN of Portland: no
- MORRIS of Turner: no
- MURPHY of Scarborough: yes
- NUTTING of Oakland: no
- O'HALLORAN of Brewer: no
- OLSEN of Raymond: no
- OSHER of Orono: yes
- PARRY of Arundel: no
- PAUL of Winterport: no
- PERKINS of Dover-Foxcroft: no
- PLUECKER of Warren: yes
- POIRIER of Skowhegan: yes
- POMERLEAU of Standish: no
- PUGH of Portland: yes
- QUINT of Hodgdon: no
- RANA of Bangor: yes
- RAY of Lincolnville: yes
- RIELLY of Westbrook: yes
- ROBERTS of South Berwick: no
- ROEDER of Bangor: yes
- ROLLINS of Augusta: yes
- RUDNICKI of Fairfield: no
- RUNTE of York: yes
- SACHS of Freeport: yes
- SALISBURY of Westbrook: yes
- SARGENT of York: yes
- SATO of Gorham: yes
- SAYRE of Kennebunk: yes
- SCHMERSAL-BURGESS of Mexico: no
- SHAGOURY of Hallowell: no
- SIMMONS of Waldoboro: no
- SINCLAIR of Bath: yes
- SKOLD of Portland: no
- SMITH of Palermo: no
- SOBOLESKI of Phillips: no
- STOVER of Boothbay: yes
- STROUT of Harrington: no
- SUPICA of Bangor: no
- SWALLOW of Houlton: yes
- TERRY of Gorham: yes
- THORNE of Carmel: no
- TUELL of East Machias: no
- UNDERWOOD of Presque Isle: no
- WADSWORTH of Hiram: no
- WALKER of Naples: no
- WARREN of Scarborough: no
- WEBB of Durham: no
- WHITE of Guilford: no
- WHITE of Ellsworth: no
- WOOD of Norway: no
- WOOD of Greene: no
- WOODSOME of Waterboro: no
- YUSUF of Portland: yes
- ZAGER of Portland: yes
RECEDE AND CONCUR
2025-06-18 · fail · 38-110
Member-level votes (151)
- ABDI of Lewiston: yes
- ADAMS of Lebanon: no
- ALBERT of Madawaska: no
- ANKELES of Brunswick: no
- ARATA of New Gloucester: no
- ARCHER of Saco: no
- ARDELL of Monticello: no
- ARFORD of Brunswick: no
- BABIN of Fort Fairfield: no
- BAGSHAW of Windham: no
- BECK of South Portland: yes
- BELL of Yarmouth: no
- BISHOP of Bucksport: no
- BLIER of Buxton: no
- BOYER of Poland: yes
- BOYER of Cape Elizabeth: yes
- BRENNAN of Portland: no
- BRIDGEO of Augusta: no
- BUNKER of Farmington: no
- CAMPBELL of Orrington: no
- CARLOW of Buxton: no
- CARUSO of Caratunk: no
- CHAPMAN of Auburn: no
- CIMINO of Bridgton: no
- CLOUTIER of Lewiston: yes
- CLUCHEY of Bowdoinham: no
- COLLAMORE of Pittsfield: no
- COLLINS of Sidney: no
- COOPER of Windham: no
- COPELAND of Saco: no
- CRAFTS of Newcastle: no
- CRAY of Palmyra: no
- CROCKETT of Portland: yes
- DAIGLE of Fort Kent: no
- DEBRITO of Waterville: no
- DHALAC of South Portland: yes
- DILL of Old Town: yes
- DODGE of Belfast: yes
- DOUDERA of Camden: no
- DRINKWATER of Milford: no
- DUCHARME of Madison: no
- EATON of Deer Isle: other
- EDER of Waterboro: no
- FAIRCLOTH of Bangor: no
- FARRIN of Jefferson: no
- FAULKINGHAM of Winter Harbor: no
- FECTEAU of Biddeford: no
- FLYNN of Albion: no
- FOLEY of Wells: no
- FOSTER of Dexter: no
- FREDERICKS of Sanford: yes
- FREDETTE of Newport: no
- FRIEDMANN of Bar Harbor: yes
