IA SF 659
enactedA bill for an act relating to state government and finances, including by making, modifying, limiting, or reducing appropriations, distributions, or transfers; authorizing expenditure of unappropriated moneys in special funds; providing for properly related matters including crystalline polymorph psilocybin, medical residency and fellowship positions, state membership in the Iowa individual health benefit reinsurance association, student abuse by school employees, modified supplemental amounts for school budgets, wagering taxes, a state fire marshal study, certain legislative interim studies, and 911 emergency communications services; making corrections; and including effective date, applicability, and retroactive applicability provisions.
Iowa · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did IA SF 659 pass?
Yes. IA SF 659 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-06-27): Explanations of votes.
What is IA SF 659 about?
IA SF 659 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “A bill for an act relating to state government and finances, including by making, modifying, limiting, or reducing appropriations, distributions, or transfers; authorizing expenditure of unappropriated moneys in special funds; providing for properly related matters including crystalline polymorph psilocybin, medical residency and fellowship positions, state membership in the Iowa individual health benefit reinsurance association, student abuse by school employees, modified supplemental amounts for school budgets, wagering taxes, a state fire marshal study, certain legislative interim studies, and 911 emergency communications services; making corrections; and including effective date, applicability, and retroactive applicability provisions.”.
Who sponsors IA SF 659?
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS is the primary sponsor of IA SF 659.
- Introduced
- 2025-05-14
- Latest action
- 2025-06-27 — Explanations of votes.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONSprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2025-06-27
Explanations of votes.
2025-06-11
Signed by Governor.
executive-signature
2025-06-03
NOBA: Final
2025-05-23
Reported correctly enrolled, signed by President and Speaker, and sent to Governor.
2025-05-20
Explanation of vote.
2025-05-14
Message from House.
2025-05-14
Immediate message.
2025-05-14
NOBA: Senate Full Approps
2025-05-14
Passed House, yeas 78, nays 3.
passage
2025-05-14
Substituted for HF 1055.
2025-05-14
Read first time, passed on file.
reading-1
2025-05-14
Message from Senate.
2025-05-14
Immediate message.
2025-05-14
Passed Senate, yeas 28, nays 11.
passage
2025-05-14
Amendment S-3195 filed, adopted.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2025-05-14
Committee report, approving bill.
committee-passage
2025-05-14
Introduced, placed on Appropriations calendar.
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Shall the bill pass?
2025-05-14 · pass · 78-3
Member-level votes (152)
- Amos: yes
- Jr.: yes
- Andrews: yes
- Baeth: yes
- Bagniewski: yes
- Barker: yes
- Behn: yes
- Blom: yes
- Bloomingdale: yes
- Boden: yes
- Bossman: yes
- Bradley: yes
- Brown-Powers: yes
- Cisneros: yes
- Collins: yes
- Cooling: yes
- Determann: yes
- Dunwell: yes
- Fett: yes
- Fisher: yes
- Gearhart: yes
- Gehlbach: yes
- Gerhold: yes
- Golding: yes
- Harris: yes
- Hayes: yes
- Henderson: yes
- Hermanson: yes
- Holt: yes
- Hora: yes
- Ingels: yes
- James: yes
- Jeneary: yes
- Johnson, C.: yes
- Johnson, R.: yes
- Jones: yes
- Judge: yes
- Kaufmann: yes
- Kniff: yes
- McCulla: yes
- Konfrst: yes
- Latham: yes
- Lundgren: yes
- Matson: yes
- McBurney: yes
- Meggers: yes
- Meyer, A.: yes
- Meyer, B.: yes
- Mohr: yes
- Mommsen: yes
- Moore: yes
- Nielsen: yes
- Nordman: yes
- Olson: yes
- Ramirez: yes
- Rinker: yes
- Scholten: yes
- Sexton: yes
- Smith: yes
- Sorensen: yes
- Srinivas: yes
- Stone: yes
- Thompson: yes
- Thomson: yes
- Turek: yes
- Vondran: yes
- Watkins: yes
- Weldon: yes
- Wengryn: yes
- Wessel-Kroeschell: yes
- Wichtendahl: yes
- Wilburn: yes
- Williams: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Wilz: yes
- Windschitl: yes
- Wood: yes
- Wulf: yes
- Young: yes
- Speaker: yes
- Grassley: yes
- Gjerde: no
- Lohse: no
- Zabner: no
- Bergan: absent
- Croken: absent
- Dieken: absent
- Ehlert: absent
- Gaines: absent
- Gosa: absent
- Gustoff: absent
- Jacoby: absent
- Kressig: absent
- Kurth: absent
- Lawler: absent
- Levin: absent
- Madison: absent
- Shipley: absent
- Sieck: absent
- Siegrist: absent
- Sitzmann: absent
- Wheeler: absent
- Wills: absent
- Alons: yes
- Bousselot: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Costello: yes
- Dickey: yes
- Evans: yes
- Garrett: yes
- Green: yes
- Gruenhagen: yes
- Guth: yes
- Klimesh: yes
- Koelker: yes
- Kraayenbrink: yes
- Pike: yes
- Reichman: yes
- Rowley: yes
- Rozenboom: yes
- Salmon: yes
- Sinclair: yes
- Sires: yes
- Sweeney: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Warme: yes
- Webster: yes
- Westrich: yes
- Whitver: yes
- Zumbach: yes
- Bennett: no
- Blake: no
- Donahue: no
- Dotzler: no
- Knox: no
- Petersen: no
- Townsend: no
- Trone: no
- Garriott: no
- Weiner: no
- Winckler: no
- Zimmer: no
- Bisignano: absent
- Celsi: absent
- Dawson De Witt: absent
- Driscoll: absent
- Lofgren: absent
- McClintock: absent
- Quirmbach: absent
- Schultz: absent
- Staed: absent
- Wahls: absent
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-05T05:37:19.579799Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=IA&identifier=SF 659. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.