Bill Commons

IN SB 169

enacted

Reorganization of consumer lending laws.

Indiana · 2026 Regular Session (2nd Regular Session, 124th General Assembly) · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did IN SB 169 pass?

Yes. IN SB 169 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-03-05): Public Law 115

What is IN SB 169 about?

Repeals the statutes governing first lien mortgage lending, small loans, mortgage rescue protection fraud, and home loan practices and the Uniform Consumer Credit Code. Recodifies the repealed statutes in a new title of the Indiana Code concerning consumer lending (Title 37). Conforms the structure and organization of the recodified statutes to the requirements of the general assembly's drafting manual. Makes conforming changes to cross-references.

Who sponsors IN SB 169?

Jake Teshka, Scott Baldwin are the primary sponsors of IN SB 169, joined by 1 cosponsor.

Description

Repeals the statutes governing first lien mortgage lending, small loans, mortgage rescue protection fraud, and home loan practices and the Uniform Consumer Credit Code. Recodifies the repealed statutes in a new title of the Indiana Code concerning consumer lending (Title 37). Conforms the structure and organization of the recodified statutes to the requirements of the general assembly's drafting manual. Makes conforming changes to cross-references.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-03-05 — Public Law 115
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Jake Teshkasponsor
  • Scott Baldwinauthor
  • Lonnie Randolphcoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-03-05

    Public Law 115

    became-law

  2. 2026-03-05

    Signed by the Governor

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-02-27

    Signed by the Speaker

    passage

  4. 2026-02-27

    Signed by the President of the Senate

    passage

  5. 2026-02-27

    Signed by the President Pro Tempore

    passage

  6. 2026-02-25

    Senate concurred with House amendments; Roll Call 278: yeas 46, nays 0

  7. 2026-02-24

    Motion to concur filed

    filing

  8. 2026-02-24

    Returned to the Senate with amendments

    receipt

  9. 2026-02-23

    Third reading: passed; Roll Call 305: yeas 93, nays 1

    passage,reading-3,reading-3

  10. 2026-02-19

    Second reading: ordered engrossed

    reading-2

  11. 2026-02-17

    Committee report: amend do pass, adopted

    committee-passage

  12. 2026-01-28

    First reading: referred to Committee on Financial Institutions

    reading-1,referral-committee

  13. 2026-01-23

    Referred to the House

    referral

  14. 2026-01-22

    House sponsor: Representative Teshka

  15. 2026-01-22

    Third reading: passed; Roll Call 53: yeas 43, nays 1

    passage,reading-3,reading-3

  16. 2026-01-20

    Second reading: ordered engrossed

    reading-2

  17. 2026-01-15

    Senator Randolph added as coauthor

  18. 2026-01-15

    Committee report: amend do pass, adopted

    committee-passage

  19. 2026-01-05

    Authored by Senator Baldwin

  20. 2026-01-05

    First reading: referred to Committee on Insurance and Financial Institutions

    reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • SB 169 - Baldwin - 3rd Reading

    2026-01-22 · pass · 43-1

    Member-level votes (49)
    • Alexander: yes
    • Crider: yes
    • Holdman: yes
    • Raatz: yes
    • Alting: yes
    • Deery: yes
    • Hunley: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Baldwin: yes
    • Dernulc: yes
    • Jackson, L: yes
    • Schmitt: yes
    • Bohacek: yes
    • Donato: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Spencer: yes
    • Bray: yes
    • Doriot: yes
    • Koch: yes
    • Taylor: yes
    • Brown: yes
    • Ford J.D.: yes
    • Leising: yes
    • Tomes: yes
    • Buck: yes
    • Freeman: yes
    • Maxwell: yes
    • Walker G: yes
    • Byrne: yes
    • Garten: yes
    • Niemeyer: yes
    • Walker K: yes
    • Carrasco: yes
    • Gaskill: yes
    • Niezgodski: yes
    • Yoder: yes
    • Charbonneau: yes
    • Glick: yes
    • Pol: yes
    • Young: yes
    • Clark: yes
    • Goode: yes
    • Qaddoura: yes
    • Buchanan: no
    • Becker: excused
    • Mishler: excused
    • Bassler: not voting
    • Busch: not voting
    • Randolph: not voting
  • SB 169 - Teshka - 3rd Reading

