Bill Commons

IN SB 241

enacted

Utility service enhancement improvement costs.

Indiana · 2026 Regular Session (2nd Regular Session, 124th General Assembly) · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did IN SB 241 pass?

Yes. IN SB 241 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-03-05): Public Law 127

What is IN SB 241 about?

Amends the statute that authorizes a conservancy district providing water service to withdraw from the jurisdiction of the Indiana utility regulatory commission (IURC) if the conservancy district serves less than 2,000 customers, so as to authorize a withdrawal from the IURC's jurisdiction if the conservancy district serves less than 3,000 customers. Amends the existing statute authorizing alternative regulatory procedures for water or sewer utilities with customer bases not exceeding specified numbers to include within the scope of the statute a procedure that promotes economic development opportunities in rural areas while providing just and reasonable protections to a utility's existing ratepayers. Prohibits a water or wastewater utility (utility) from charging or collecting a capacity related fee or a tap fee to an eligible customer for connecting workforce housing to the utility's water or wastewater system (system) under certain circumstances. Provides that if the utility determines that the extension of service to the workforce housing will not result in a positive contribution to the utility's overall cost of service over a 20 year period, the utility may charge and collect from the eligible customer a capacity related fee or a tap fee that does not exceed the difference between: (1) the otherwise applicable capacity related fee or tap fee; minus (2) the contribution to the utility's overall cost of service over a 20 year period that will result from the extension of service to the workforce housing. Provides that for purposes of these provisions, an "eligible customer" means a not-for-profit organization that: (1) has entered into an agreement with the Indiana housing and community development authority under which the person will construct workforce housing in Indiana; and (2) seeks to connect the workforce housing to the system of a utility under the terms of a special contract with the utility. Authorizes a water or wastewater utility that is eligible under existing law to recover costs for service enhancement improvements (eligible utility) to adjust the statutory adjustment tracker to reflect certain per unit chemical and power costs if those costs have increased or decreased by more than 3% over the two most recent years. Provides that if the costs: (1) have increased by more than 3% over the two year period, the amount of the adjustment shall be included in the adjustment rider as an expense; or (2) have decreased by more than 3% over the two year period, the amount of the adjustment shall be included in the adjustment rider as a credit. Provides that an eligible utility is not required to seek preapproval of a plan from the IURC in order to seek recovery of the costs of chemicals and power. Requires an eligible utility for which the IURC has issued an order approving an adjustment rider for the recovery of chemical or power costs to file a petition for a change in its adjustment amount: (1) not later than 30 days after the end of each 12 month period after the date of the IURC's order approving the adjustment rider; and (2) until the IURC issues an order in the eligible utility's next general rate case. Specifies that the costs of chemicals and power may be recovered in full and without deferring 20% of the costs for recovery as part of the eligible utility's next general rate case.

Who sponsors IN SB 241?

Edmond Soliday, Andrea Hunley, Spencer Deery and 1 others are the primary sponsors of IN SB 241, joined by 4 cosponsors.

