IA SF 607

enacted

A bill for an act relating to unemployment insurance taxes on employers.

Iowa · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did IA SF 607 pass?

Yes. IA SF 607 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-06-27): Explanations of votes.

What is IA SF 607 about?

IA SF 607 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “A bill for an act relating to unemployment insurance taxes on employers.”.

Who sponsors IA SF 607?

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS is the primary sponsor of IA SF 607.

Introduced: 2025-03-12
Latest action: 2025-06-27 — Explanations of votes.
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

2025-06-27
Explanations of votes.
2025-06-06
Fiscal note.
2025-06-05
Signed by Governor.
executive-signature
2025-05-23
Reported correctly enrolled, signed by President and Speaker, and sent to Governor.
2025-05-20
Explanation of vote.
2025-05-14
Message from House.
2025-05-14
Immediate message.
2025-05-14
Passed House, yeas 60, nays 27.
passage
2025-05-14
Substituted for HF 980.
2025-05-14
Read first time, passed on file.
reading-1
2025-05-14
Fiscal note.
2025-05-14
Message from Senate.
2025-05-14
Immediate message.
2025-05-14
Passed Senate, yeas 32, nays 16.
passage
2025-05-14
Amendment S-3186 filed, lost.
amendment-introduction
2025-05-14
Amendment S-3185 filed, lost.
amendment-introduction
2025-05-14
Amendment S-3184 filed, lost.
amendment-introduction
2025-05-14
Amendment S-3181 filed, adopted.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage
2025-03-25
Fiscal note.
2025-03-12
Committee report, approving bill.
committee-passage
2025-03-12
Introduced, placed on Ways and Means calendar.
introduction

Versions

Signed Enrolled Bill (PDF)Compare
Amendment S-3186Compare
Amendment S-3185Compare
Amendment S-3184Compare
Amendment S-3181Compare
IntroducedCompare
Reprinted Marked UpCompare
ReprintedCompare
EnrolledCompare
Enrolled with Governor's ActionCompare
(document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

