ME LD 1020
deadAn Act To Repeal The Laws Providing For The Construction Of A Connector To Gorham And To Resell Land Taken Under Those Laws To Previous Property Owners
Maine · 132 · upper
Quick answers
Did ME LD 1020 pass?
No. ME LD 1020 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2025-06-13). Latest recorded action (2025-06-13): Placed in the Legislative Files. (DEAD)
What is ME LD 1020 about?
ME LD 1020 is a bill in the 132 titled “An Act To Repeal The Laws Providing For The Construction Of A Connector To Gorham And To Resell Land Taken Under Those Laws To Previous Property Owners”.
Who sponsors ME LD 1020?
Stacy BRENNER is the primary sponsor of ME LD 1020, joined by 7 cosponsors.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2025-06-13 — Placed in the Legislative Files. (DEAD)
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Stacy BRENNERprimary
- Parnell TERRYcosponsor
- Eleanor SATOcosponsor
- Laurie OSHERcosponsor
- Sophia WARRENcosponsor
- Drew GATTINEcosponsor
- Anne CARNEYcosponsor
- Kelly MURPHYcosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-03-12
Received by the Secretary of the Senate on March 12, 2025 and REFERRED to the Committee on TRANSPORTATION pursuant to Joint Rule 308.2
receipt,referral-committee
2025-03-21
CARRIED OVER, in the same posture, to the next special or regular session of the 132nd Legislature, pursuant to Joint Order SP 519.
2025-06-13
Reports READ
2025-06-13
Motion by Senator NANGLE of Cumberland to ACCEPT the Minority Ought to Pass As Amended Report FAILED
2025-06-13
Roll Call Ordered Roll Call Number 498 Yeas 16 - Nays 17 - Excused 2 - Absent 0
2025-06-13
Subsequently, The Majority Ought Not To Pass Report ACCEPTED
2025-06-13
Sent down for concurrence
2025-06-13
Reports READ.
2025-06-13
On motion of Representative CRAFTS of Newcastle, the Majority Ought Not to Pass Report was ACCEPTED.
committee-failure
2025-06-13
In concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
2025-06-13
Placed in the Legislative Files. (DEAD)
failure
2025-05-07
Work Session Held
2025-05-07
Voted - Divided Report
2025-06-12
Reported Out - ONTP/OTP-AM
Versions
Documents
Votes
ACCEPT MINORITY OUGHT TO PASS AS AMENDED REPORT
2025-06-12 · fail · 16-17
Member-level votes (35)
- BAILEY of York: yes
- BALDACCI of Penobscot: yes
- BEEBE-CENTER of Knox: yes
- BENNETT of Oxford: no
- BERNARD of Aroostook: no
- BICKFORD of Androscoggin: no
- BLACK of Franklin: no
- BRADSTREET of Kennebec: no
- BRENNER of Cumberland: yes
- CARNEY of Cumberland: yes
- CURRY of Waldo: yes
- CYRWAY of Kennebec: no
- DAUGHTRY of Cumberland: yes
- DUSON of Cumberland: yes
- FARRIN of Somerset: no
- GROHOSKI of Hancock: yes
- GUERIN of Penobscot: no
- HAGGAN of Penobscot: no
- HARRINGTON of York: no
- HICKMAN of Kennebec: yes
- INGWERSEN of York: yes
- LAWRENCE of York: yes
- LIBBY of Cumberland: no
- MARTIN of Oxford: no
- MOORE of Washington: no
- NANGLE of Cumberland: no
- PIERCE of Cumberland: no
- RAFFERTY of York: yes
- RENY of Lincoln: other
- ROTUNDO of Androscoggin: other
- STEWART of Aroostook: no
- TALBOT ROSS of Cumberland: yes
- TEPLER of Sagadahoc: yes
- TIMBERLAKE of Androscoggin: no
- TIPPING of Penobscot: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:53.435176Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=ME&identifier=LD 1020. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.