Description

Amends the statute that authorizes a conservancy district providing water service to withdraw from the jurisdiction of the Indiana utility regulatory commission (IURC) if the conservancy district serves less than 2,000 customers, so as to authorize a withdrawal from the IURC's jurisdiction if the conservancy district serves less than 3,000 customers. Amends the existing statute authorizing alternative regulatory procedures for water or sewer utilities with customer bases not exceeding specified numbers to include within the scope of the statute a procedure that promotes economic development opportunities in rural areas while providing just and reasonable protections to a utility's existing ratepayers. Prohibits a water or wastewater utility (utility) from charging or collecting a capacity related fee or a tap fee to an eligible customer for connecting workforce housing to the utility's water or wastewater system (system) under certain circumstances. Provides that if the utility determines that the extension of service to the workforce housing will not result in a positive contribution to the utility's overall cost of service over a 20 year period, the utility may charge and collect from the eligible customer a capacity related fee or a tap fee that does not exceed the difference between: (1) the otherwise applicable capacity related fee or tap fee; minus (2) the contribution to the utility's overall cost of service over a 20 year period that will result from the extension of service to the workforce housing. Provides that for purposes of these provisions, an "eligible customer" means a not-for-profit organization that: (1) has entered into an agreement with the Indiana housing and community development authority under which the person will construct workforce housing in Indiana; and (2) seeks to connect the workforce housing to the system of a utility under the terms of a special contract with the utility. Authorizes a water or wastewater utility that is eligible under existing law to recover costs for service enhancement improvements (eligible utility) to adjust the statutory adjustment tracker to reflect certain per unit chemical and power costs if those costs have increased or decreased by more than 3% over the two most recent years. Provides that if the costs: (1) have increased by more than 3% over the two year period, the amount of the adjustment shall be included in the adjustment rider as an expense; or (2) have decreased by more than 3% over the two year period, the amount of the adjustment shall be included in the adjustment rider as a credit. Provides that an eligible utility is not required to seek preapproval of a plan from the IURC in order to seek recovery of the costs of chemicals and power. Requires an eligible utility for which the IURC has issued an order approving an adjustment rider for the recovery of chemical or power costs to file a petition for a change in its adjustment amount: (1) not later than 30 days after the end of each 12 month period after the date of the IURC's order approving the adjustment rider; and (2) until the IURC issues an order in the eligible utility's next general rate case. Specifies that the costs of chemicals and power may be recovered in full and without deferring 20% of the costs for recovery as part of the eligible utility's next general rate case.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-03-05 — Public Law 127
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Edmond Solidaysponsor
  • Andrea Hunleyauthor
  • Spencer Deeryauthor
  • Eric Kochauthor
  • Blake Doriotcoauthor
  • Dave Hallcosponsor
  • Randy Maxwellcoauthor
  • Jim Presselcosponsor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-03-05

    Public Law 127

    became-law

  2. 2026-03-05

    Signed by the Governor

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-02-27

    Signed by the Speaker

    passage

  4. 2026-02-27

    Signed by the President of the Senate

    passage

  5. 2026-02-27

    Signed by the President Pro Tempore

    passage

  6. 2026-02-25

    Senate concurred with House amendments; Roll Call 284: yeas 44, nays 3

  7. 2026-02-16

    Motion to concur filed

    filing

  8. 2026-02-10

    Returned to the Senate with amendments

    receipt

  9. 2026-02-09

    Third reading: passed; Roll Call 210: yeas 91, nays 3

    passage,reading-3,reading-3

  10. 2026-02-05

    Second reading: ordered engrossed

    reading-2

  11. 2026-02-03

    Representatives Hall, Pressel added as cosponsors

  12. 2026-02-03

    Committee report: amend do pass, adopted

    committee-passage

  13. 2026-01-28

    First reading: referred to Committee on Utilities, Energy and Telecommunications

    reading-1,referral-committee

  14. 2026-01-23

    Referred to the House

    referral

  15. 2026-01-22

    House sponsor: Representative Soliday

  16. 2026-01-22

    Third reading: passed; Roll Call 59: yeas 42, nays 2

    passage,reading-3,reading-3

  17. 2026-01-20

    Second reading: ordered engrossed

    reading-2

  18. 2026-01-15

    Senators Doriot, Maxwell added as coauthors

  19. 2026-01-15

    Committee report: amend do pass, adopted

    committee-passage

  20. 2026-01-15

    Senator Hunley added as third author

  21. 2026-01-15

    Senator Deery added as second author

  22. 2026-01-08

    Authored by Senator Koch

  23. 2026-01-08

    First reading: referred to Committee on Utilities

    reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • SB 241 - Koch - 3rd Reading

    2026-01-22 · pass · 42-2

    Member-level votes (49)
    • Alexander: yes
    • Clark: yes
    • Holdman: yes
    • Raatz: yes
    • Alting: yes
    • Crider: yes
    • Hunley: yes
    • Randolph: yes
    • Baldwin: yes
    • Deery: yes
    • Jackson, L: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Bohacek: yes
    • Dernulc: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Schmitt: yes
    • Bray: yes
    • Doriot: yes
    • Koch: yes
    • Spencer: yes
    • Brown: yes
    • Ford J.D.: yes
    • Leising: yes
    • Walker G: yes
    • Buchanan: yes
    • Freeman: yes
    • Maxwell: yes
    • Walker K: yes
    • Buck: yes
    • Garten: yes
    • Niemeyer: yes
    • Yoder: yes
    • Byrne: yes
    • Gaskill: yes
    • Niezgodski: yes
    • Young: yes
    • Carrasco: yes
    • Glick: yes
    • Pol: yes
    • Charbonneau: yes
    • Goode: yes
    • Qaddoura: yes
    • Taylor: no
    • Tomes: no
    • Becker: excused
    • Mishler: excused
    • Bassler: not voting
    • Busch: not voting
    • Donato: not voting
  • SB 241 - Soliday - 3rd Reading