Shall amendment S-3186 be adopted?
2025-05-14 · fail · 16-32
Member-level votes (51)
- Bennett: yes
- Bisignano: yes
- Blake: yes
- Celsi: yes
- Donahue: yes
- Dotzler: yes
- Knox: yes
- Petersen: yes
- Quirmbach: yes
- Staed: yes
- Townsend: yes
- Trone: yes
- Garriott: yes
- Wahls: yes
- Weiner: yes
- Winckler: yes
- Zimmer: yes
- Alons: no
- Bousselot: no
- Campbell: no
- Costello: no
- Dawson: no
- Dickey: no
- Driscoll: no
- Evans: no
- Garrett: no
- Green: no
- Gruenhagen: no
- Guth: no
- Klimesh: no
- Koelker: no
- Kraayenbrink: no
- Lofgren: no
- Pike: no
- Reichman: no
- Rowley: no
- Rozenboom: no
- Salmon: no
- Schultz: no
- Shipley: no
- Sinclair: no
- Sires: no
- Sweeney: no
- Taylor: no
- Warme: no
- Webster: no
- Westrich: no
- Whitver: no
- Zumbach: no
- De Witt: absent
- McClintock: absent
Shall the bill pass?
2025-05-14 · pass · 32-16
Member-level votes (152)
- Alons: yes
- Bousselot: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Costello: yes
- Dawson: yes
- Dickey: yes
- Driscoll: yes
- Evans: yes
- Garrett: yes
- Green: yes
- Gruenhagen: yes
- Guth: yes
- Klimesh: yes
- Koelker: yes
- Kraayenbrink: yes
- Lofgren: yes
- Pike: yes
- Reichman: yes
- Rowley: yes
- Rozenboom: yes
- Salmon: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Shipley: yes
- Sinclair: yes
- Sires: yes
- Sweeney: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Warme: yes
- Webster: yes
- Westrich: yes
- Whitver: yes
- Zumbach: yes
- Bennett: no
- Bisignano: no
- Blake: no
- Celsi: no
- Donahue: no
- Dotzler: no
- Knox: no
- Petersen: no
- Quirmbach: no
- Staed: no
- Townsend: no
- Trone: no
- Garriott: no
- Wahls: no
- Weiner: no
- Winckler: no
- Zimmer: no
- De Witt: absent
- McClintock: absent
- Andrews: yes
- Barker: yes
- Behn: yes
- Bergan: yes
- Blom: yes
- Bloomingdale: yes
- Boden: yes
- Bossman: yes
- Bradley: yes
- Cisneros: yes
- Collins: yes
- Determann: yes
- Dunwell: yes
- Fett: yes
- Fisher: yes
- Gearhart: yes
- Gehlbach: yes
- Gerhold: yes
- Golding: yes
- Grassley: yes
- Harris: yes
- Hayes: yes
- Henderson: yes
- Hermanson: yes
- Holt: yes
- Hora: yes
- Ingels: yes
- Jeneary: yes
- Johnson, C.: yes
- Jones: yes
- Kaufmann: yes
- Kniff: yes
- McCulla: yes
- Latham: yes
- Lawler: yes
- Lohse: yes
- Lundgren: yes
- Meggers: yes
- Meyer, A.: yes
- Mohr: yes
- Mommsen: yes
- Moore: yes
- Nordman: yes
- Rinker: yes
- Sexton: yes
- Smith: yes
- Sorensen: yes
- Stone: yes
- Thompson: yes
- Thomson: yes
- Vondran: yes
- Watkins: yes
- Weldon: yes
- Wengryn: yes
- Williams: yes
- Wilz: yes
- Windschitl: yes
- Wood: yes
- Wulf: yes
- Young: yes
- Wills: yes
- Amos: no
- Jr.: no
- Baeth: no
- Bagniewski: no
- Brown-Powers: no
- Cooling: no
- Gjerde: no
- James: no
- Johnson, R.: no
- Judge: no
- Konfrst: no
- Kressig: no
- Kurth: no
- Madison: no
- Matson: no
- McBurney: no
- Meyer, B.: no
- Nielsen: no
- Olson: no
- Ramirez: no
- Scholten: no
- Srinivas: no
- Turek: no
- Wessel-Kroeschell: no
- Wichtendahl: no
- Wilburn: no
- Wilson: no
- Zabner: no
- Croken: absent
- Dieken: absent
- Ehlert: absent
- Gaines: absent
- Gosa: absent
- Gustoff: absent
- Jacoby: absent
- Levin: absent
- Sieck: absent
- Siegrist: absent
- Sitzmann: absent
- Wheeler: absent
Shall amendment S-3185 be adopted?
2025-05-14 · fail · 16-32
Member-level votes (51)
- Bennett: yes
- Bisignano: yes
- Blake: yes
- Celsi: yes
- Donahue: yes
- Dotzler: yes
- Knox: yes
- Petersen: yes
- Quirmbach: yes
- Staed: yes
- Townsend: yes
- Trone: yes
- Garriott: yes
- Wahls: yes
- Weiner: yes
- Winckler: yes
- Zimmer: yes
- Alons: no
- Bousselot: no
- Campbell: no
- Costello: no
- Dawson: no
- Dickey: no
- Driscoll: no
- Evans: no
- Garrett: no
- Green: no
- Gruenhagen: no
- Guth: no
- Klimesh: no
- Koelker: no
- Kraayenbrink: no
- Lofgren: no
- Pike: no
- Reichman: no
- Rowley: no
- Rozenboom: no
- Salmon: no
- Schultz: no
- Shipley: no
- Sinclair: no
- Sires: no
- Sweeney: no
- Taylor: no
- Warme: no
- Webster: no
- Westrich: no
- Whitver: no
- Zumbach: no
- De Witt: absent
- McClintock: absent
Shall amendment S-3184 be adopted?
2025-05-14 · fail · 16-31
Member-level votes (51)
- Bennett: yes
- Bisignano: yes
- Blake: yes
- Celsi: yes
- Donahue: yes
- Dotzler: yes
- Knox: yes
- Petersen: yes
- Quirmbach: yes
- Staed: yes
- Townsend: yes
- Trone: yes
- Garriott: yes
- Wahls: yes
- Weiner: yes
- Winckler: yes
- Zimmer: yes
- Alons: no
- Bousselot: no
- Campbell: no
- Costello: no
- Dawson: no
- Dickey: no
- Driscoll: no
- Evans: no
- Garrett: no
- Green: no
- Gruenhagen: no
- Guth: no
- Klimesh: no
- Koelker: no
- Kraayenbrink: no
- Lofgren: no
- Pike: no
- Rowley: no
- Rozenboom: no
- Salmon: no
- Schultz: no
- Shipley: no
- Sinclair: no
- Sires: no
- Sweeney: no
- Taylor: no
- Warme: no
- Webster: no
- Westrich: no
- Whitver: no
- Zumbach: no
- De Witt: absent
- McClintock: absent
- Reichman: absent

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislation/billTracking/billHistory?billName=SF 607&ga=91

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-05T05:28:45.441465Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this session Session dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=IA&identifier=SF 607. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.
Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.