Bill Commons

FL HB 359

enacted

Search Warrants

Florida · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did FL HB 359 pass?

Yes. FL HB 359 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-06-29): Chapter No. 2026-177

What is FL HB 359 about?

Search Warrants; Authorizes search warrant to be issued to recover deceased body; revises time within which certain search warrants must be returned to court; specifies time period within which search warrant issued for certain devices is considered timely executed; specifies that law enforcement agency may review data or information contained in certain devices after specified periods if devices were timely seized; provides that judge may authorize law enforcement officer applying for search warrant to appear remotely; provides that judge may authorize law enforcement officer applying for search warrant or court order to appear remotely; defines "audio-video communication technology"; authorizes law enforcement agency to obtain search warrant to use drone to conduct search in certain circumstances.

Who sponsors FL HB 359?

Gottlieb, Anderson, Judiciary Committee are the primary sponsors of FL HB 359, joined by 4 cosponsors.

Description

Search Warrants; Authorizes search warrant to be issued to recover deceased body; revises time within which certain search warrants must be returned to court; specifies time period within which search warrant issued for certain devices is considered timely executed; specifies that law enforcement agency may review data or information contained in certain devices after specified periods if devices were timely seized; provides that judge may authorize law enforcement officer applying for search warrant to appear remotely; provides that judge may authorize law enforcement officer applying for search warrant or court order to appear remotely; defines "audio-video communication technology"; authorizes law enforcement agency to obtain search warrant to use drone to conduct search in certain circumstances.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-06-29 — Chapter No. 2026-177
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Gottliebprimary
  • Andersonprimary
  • Judiciary Committeeprimary
  • Steelecosponsor
  • Mooneycosponsor
  • Shoafcosponsor
  • Plasenciacosponsor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-29

    Chapter No. 2026-177

  2. 2026-06-26

    Approved by Governor

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-06-15

    Signed by Officers and presented to Governor

    executive-receipt

  4. 2026-03-05

    Ordered enrolled

    enrolled

  5. 2026-03-05

    In Messages

  6. 2026-03-04

    CS passed; YEAS 37 NAYS 0

    passage

  7. 2026-03-04

    Read 3rd time

    reading-3

  8. 2026-03-04

    Read 2nd time

    reading-2

  9. 2026-03-04

    Substituted for CS/SB 442

  10. 2026-03-04

    Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading

  11. 2026-03-04

    Withdrawn from Rules

    withdrawal

  12. 2026-02-26

    Received

    enrolled

  13. 2026-02-26

    Referred to Rules

    referral-committee

  14. 2026-02-25

    In Messages

  15. 2026-02-25

    CS passed as amended; YEAS 115, NAYS 0

    passage

  16. 2026-02-25

    Read 3rd time

    reading-3

  17. 2026-02-25

    Added to Third Reading Calendar

  18. 2026-02-25

    Amendment 213119 adopted

  19. 2026-02-25

    Read 2nd time

    reading-2

  20. 2026-02-19

    Bill added to Special Order Calendar (2/25/2026)

  21. 2026-02-04

    Added to Second Reading Calendar

  22. 2026-02-04

    1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)

    reading-1

  23. 2026-02-04

    Bill referred to House Calendar

  24. 2026-02-03

    CS Filed

    filing

  25. 2026-02-03

    Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)

    deferral

  26. 2026-02-03

    Reported out of Judiciary Committee

  27. 2026-02-03

    Favorable with CS by Judiciary Committee

    committee-passage-favorable

  28. 2026-01-30

    PCS added to Judiciary Committee agenda

  29. 2026-01-13

    1st Reading (Original Filed Version)

