CO SB 82
died on adjournmentLocal Government Renewable Energy Development Fee
Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CO SB 82 pass?
No. CO SB 82 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-02-06): Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Transportation & Energy
What is CO SB 82 about?
A renewable energy project developer (facility owner) that intends to undertake a project to build a renewable energy facility (renewable energy project) may currently submit an application for land use approval from the renewable energy project to a local government. However, current law does not specify what process a local government may use to charge fees or set a timeline for the local government to make a final decision regarding land use approval for the renewable energy project. The bill specifies that control over the specifics of the application process rests with the local government. The local government may establish fees for an application for a renewable energy project and may offer two independent tracks for the application based on the fee the facility owner pays. The standard track allows a facility owner to pay a lower fee, but does not guarantee a specific timeline for the local government to issue a final decision on the application. The expedited track allows a facility owner to pay an additional fee, with an agreement that if the local government takes longer than 120 days, minus any permitted tolling periods, a percentage of the higher fee will be refunded. The bill gives local governments authority to contract with third-party technical reviewers to review the application for a final decision. The bill also requires a facility owner to pay a success fee to the local government upon final approval of the project, based on the amount of time between receipt of the application and when the project is approved, to be used by the local government for expenses related to regulating renewable energy facilities and maintaining local roads impacted by facility construction.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Who sponsors CO SB 82?
B. Pelton is the primary sponsor of CO SB 82.
Description
A renewable energy project developer (facility owner) that intends to undertake a project to build a renewable energy facility (renewable energy project) may currently submit an application for land use approval from the renewable energy project to a local government. However, current law does not specify what process a local government may use to charge fees or set a timeline for the local government to make a final decision regarding land use approval for the renewable energy project. The bill specifies that control over the specifics of the application process rests with the local government. The local government may establish fees for an application for a renewable energy project and may offer two independent tracks for the application based on the fee the facility owner pays. The standard track allows a facility owner to pay a lower fee, but does not guarantee a specific timeline for the local government to issue a final decision on the application. The expedited track allows a facility owner to pay an additional fee, with an agreement that if the local government takes longer than 120 days, minus any permitted tolling periods, a percentage of the higher fee will be refunded. The bill gives local governments authority to contract with third-party technical reviewers to review the application for a final decision. The bill also requires a facility owner to pay a success fee to the local government upon final approval of the project, based on the amount of time between receipt of the application and when the project is approved, to be used by the local government for expenses related to regulating renewable energy facilities and maintaining local roads impacted by facility construction.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
- Introduced
- 2026-02-06
- Latest action
- 2026-02-06 — Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Transportation & Energy
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- B. Peltonsponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-05-12
Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 05/14/2026 - No Amendments
2026-05-08
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over to 05/12/2026 - No Amendments
2026-05-06
Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 05/08/2026 - No Amendments
2026-05-04
Senate Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
2026-04-29
Senate Committee on Transportation & Energy Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-02-06
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Transportation & Energy
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Adopt amendment L.003
2026-04-29 · pass · 0-0
Adopt amendment L.002
2026-04-29 · pass · 0-0
Adopt amendment L.001
2026-04-29 · pass · 0-0
Refer Senate Bill 26-082, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-04-29 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (9)
- Mark Baisley: yes
- Marc Catlin: yes
- Tony Exum: yes
- William Lindstedt: yes
- Kyle Mullica: yes
- Byron Pelton: yes
- Tom Sullivan: no
- Matt Ball: yes
- Lisa Cutter: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-08-08T01:57:41.193191Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=SB 82. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.