ME LD 1535
deadAn Act To Reduce Illegal Cannabis Operations By Requiring Permits For High Electrical Usage
Maine · 132 · upper
Quick answers
Did ME LD 1535 pass?
No. ME LD 1535 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2025-06-09). Latest recorded action (2025-06-09): Placed in the Legislative Files. (DEAD)
What is ME LD 1535 about?
ME LD 1535 is a bill in the 132 titled “An Act To Reduce Illegal Cannabis Operations By Requiring Permits For High Electrical Usage”.
Who sponsors ME LD 1535?
David HAGGAN is the primary sponsor of ME LD 1535, joined by 3 cosponsors.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2025-06-09 — Placed in the Legislative Files. (DEAD)
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- David HAGGANprimary
- Jeffrey TIMBERLAKEcosponsor
- Chad PERKINScosponsor
- Joshua MORRIScosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-04-08
Committee on ENERGY, UTILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY suggested and ordered printed REFERENCE to the Committee on ENERGY, UTILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY Ordered sent down forthwith for concurrence
2025-04-08
The Bill was REFERRED to the Committee on ENERGY, UTILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY.
referral-committee
2025-04-08
In concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-06-04
Reports READ
2025-06-04
On motion by Senator LAWRENCE of York The Minority Ought Not To Pass Report ACCEPTED. PREVAILED
2025-06-04
Roll Call Ordered Roll Call Number 354 Yeas 17 - Nays 16 - Excused 2 - Absent 0
2025-06-04
Sent down for concurrence
2025-06-05
Reports READ.
2025-06-05
On motion of Representative SACHS of Freeport, the Majority Ought to Pass as Amended Report was ACCEPTED.
2025-06-05
The Bill was READ ONCE.
reading-1
2025-06-05
Committee Amendment "A" (S-264) was READ and ADOPTED.
committee-passage-favorable,passage
2025-06-05
Under suspension of the rules, the Bill was given its SECOND READING without REFERENCE to the Committee on Bills in the Second Reading.
2025-06-05
The Bill was PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED as Amended by Committee Amendment "A" (S-264).
reading-3
2025-06-05
In NON-CONCURRENCE and sent for concurrence.
2025-06-05
ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-06-05
Senator PIERCE of Cumberland moved the Senate INSIST on ACCEPTANCE of The Minority Ought Not To Pass Report.
2025-06-05
Motion by Senator STEWART of Aroostook to RECEDE and CONCUR FAILED
2025-06-05
Roll Call Ordered Roll Call Number 379 Yeas 14 - Nays 18 - Excused 3 - Absent 0
2025-06-05
Subsequently, The Senate INSISTED on ACCEPTANCE of The Minority Ought Not To Pass Report.
2025-06-05
Sent down for concurrence
2025-06-09
The House INSISTED on ACCEPTANCE of the Majority Ought to Pass as Amended Report and PASSAGE TO BE ENGROSSED as Amended by Committee Amendment "A" (S-264)
reading-3
2025-06-09
ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-06-09
Placed in the Legislative Files. (DEAD)
failure
2025-05-01
Work Session Held - TABLED
2025-05-08
Work Session Held - TABLED
2025-05-14
Work Session Held - TABLED
2025-05-20
Work Session Held
2025-05-20
Voted - Divided Report
2025-06-04
Reported Out - OTP-AM/ONTP
Versions
Documents
Votes
ACCEPT MINORITY OUGHT NOT TO PASS REPORT
2025-06-04 · pass · 17-16
Member-level votes (35)
- BAILEY of York: yes
- BALDACCI of Penobscot: yes
- BEEBE-CENTER of Knox: yes
- BENNETT of Oxford: no
- BERNARD of Aroostook: no
- BICKFORD of Androscoggin: no
- BLACK of Franklin: other
- BRADSTREET of Kennebec: no
- BRENNER of Cumberland: yes
- CARNEY of Cumberland: yes
- CURRY of Waldo: yes
- CYRWAY of Kennebec: no
- DAUGHTRY of Cumberland: yes
- DUSON of Cumberland: yes
- FARRIN of Somerset: other
- GROHOSKI of Hancock: no
- GUERIN of Penobscot: no
- HAGGAN of Penobscot: no
- HARRINGTON of York: no
- HICKMAN of Kennebec: yes
- INGWERSEN of York: yes
- LAWRENCE of York: yes
- LIBBY of Cumberland: no
- MARTIN of Oxford: no
- MOORE of Washington: no
- NANGLE of Cumberland: yes
- PIERCE of Cumberland: yes
- RAFFERTY of York: yes
- RENY of Lincoln: no
- ROTUNDO of Androscoggin: yes
- STEWART of Aroostook: no
- TALBOT ROSS of Cumberland: yes
- TEPLER of Sagadahoc: yes
- TIMBERLAKE of Androscoggin: no
- TIPPING of Penobscot: no
RECEDE AND CONCUR
2025-06-05 · fail · 14-18
Member-level votes (35)
- BAILEY of York: no
- BALDACCI of Penobscot: no
- BEEBE-CENTER of Knox: no
- BENNETT of Oxford: yes
- BERNARD of Aroostook: yes
- BICKFORD of Androscoggin: yes
- BLACK of Franklin: yes
- BRADSTREET of Kennebec: yes
- BRENNER of Cumberland: no
- CARNEY of Cumberland: no
- CURRY of Waldo: no
- CYRWAY of Kennebec: yes
- DAUGHTRY of Cumberland: no
- DUSON of Cumberland: no
- FARRIN of Somerset: other
- GROHOSKI of Hancock: yes
- GUERIN of Penobscot: yes
- HAGGAN of Penobscot: yes
- HARRINGTON of York: yes
- HICKMAN of Kennebec: no
- INGWERSEN of York: no
- LAWRENCE of York: no
- LIBBY of Cumberland: yes
- MARTIN of Oxford: yes
- MOORE of Washington: other
- NANGLE of Cumberland: no
- PIERCE of Cumberland: no
- RAFFERTY of York: no
- RENY of Lincoln: other
- ROTUNDO of Androscoggin: no
- STEWART of Aroostook: yes
- TALBOT ROSS of Cumberland: no
- TEPLER of Sagadahoc: no
- TIMBERLAKE of Androscoggin: yes
- TIPPING of Penobscot: no
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:53.435176Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=ME&identifier=LD 1535. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.