- FROST of Belgrade: yes
- GATTINE of Westbrook: no
- GEIGER of Rockland: no
- GERE of Kennebunkport: no
- GIFFORD of Lincoln: no
- GOLEK of Harpswell: yes
- GRAHAM of North Yarmouth: no
- GRAMLICH of Old Orchard Beach: no
- GREENWOOD of Wales: no
- GRIFFIN of Levant: other
- GUERRETTE of Caribou: no
- HAGGAN of Hampden: no
- HALL of Wilton: no
- HASENFUS of Readfield: no
- HENDERSON of Rumford: no
- HEPLER of Woolwich: yes
- HYMES of Waldo: no
- JACKSON of Oxford: no
- JAVNER of Chester: no
- JULIA of Waterville: no
- KESSLER of South Portland: no
- KUHN of Falmouth: no
- LAJOIE of Lewiston: no
- LANCE of Paris: no
- LANIGAN of Sanford: yes
- LAVIGNE of Berwick: other
- LEE of Auburn: yes
- LEMELIN of Chelsea: no
- LIBBY of Auburn: yes
- LOOKNER of Portland: yes
- LYMAN of Livermore Falls: no
- MACIAS of Topsham: yes
- MALON of Biddeford: no
- MASON of Lisbon: no
- MASTRACCIO of Sanford: no
- MATHIESON of Kittery: yes
- MATLACK of St. George: no
- MCCABE of Lewiston: yes
- MCINTYRE of Lowell: no
- MEYER of Eliot: no
- MILLIKEN of Blue Hill: yes
- MINGO of Calais: no
- MITCHELL of Cumberland: no
- MONTELL of Gardiner: no
- MOONEN of Portland: yes
- MORRIS of Turner: no
- MURPHY of Scarborough: no
- NUTTING of Oakland: no
- O'HALLORAN of Brewer: no
- OLSEN of Raymond: no
- OSHER of Orono: yes
- PARRY of Arundel: no
- PAUL of Winterport: no
- PERKINS of Dover-Foxcroft: no
- PLUECKER of Warren: yes
- POIRIER of Skowhegan: no
- POMERLEAU of Standish: no
- PUGH of Portland: yes
- QUINT of Hodgdon: no
- RANA of Bangor: yes
- RAY of Lincolnville: yes
- RIELLY of Westbrook: no
- ROBERTS of South Berwick: no
- ROEDER of Bangor: yes
- ROLLINS of Augusta: no
- RUDNICKI of Fairfield: no
- RUNTE of York: no
- SACHS of Freeport: yes
- SALISBURY of Westbrook: no
- SARGENT of York: no
- SATO of Gorham: yes
- SAYRE of Kennebunk: yes
- SCHMERSAL-BURGESS of Mexico: no
- SHAGOURY of Hallowell: no
- SIMMONS of Waldoboro: no
- SINCLAIR of Bath: yes
- SKOLD of Portland: yes
- SMITH of Palermo: no
- SOBOLESKI of Phillips: no
- STOVER of Boothbay: no
- STROUT of Harrington: yes
- SUPICA of Bangor: yes
- SWALLOW of Houlton: yes
- TERRY of Gorham: yes
- THORNE of Carmel: no
- TUELL of East Machias: no
- UNDERWOOD of Presque Isle: no
- WADSWORTH of Hiram: no
- WALKER of Naples: no
- WARREN of Scarborough: no
- WEBB of Durham: no
- WHITE of Guilford: no
- WHITE of Ellsworth: no
- WOOD of Norway: no
- WOOD of Greene: no
- WOODSOME of Waterboro: no
- YUSUF of Portland: no
- ZAGER of Portland: no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://legislature.maine.gov/LawMakerWeb/subjects.asp?ID=280099177

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:53.435176Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=ME&identifier=LD 1960. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.