    2026-02-23 · pass · 93-1

    Member-level votes (100)
    • Abbott: yes
    • Errington: yes
    • Klinker: yes
    • Porter: yes
    • Andrade: yes
    • Garcia Wilburn: yes
    • Lauer: yes
    • Prescott: yes
    • Aylesworth: yes
    • Genda: yes
    • Lawson: yes
    • Pressel: yes
    • Baird: yes
    • GiaQuinta: yes
    • Ledbetter: yes
    • Rowray: yes
    • Barrett: yes
    • Gore: yes
    • Lehman: yes
    • Shackleford: yes
    • Bartels: yes
    • Goss-Reaves: yes
    • Lindauer: yes
    • Shonkwiler: yes
    • Bartlett: yes
    • Greene: yes
    • Lopez: yes
    • Slager: yes
    • Bascom: yes
    • Haggard: yes
    • Lucas: yes
    • Smaltz: yes
    • Bauer: yes
    • Hall: yes
    • Manning: yes
    • Smith, H: yes
    • Borders: yes
    • Hamilton: yes
    • May: yes
    • Smith, V: yes
    • Burton: yes
    • Harris: yes
    • Mayfield: yes
    • Snow: yes
    • Campbell: yes
    • Hatcher: yes
    • McNamara: yes
    • Soliday: yes
    • Carbaugh: yes
    • Heaton: yes
    • Meltzer: yes
    • Steuerwald: yes
    • Cash: yes
    • Heine: yes
    • Miller, D: yes
    • Summers: yes
    • Clere: yes
    • Hostettler: yes
    • Morris: yes
    • Sweet: yes
    • Commons: yes
    • Ireland: yes
    • Novak: yes
    • Teshka: yes
    • Criswell: yes
    • Isa: yes
    • O'Brien: yes
    • Thompson: yes
    • Culp: yes
    • Jackson, C: yes
    • Olthoff: yes
    • VanNatter: yes
    • Dant Chesser: yes
    • Jeter: yes
    • Pack: yes
    • Wesco: yes
    • Davis: yes
    • Johnson, B: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Yocum: yes
    • DeLaney: yes
    • Jordan: yes
    • Payne: yes
    • Zimmerman: yes
    • DeVon: yes
    • Judy: yes
    • Pfaff: yes
    • Dvorak: yes
    • Karickhoff: yes
    • Pierce, K: yes
    • Engleman: yes
    • King: yes
    • Pierce, M: yes
    • Pryor: no
    • Behning: excused
    • McGuire: excused
    • Moed: excused
    • Moseley: excused
    • Miller, K: not voting
    • Mr. Speaker: not voting
  • SB 169 - Baldwin

    2026-02-25 · pass · 46-0

    Member-level votes (50)
    • Alexander: yes
    • Carrasco: yes
    • Goode: yes
    • Randolph: yes
    • Alting: yes
    • Charbonneau: yes
    • Holdman: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Baldwin: yes
    • Clark: yes
    • Hunley: yes
    • Schmitt: yes
    • Bassler: yes
    • Crider: yes
    • Jackson, L: yes
    • Spencer: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Deery: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Taylor: yes
    • Bohacek: yes
    • Dernulc: yes
    • Koch: yes
    • Tomes: yes
    • Bray: yes
    • Donato: yes
    • Leising: yes
    • Walker G: yes
    • Brown: yes
    • Ford J.D.: yes
    • Maxwell: yes
    • Walker K: yes
    • Buchanan: yes
    • Freeman: yes
    • McKinley: yes
    • Yoder: yes
    • Buck: yes
    • Garten: yes
    • Niemeyer: yes
    • Young: yes
    • Busch: yes
    • Gaskill: yes
    • Niezgodski: yes
    • Byrne: yes
    • Glick: yes
    • Raatz: yes
    • Pol: excused
    • Doriot: not voting
    • Mishler: not voting
    • Qaddoura: not voting

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:22:09.317128Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=IN&identifier=SB 169. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.