Bill Commons

MD SB 932

died on adjournment

Consumer Protection - Social Media Platforms - Display of User Location

Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Quick answers

Did MD SB 932 pass?

No. MD SB 932 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-03-24): Hearing 4/01 at 1:00 p.m.

What is MD SB 932 about?

MD SB 932 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Consumer Protection - Social Media Platforms - Display of User Location”.

Who sponsors MD SB 932?

Harris is the primary sponsor of MD SB 932.

Introduced
Latest action
2026-03-24 — Hearing 4/01 at 1:00 p.m.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Sponsors

  • Harrisprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2026-02-06

    First Reading Finance

    referral-committee

  2. 2026-02-12

    Hearing 3/12 at 1:00 p.m.

  3. 2026-03-23

    Favorable with Amendments Report by Finance

    committee-passage-favorable

  4. 2026-03-23

    Favorable with Amendments {

    committee-passage-favorable

  5. 2026-03-23

    Motion Laid Over (Senator West) Adopted

  6. 2026-03-23

    Favorable with Amendments {

    committee-passage-favorable

  7. 2026-03-23

    Floor Amendment {

  8. 2026-03-23

    Floor Amendment {

  9. 2026-03-23

    Second Reading Passed with Amendments

  10. 2026-03-23

    Third Reading Passed

    passage

  11. 2026-03-24

    Referred Economic Matters

    referral-committee

  12. 2026-03-24

    Hearing 4/01 at 1:00 p.m.

Versions

  • Third - Consumer Protection - Social Media Platforms - Display of User LocationCompare
  • First - Consumer Protection - Social Media Platforms - Display of User LocationCompare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • On Third Reading

    2026-03-08 · pass · 42-0

    Member-level votes (47)
    • Mr. President: yes
    • Feldman: yes
    • Hester: yes
    • Lewis Young: yes
    • Smith: yes
    • Attar: yes
    • Folden: yes
    • Hettleman: yes
    • Love: yes
    • Sydnor: yes
    • Augustine: yes
    • Gallion: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Mautz: yes
    • Waldstreicher: yes
    • Bailey: yes
    • Gile: yes
    • Jennings: yes
    • McCray: yes
    • Washington, A.: yes
    • Beidle: yes
    • Guzzone: yes
    • Kagan: yes
    • McKay: yes
    • Washington, M.: yes
    • Brooks: yes
    • Harris: yes
    • King: yes
    • Ready: yes
    • Watson: yes
    • Carozza: yes
    • Hayes: yes
    • Kramer: yes
    • Rosapepe: yes
    • West: yes
    • Charles: yes
    • Henson: yes
    • Lam: yes
    • Salling: yes
    • Zucker: yes
    • Corderman: yes
    • Hershey: yes
    • Ellis: not voting
    • Muse: not voting
    • Benson: absent
    • James: absent
    • Simonaire: absent

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=SB 932. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.