    2026-02-09 · pass · 91-3

    Member-level votes (100)
    • Abbott: yes
    • Engleman: yes
    • Klinker: yes
    • Pierce, K: yes
    • Andrade: yes
    • Errington: yes
    • Lauer: yes
    • Pierce, M: yes
    • Aylesworth: yes
    • Garcia Wilburn: yes
    • Lawson: yes
    • Porter: yes
    • Baird: yes
    • Genda: yes
    • Ledbetter: yes
    • Prescott: yes
    • Barrett: yes
    • GiaQuinta: yes
    • Lehman: yes
    • Pressel: yes
    • Bartels: yes
    • Gore: yes
    • Lopez: yes
    • Pryor: yes
    • Bartlett: yes
    • Goss-Reaves: yes
    • Lucas: yes
    • Rowray: yes
    • Bascom: yes
    • Greene: yes
    • Manning: yes
    • Slager: yes
    • Bauer: yes
    • Haggard: yes
    • May: yes
    • Smaltz: yes
    • Behning: yes
    • Hall: yes
    • Mayfield: yes
    • Smith, H: yes
    • Borders: yes
    • Harris: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Smith, V: yes
    • Burton: yes
    • Hatcher: yes
    • McNamara: yes
    • Snow: yes
    • Campbell: yes
    • Heaton: yes
    • Meltzer: yes
    • Soliday: yes
    • Carbaugh: yes
    • Hostettler: yes
    • Miller, D: yes
    • Steuerwald: yes
    • Cash: yes
    • Ireland: yes
    • Miller, K: yes
    • Summers: yes
    • Clere: yes
    • Isa: yes
    • Morris: yes
    • Sweet: yes
    • Commons: yes
    • Jackson, C: yes
    • Novak: yes
    • Teshka: yes
    • Criswell: yes
    • Jeter: yes
    • O'Brien: yes
    • Thompson: yes
    • Culp: yes
    • Johnson, B: yes
    • Olthoff: yes
    • VanNatter: yes
    • Dant Chesser: yes
    • Jordan: yes
    • Pack: yes
    • Wesco: yes
    • Davis: yes
    • Judy: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Yocum: yes
    • DeLaney: yes
    • Karickhoff: yes
    • Payne: yes
    • Zimmerman: yes
    • DeVon: yes
    • King: yes
    • Pfaff: yes
    • Dvorak: no
    • Moed: no
    • Moseley: no
    • Hamilton: excused
    • Lindauer: excused
    • Shackleford: excused
    • Shonkwiler: excused
    • Heine: excused
    • Mr. Speaker: not voting
  • SB 241 - Koch

    2026-02-25 · pass · 44-3

    Member-level votes (50)
    • Alexander: yes
    • Carrasco: yes
    • Goode: yes
    • Qaddoura: yes
    • Alting: yes
    • Charbonneau: yes
    • Holdman: yes
    • Raatz: yes
    • Baldwin: yes
    • Clark: yes
    • Hunley: yes
    • Randolph: yes
    • Bassler: yes
    • Crider: yes
    • Jackson, L: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Deery: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Schmitt: yes
    • Bray: yes
    • Dernulc: yes
    • Koch: yes
    • Spencer: yes
    • Brown: yes
    • Donato: yes
    • Leising: yes
    • Taylor: yes
    • Buchanan: yes
    • Ford J.D.: yes
    • Maxwell: yes
    • Walker G: yes
    • Buck: yes
    • Garten: yes
    • McKinley: yes
    • Walker K: yes
    • Busch: yes
    • Gaskill: yes
    • Niemeyer: yes
    • Yoder: yes
    • Byrne: yes
    • Glick: yes
    • Niezgodski: yes
    • Young: yes
    • Bohacek: no
    • Freeman: no
    • Tomes: no
    • Pol: excused
    • Doriot: not voting
    • Mishler: not voting

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:22:09.317128Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=IN&identifier=SB 241. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.