    filing,reading-1

  30. 2025-12-02

    Now in Judiciary Committee

  31. 2025-12-02

    Reported out of Criminal Justice Subcommittee

  32. 2025-12-02

    Favorable by Criminal Justice Subcommittee

    committee-passage-favorable

  33. 2025-11-24

    Added to Criminal Justice Subcommittee agenda

  34. 2025-11-18

    Now in Criminal Justice Subcommittee

  35. 2025-11-18

    Referred to Judiciary Committee

    referral-committee

  36. 2025-11-18

    Referred to Criminal Justice Subcommittee

    referral-committee

  37. 2025-11-05

    Filed

    filing

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Passage, Third Reading

    2026-02-25 · pass · 115-0

    Member-level votes (117)
    • Abbott: yes
    • Eskamani: yes
    • Oliver: yes
    • Albert: yes
    • Esposito: yes
    • Overdorf: yes
    • Alvarez, D.: yes
    • Fabricio: yes
    • Owen: yes
    • Alvarez, J.: yes
    • Franklin: yes
    • Partington: yes
    • Anderson: yes
    • Gantt: yes
    • Perez: yes
    • Andrade: yes
    • Garrison: yes
    • Persons-Mulicka: yes
    • Antone: yes
    • Gentry: yes
    • Plakon: yes
    • Aristide: yes
    • Gerwig: yes
    • Plasencia: yes
    • Baker: yes
    • Giallombardo: yes
    • Porras: yes
    • Bankson: yes
    • Gonzalez Pittman: yes
    • Rayner: yes
    • Barnaby: yes
    • Gossett-Seidman: yes
    • Redondo: yes
    • Bartleman: yes
    • Gottlieb: yes
    • Rizo: yes
    • Basabe: yes
    • Greco: yes
    • Robinson, F.: yes
    • Benarroch: yes
    • Griffitts: yes
    • Robinson, W.: yes
    • Berfield: yes
    • Grow: yes
    • Rosenwald: yes
    • Black: yes
    • Harris: yes
    • Salzman: yes
    • Blanco: yes
    • Hart-Lowman: yes
    • Sapp: yes
    • Booth: yes
    • Hinson: yes
    • Shoaf: yes
    • Borrero: yes
    • Hodgers: yes
    • Sirois: yes
    • Botana: yes
    • Holcomb: yes
    • Skidmore: yes
    • Boyles: yes
    • Hunschofsky: yes
    • Smith: yes
    • Brackett: yes
    • Jacques: yes
    • Snyder: yes
    • Brannan: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Spencer: yes
    • Buchanan: yes
    • Stark: yes
    • Busatta: yes
    • Kendall: yes
    • Steele: yes
    • Campbell: yes
    • Kincart Jonsson: yes
    • Tant: yes
    • Canady: yes
    • Koster: yes
    • Tendrich: yes
    • Cassel: yes
    • LaMarca: yes
    • Tomkow: yes
    • Chamberlin: yes
    • Long: yes
    • Trabulsy: yes
    • López, J.: yes
    • Tramont: yes
    • Chaney: yes
    • Maggard: yes
    • Tuck: yes
    • Cobb: yes
    • Maney: yes
    • Valdés: yes
    • Conerly: yes
    • McClure: yes
    • Weinberger: yes
    • Cross: yes
    • McFarland: yes
    • Woodson: yes
    • Daley: yes
    • Melo: yes
    • Yarkosky: yes
    • Daniels: yes
    • Michael: yes
    • Yeager: yes
    • Driskell: yes
    • Miller: yes
    • Young: yes
    • Duggan: yes
    • Mooney: yes
    • Dunkley: yes
    • Nix: yes
    • Edmonds: yes
    • Nixon: yes
    • Joseph: not voting
    • Chambliss: not voting
  • Third Reading

    2026-03-04 · pass · 37-0

    Member-level votes (39)
    • Arrington: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Polsky: yes
    • Avila: excused
    • Grall: yes
    • Rodriguez: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Gruters: yes
    • Rouson: yes
    • Bernard: yes
    • Harrell: yes
    • Sharief: yes
    • Boyd: yes
    • Hooper: yes
    • Simon: yes
    • Bracy Davis: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Smith: yes
    • Bradley: yes
    • Leek: yes
    • Truenow: yes
    • Brodeur: yes
    • Martin: yes
    • Trumbull: yes
    • Burgess: yes
    • Massullo: yes
    • Wright: yes
    • Burton: yes
    • Mayfield: yes
    • Yarborough: yes
    • Calatayud: yes
    • McClain: yes
    • Albritton: yes
    • Davis: excused
    • Osgood: yes
    • DiCeglie: yes
    • Passidomo: yes
    • Gaetz: yes
    • Pizzo: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:19:20.677932Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=FL&identifier=HB 359. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.