MD SB 387

died on adjournment

Food Retailers and Third-Party Food Delivery Service Providers - Dynamic Pricing and Personal Data (Protection From Predatory Pricing Act)

Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Quick answers

Did MD SB 387 pass?

No. MD SB 387 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-03-24): Hearing 3/31 at 1:00 p.m.

What is MD SB 387 about?

MD SB 387 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Food Retailers and Third-Party Food Delivery Service Providers - Dynamic Pricing and Personal Data (Protection From Predatory Pricing Act)”.

Who sponsors MD SB 387?

Zucker, Sydnor, Hester and 12 others are the primary sponsors of MD SB 387.

Introduced: —
Latest action: 2026-03-24 — Hearing 3/31 at 1:00 p.m.
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2026-01-27
First Reading Finance
referral-committee
2026-01-29
Hearing 2/12 at 1:00 p.m.
2026-02-06
Hearing canceled
2026-02-06
Hearing 2/17 at 1:00 p.m.
2026-03-20
Favorable with Amendments Report by Finance
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-20
Favorable with Amendments {
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-20
Second Reading Passed with Amendments
2026-03-23
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-03-23
Referred Economic Matters
referral-committee
2026-03-24
Hearing 3/31 at 1:00 p.m.

Versions

Third - Food Retailers and Third-Party Food Delivery Service Providers - Dynamic Pricing and Personal Data (Protection From Predatory Pricing Act)Compare
First - Food Retailers - Dynamic Pricing, Surveillance Data, and Collective Bargaining Agreements (Protection From Predatory Pricing Act)Compare
(document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

On Third Reading
2026-03-06 · pass · 31-12
Member-level votes (47)
- Mr. President: yes
- Gile: yes
- Hettleman: yes
- Lewis Young: yes
- Sydnor: yes
- Attar: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Love: yes
- Waldstreicher: yes
- Augustine: yes
- Harris: yes
- Kagan: yes
- McCray: yes
- Washington, A.: yes
- Beidle: yes
- Hayes: yes
- King: yes
- Muse: yes
- Washington, M.: yes
- Brooks: yes
- Henson: yes
- Kramer: yes
- Rosapepe: yes
- Watson: yes
- Charles: yes
- Hester: yes
- Lam: yes
- Smith: yes
- Zucker: yes
- Feldman: yes
- Bailey: no
- Gallion: no
- Mautz: no
- Ready: no
- Simonaire: no
- Carozza: no
- Hershey: no
- McKay: no
- Salling: no
- West: no
- Corderman: no
- Jennings: no
- Ellis: not voting
- Benson: absent
- Folden: absent
- James: absent

Related bills

Companion bill: HB 895

Official source

http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/sb0387?ys=2026RS

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=SB 387. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.